Cargando…

Indigenous engagement in health: lessons from Brazil, Chile, Australia and New Zealand

BACKGROUND: Given the persistence of Indigenous health inequities across national contexts, many countries have adopted strategies to improve the health of Indigenous peoples. Governmental recognition of the unique health needs of Indigenous populations is necessary for the development of targeted p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ferdinand, Angeline, Lambert, Michelle, Trad, Leny, Pedrana, Leo, Paradies, Yin, Kelaher, Margaret
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7393707/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32731870
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-020-1149-1
_version_ 1783565089385742336
author Ferdinand, Angeline
Lambert, Michelle
Trad, Leny
Pedrana, Leo
Paradies, Yin
Kelaher, Margaret
author_facet Ferdinand, Angeline
Lambert, Michelle
Trad, Leny
Pedrana, Leo
Paradies, Yin
Kelaher, Margaret
author_sort Ferdinand, Angeline
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Given the persistence of Indigenous health inequities across national contexts, many countries have adopted strategies to improve the health of Indigenous peoples. Governmental recognition of the unique health needs of Indigenous populations is necessary for the development of targeted programs and policies to achieve universal health coverage. At the same time, the participation of Indigenous peoples in decision-making and program and policy design helps to ensure that barriers to health services are appropriately addressed and promotes the rights of Indigenous peoples to self-determination. Due to similar patterns of Indigenous health and health determinants across borders, there have been calls for greater global collaboration in this field. However, most international studies on Indigenous health policy link Anglo-settler democracies (Canada, Australia, Aotearoa/New Zealand and the United States), despite these countries representing a small fraction of the world’s Indigenous people. AIM: This paper examines national-level policy in Australia, Brazil, Chile and New Zealand in relation to governmental recognition of differential Indigenous health needs and engagement with Indigenous peoples in health. The paper aims to examine how Indigenous health needs and engagement are addressed in national policy frameworks within each of the countries in order to contribute to the understanding of how to develop pro-equity policies within national health care systems. METHODS: For each country, a review was undertaken of national policies and legislation to support engagement with, and participation of, Indigenous peoples in the identification of their health needs, development of programs and policies to address these needs and which demonstrate governmental recognition of differential Indigenous health needs. Government websites were searched as well as the following databases: Google, OpenGrey, CAB Direct, PubMed, Web of Science and WorldCat. FINDINGS: Each of the four countries have adopted international agreements regarding the engagement of Indigenous peoples in health. However, there is significant variation in the extent to which the principles laid out in these agreements are reflected in national policy, legislation and practice. Brazil and New Zealand both have established national policies to facilitate engagement. In contrast, national policy to enable engagement is relatively lacking in Australia and Chile. Australia, Brazil and New Zealand each have significant initiatives and policy structures in place to address Indigenous health. However, in Brazil this is not necessarily reflected in practice and although New Zealand has national policies these have been recently reported as insufficient and, in fact, may be contributing to health inequity for Māori. In comparison to the other three countries, Chile has relatively few national initiatives or policies in place to support Indigenous engagement or recognise the distinct health needs of Indigenous communities. CONCLUSIONS: The adoption of international policy frameworks forms an important step in ensuring that Indigenous peoples are able to participate in the formation and implementation of health policy and programs. However, without the relevant principles being reflected in national legislature, international agreements hold little weight. At the same time, while a national legislative framework facilitates the engagement of Indigenous peoples, such policy may not necessarily translate into practice. Developing multi-level approaches that improve cohesion between international policy, national policy and practice in Indigenous engagement in health is therefore vital. Given that each of the four countries demonstrate strengths and weaknesses across this causal chain, cross-country policy examination provides guidance on strengthening these links.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7393707
