Cargando…

Comparative Analysis of Microbial Community Structure and Function in the Gut of Wild and Captive Amur Tiger

It has been well acknowledged that the gut microbiome is important for host health, composition changes in these microbial communities might increase susceptibility to infections and reduce adaptability to environment. Reintroduction, as an effective strategy for wild population recovery and genetic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ning, Yao, Qi, Jinzhe, Dobbins, Michael T., Liang, Xin, Wang, Jingxuan, Chen, Shiyu, Ma, Jianzhang, Jiang, Guangshun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7393233/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32793154
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.01665
_version_ 1783565002907582464
author Ning, Yao
Qi, Jinzhe
Dobbins, Michael T.
Liang, Xin
Wang, Jingxuan
Chen, Shiyu
Ma, Jianzhang
Jiang, Guangshun
author_facet Ning, Yao
Qi, Jinzhe
Dobbins, Michael T.
Liang, Xin
Wang, Jingxuan
Chen, Shiyu
Ma, Jianzhang
Jiang, Guangshun
author_sort Ning, Yao
collection PubMed
description It has been well acknowledged that the gut microbiome is important for host health, composition changes in these microbial communities might increase susceptibility to infections and reduce adaptability to environment. Reintroduction, as an effective strategy for wild population recovery and genetic diversity maintenance for endangered populations, usually takes captive populations as rewilding resource. While, little is known about the compositional and functional differences of gut microbiota between captive and wild populations, especially for large carnivores, like Amur tiger. In this study, high throughput sequencing of the 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene (amplicon sequencing) and metagenomics were used to analyze the composition and function variations of gut microbiota communities between captive and wild Amur tiger populations based on total 35 fecal samples (13 from captive tigers and 22 from wild tigers). Our results showed that captive Amur tigers have higher alpha diversity in gut microbiota, but that the average unweighted UniFrac distance of bacterial taxa among wild Amur tigers was much larger. The function differences involve most aspects of the body functions, especially for metabolism, environmental information processing, cellular processes, and organismal systems. It was indicated that the diet habit and environment difference between captive and wild populations lead to composition differences of gut microbiota and then resulted in significant differences in functions. These contrasts of functional and compositional variations in gut microbiota between wild and captive Amur tigers are essential insights for guiding conservation management and policy decision-making, and call for more attention on the influence of gut microbiota on the ability of captive animals to survive in the wild.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7393233
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73932332020-08-12 Comparative Analysis of Microbial Community Structure and Function in the Gut of Wild and Captive Amur Tiger Ning, Yao Qi, Jinzhe Dobbins, Michael T. Liang, Xin Wang, Jingxuan Chen, Shiyu Ma, Jianzhang Jiang, Guangshun Front Microbiol Microbiology It has been well acknowledged that the gut microbiome is important for host health, composition changes in these microbial communities might increase susceptibility to infections and reduce adaptability to environment. Reintroduction, as an effective strategy for wild population recovery and genetic diversity maintenance for endangered populations, usually takes captive populations as rewilding resource. While, little is known about the compositional and functional differences of gut microbiota between captive and wild populations, especially for large carnivores, like Amur tiger. In this study, high throughput sequencing of the 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene (amplicon sequencing) and metagenomics were used to analyze the composition and function variations of gut microbiota communities between captive and wild Amur tiger populations based on total 35 fecal samples (13 from captive tigers and 22 from wild tigers). Our results showed that captive Amur tigers have higher alpha diversity in gut microbiota, but that the average unweighted UniFrac distance of bacterial taxa among wild Amur tigers was much larger. The function differences involve most aspects of the body functions, especially for metabolism, environmental information processing, cellular processes, and organismal systems. It was indicated that the diet habit and environment difference between captive and wild populations lead to composition differences of gut microbiota and then resulted in significant differences in functions. These contrasts of functional and compositional variations in gut microbiota between wild and captive Amur tigers are essential insights for guiding conservation management and policy decision-making, and call for more attention on the influence of gut microbiota on the ability of captive animals to survive in the wild. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7393233/ /pubmed/32793154 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.01665 Text en Copyright © 2020 Ning, Qi, Dobbins, Liang, Wang, Chen, Ma and Jiang. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Ning, Yao
Qi, Jinzhe
Dobbins, Michael T.
Liang, Xin
Wang, Jingxuan
Chen, Shiyu
Ma, Jianzhang
Jiang, Guangshun
Comparative Analysis of Microbial Community Structure and Function in the Gut of Wild and Captive Amur Tiger
title Comparative Analysis of Microbial Community Structure and Function in the Gut of Wild and Captive Amur Tiger
title_full Comparative Analysis of Microbial Community Structure and Function in the Gut of Wild and Captive Amur Tiger
title_fullStr Comparative Analysis of Microbial Community Structure and Function in the Gut of Wild and Captive Amur Tiger
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Analysis of Microbial Community Structure and Function in the Gut of Wild and Captive Amur Tiger
title_short Comparative Analysis of Microbial Community Structure and Function in the Gut of Wild and Captive Amur Tiger
title_sort comparative analysis of microbial community structure and function in the gut of wild and captive amur tiger
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7393233/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32793154
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.01665
work_keys_str_mv AT ningyao comparativeanalysisofmicrobialcommunitystructureandfunctioninthegutofwildandcaptiveamurtiger
AT qijinzhe comparativeanalysisofmicrobialcommunitystructureandfunctioninthegutofwildandcaptiveamurtiger
AT dobbinsmichaelt comparativeanalysisofmicrobialcommunitystructureandfunctioninthegutofwildandcaptiveamurtiger
AT liangxin comparativeanalysisofmicrobialcommunitystructureandfunctioninthegutofwildandcaptiveamurtiger
AT wangjingxuan comparativeanalysisofmicrobialcommunitystructureandfunctioninthegutofwildandcaptiveamurtiger
AT chenshiyu comparativeanalysisofmicrobialcommunitystructureandfunctioninthegutofwildandcaptiveamurtiger
AT majianzhang comparativeanalysisofmicrobialcommunitystructureandfunctioninthegutofwildandcaptiveamurtiger
AT jiangguangshun comparativeanalysisofmicrobialcommunitystructureandfunctioninthegutofwildandcaptiveamurtiger