Cargando…

Differential diagnostic value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in osteolytic lesions

BACKGROUND: Both bone metastases and multiple myeloma (MM) are malignant diseases that can appear osteolytic on imaging and are difficult to differentiate. While positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has been demonstrated useful for the diagnosis of various bone lesions, correlat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Xiaomeng, Wu, Ning, Zhang, Wenjie, Liu, Ying, Ming, Yue
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7393436/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32760643
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbo.2020.100302
_version_ 1783565045135835136
author Li, Xiaomeng
Wu, Ning
Zhang, Wenjie
Liu, Ying
Ming, Yue
author_facet Li, Xiaomeng
Wu, Ning
Zhang, Wenjie
Liu, Ying
Ming, Yue
author_sort Li, Xiaomeng
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Both bone metastases and multiple myeloma (MM) are malignant diseases that can appear osteolytic on imaging and are difficult to differentiate. While positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has been demonstrated useful for the diagnosis of various bone lesions, correlations between PET/CT and histopathology and these diseases are unclear. This retrospective study investigated the optimal cutoff standardized uptake value (SUV) to differentiate MM and bone metastasis. METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed osteolytic lesions (n = 344) and suspected malignancy underwent both fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT and biopsy/surgery. FDG uptake and morphologic changes (e.g., soft tissue mass formation) were compared with pathological results. RESULTS: A total of 8896 osteolytic lesions were evaluated. The SUVmax of MM osteolytic lesions (1.6 ± 0.7) was significantly lower than that of bone metastases (5.5 ± 2.7; p = 0.000). The best cutoff SUVmax for differentiating MM and bone metastasis was 2.65 (sensitivity 86.1%, specificity 94.7%; p = 0.000). The SUVmax of bone lesions of soft tissue mass was higher than that for pure osteolytic lesions (p = 0.000). A greater percentage of patients with bone metastasis had a soft tissue mass (7%) than did patients with MM (2%). The mean SUVmax of bone metastases was 5.5 ± 2.7 (0.4–30.4); that of primary tumors was 7.5 ± 4.2 (1.0–28.5). The SUVmax of bone metastases significantly correlated with the SUVmax of primary tumors (r = 0.532; p = 0.000). CONCLUSIONS: FDG PET/CT is a valuable tool to differentiate osteolytic lesions. The best cutoff value of SUVmax for differentiating MM from bone metastasis is 2.65. The significant correlation between the SUVmax of bone metastasis and that of primary tumors is helpful for detecting primary tumors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7393436
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73934362020-08-04 Differential diagnostic value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in osteolytic lesions Li, Xiaomeng Wu, Ning Zhang, Wenjie Liu, Ying Ming, Yue J Bone Oncol Research Article BACKGROUND: Both bone metastases and multiple myeloma (MM) are malignant diseases that can appear osteolytic on imaging and are difficult to differentiate. While positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has been demonstrated useful for the diagnosis of various bone lesions, correlations between PET/CT and histopathology and these diseases are unclear. This retrospective study investigated the optimal cutoff standardized uptake value (SUV) to differentiate MM and bone metastasis. METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed osteolytic lesions (n = 344) and suspected malignancy underwent both fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT and biopsy/surgery. FDG uptake and morphologic changes (e.g., soft tissue mass formation) were compared with pathological results. RESULTS: A total of 8896 osteolytic lesions were evaluated. The SUVmax of MM osteolytic lesions (1.6 ± 0.7) was significantly lower than that of bone metastases (5.5 ± 2.7; p = 0.000). The best cutoff SUVmax for differentiating MM and bone metastasis was 2.65 (sensitivity 86.1%, specificity 94.7%; p = 0.000). The SUVmax of bone lesions of soft tissue mass was higher than that for pure osteolytic lesions (p = 0.000). A greater percentage of patients with bone metastasis had a soft tissue mass (7%) than did patients with MM (2%). The mean SUVmax of bone metastases was 5.5 ± 2.7 (0.4–30.4); that of primary tumors was 7.5 ± 4.2 (1.0–28.5). The SUVmax of bone metastases significantly correlated with the SUVmax of primary tumors (r = 0.532; p = 0.000). CONCLUSIONS: FDG PET/CT is a valuable tool to differentiate osteolytic lesions. The best cutoff value of SUVmax for differentiating MM from bone metastasis is 2.65. The significant correlation between the SUVmax of bone metastasis and that of primary tumors is helpful for detecting primary tumors. Elsevier 2020-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7393436/ /pubmed/32760643 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbo.2020.100302 Text en © 2020 Published by Elsevier GmbH. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Li, Xiaomeng
Wu, Ning
Zhang, Wenjie
Liu, Ying
Ming, Yue
Differential diagnostic value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in osteolytic lesions
title Differential diagnostic value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in osteolytic lesions
title_full Differential diagnostic value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in osteolytic lesions
title_fullStr Differential diagnostic value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in osteolytic lesions
title_full_unstemmed Differential diagnostic value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in osteolytic lesions
title_short Differential diagnostic value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in osteolytic lesions
title_sort differential diagnostic value of (18)f-fdg pet/ct in osteolytic lesions
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7393436/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32760643
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbo.2020.100302
work_keys_str_mv AT lixiaomeng differentialdiagnosticvalueof18ffdgpetctinosteolyticlesions
AT wuning differentialdiagnosticvalueof18ffdgpetctinosteolyticlesions
AT zhangwenjie differentialdiagnosticvalueof18ffdgpetctinosteolyticlesions
AT liuying differentialdiagnosticvalueof18ffdgpetctinosteolyticlesions
AT mingyue differentialdiagnosticvalueof18ffdgpetctinosteolyticlesions