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73937072020-08-04 Indigenous engagement in health: lessons from Brazil, Chile, Australia and New Zealand Ferdinand, Angeline Lambert, Michelle Trad, Leny Pedrana, Leo Paradies, Yin Kelaher, Margaret Int J Equity Health Research BACKGROUND: Given the persistence of Indigenous health inequities across national contexts, many countries have adopted strategies to improve the health of Indigenous peoples. Governmental recognition of the unique health needs of Indigenous populations is necessary for the development of targeted programs and policies to achieve universal health coverage. At the same time, the participation of Indigenous peoples in decision-making and program and policy design helps to ensure that barriers to health services are appropriately addressed and promotes the rights of Indigenous peoples to self-determination. Due to similar patterns of Indigenous health and health determinants across borders, there have been calls for greater global collaboration in this field. However, most international studies on Indigenous health policy link Anglo-settler democracies (Canada, Australia, Aotearoa/New Zealand and the United States), despite these countries representing a small fraction of the world’s Indigenous people. AIM: This paper examines national-level policy in Australia, Brazil, Chile and New Zealand in relation to governmental recognition of differential Indigenous health needs and engagement with Indigenous peoples in health. The paper aims to examine how Indigenous health needs and engagement are addressed in national policy frameworks within each of the countries in order to contribute to the understanding of how to develop pro-equity policies within national health care systems. METHODS: For each country, a review was undertaken of national policies and legislation to support engagement with, and participation of, Indigenous peoples in the identification of their health needs, development of programs and policies to address these needs and which demonstrate governmental recognition of differential Indigenous health needs. Government websites were searched as well as the following databases: Google, OpenGrey, CAB Direct, PubMed, Web of Science and WorldCat. FINDINGS: Each of the four countries have adopted international agreements regarding the engagement of Indigenous peoples in health. However, there is significant variation in the extent to which the principles laid out in these agreements are reflected in national policy, legislation and practice. Brazil and New Zealand both have established national policies to facilitate engagement. In contrast, national policy to enable engagement is relatively lacking in Australia and Chile. Australia, Brazil and New Zealand each have significant initiatives and policy structures in place to address Indigenous health. However, in Brazil this is not necessarily reflected in practice and although New Zealand has national policies these have been recently reported as insufficient and, in fact, may be contributing to health inequity for Māori. In comparison to the other three countries, Chile has relatively few national initiatives or policies in place to support Indigenous engagement or recognise the distinct health needs of Indigenous communities. CONCLUSIONS: The adoption of international policy frameworks forms an important step in ensuring that Indigenous peoples are able to participate in the formation and implementation of health policy and programs. However, without the relevant principles being reflected in national legislature, international agreements hold little weight. At the same time, while a national legislative framework facilitates the engagement of Indigenous peoples, such policy may not necessarily translate into practice. Developing multi-level approaches that improve cohesion between international policy, national policy and practice in Indigenous engagement in health is therefore vital. Given that each of the four countries demonstrate strengths and weaknesses across this causal chain, cross-country policy examination provides guidance on strengthening these links. BioMed Central 2020-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7393707/ /pubmed/32731870 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-020-1149-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Ferdinand, Angeline
Lambert, Michelle
Trad, Leny
Pedrana, Leo
Paradies, Yin
Kelaher, Margaret
Indigenous engagement in health: lessons from Brazil, Chile, Australia and New Zealand
title Indigenous engagement in health: lessons from Brazil, Chile, Australia and New Zealand
title_full Indigenous engagement in health: lessons from Brazil, Chile, Australia and New Zealand
title_fullStr Indigenous engagement in health: lessons from Brazil, Chile, Australia and New Zealand
title_full_unstemmed Indigenous engagement in health: lessons from Brazil, Chile, Australia and New Zealand
title_short Indigenous engagement in health: lessons from Brazil, Chile, Australia and New Zealand
title_sort indigenous engagement in health: lessons from brazil, chile, australia and new zealand
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7393707/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32731870
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-020-1149-1
work_keys_str_mv AT ferdinandangeline indigenousengagementinhealthlessonsfrombrazilchileaustraliaandnewzealand
AT lambertmichelle indigenousengagementinhealthlessonsfrombrazilchileaustraliaandnewzealand
AT tradleny indigenousengagementinhealthlessonsfrombrazilchileaustraliaandnewzealand
AT pedranaleo indigenousengagementinhealthlessonsfrombrazilchileaustraliaandnewzealand
AT paradiesyin indigenousengagementinhealthlessonsfrombrazilchileaustraliaandnewzealand
AT kelahermargaret indigenousengagementinhealthlessonsfrombrazilchileaustraliaandnewzealand