Cargando…

Informing patients about their mutation tests: CDKN2A c.256G>A in melanoma as an example

BACKGROUND: When germline mutations are suspected as causal in cancer, patient DNA may be sequenced to detect variants in relevant genes. If a particular mutation has not been reported in reliable family studies, genetic counselors are facing a dilemma of appropriately informing patients. Many seque...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hemminki, Kari, Srivastava, Aayushi, Rachakonda, Sivaramakrishna, Bandapalli, Obul, Nagore, Eduardo, Hemminki, Akseli, Kumar, Rajiv
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7393828/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32760473
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13053-020-00146-x
_version_ 1783565111656448000
author Hemminki, Kari
Srivastava, Aayushi
Rachakonda, Sivaramakrishna
Bandapalli, Obul
Nagore, Eduardo
Hemminki, Akseli
Kumar, Rajiv
author_facet Hemminki, Kari
Srivastava, Aayushi
Rachakonda, Sivaramakrishna
Bandapalli, Obul
Nagore, Eduardo
Hemminki, Akseli
Kumar, Rajiv
author_sort Hemminki, Kari
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: When germline mutations are suspected as causal in cancer, patient DNA may be sequenced to detect variants in relevant genes. If a particular mutation has not been reported in reliable family studies, genetic counselors are facing a dilemma of appropriately informing patients. Many sequencing facilities provide an interpretation of the findings based on the available sequence databases or on prediction tools that are curated from bioinformatics and mechanistic datasets. The counseling dilemma is exacerbated if the pedigree data are not informative but the in silico predictions suggest pathogenicity. METHODS: We present here a real world example of the c.256G > A CDKN2A variant, which was detected in one melanoma patient where two siblings were diagnosed with melanoma in situ. We investigated a detailed family history of the affected siblings in order to survey probability of the cancer risks within the context to this mutation. RESULTS: This c.256G > A CDKN2A variant was detected in one of the brothers and in the melanoma-free mother while the other brother in the family tested negative. The variant had been previously described in one patient from a melanoma family. In the family under investigation, the mother’s 16 first-and second-degree relatives had survived past the median onset age for melanoma and none presented melanoma. We tested the variant using multiple bioinformatic tools that all predicted deleteriousness of the variant. The genetic counseling report to the melanoma patient stated that the CDKN2A variant was ‘likely pathogenic’ and the disease was defined as ‘likely hereditary melanoma’. CONCLUSIONS: The pedigree data showed at the most a low penetrance variant, which, if taken into consideration, might have altered the provided diagnosis. When dealing with ‘practically’ unknown variants the counselors would be advised to incorporate a detailed family history rather than basing predictions on functionality provided by sequencing facilities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7393828
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73938282020-08-04 Informing patients about their mutation tests: CDKN2A c.256G>A in melanoma as an example Hemminki, Kari Srivastava, Aayushi Rachakonda, Sivaramakrishna Bandapalli, Obul Nagore, Eduardo Hemminki, Akseli Kumar, Rajiv Hered Cancer Clin Pract Research BACKGROUND: When germline mutations are suspected as causal in cancer, patient DNA may be sequenced to detect variants in relevant genes. If a particular mutation has not been reported in reliable family studies, genetic counselors are facing a dilemma of appropriately informing patients. Many sequencing facilities provide an interpretation of the findings based on the available sequence databases or on prediction tools that are curated from bioinformatics and mechanistic datasets. The counseling dilemma is exacerbated if the pedigree data are not informative but the in silico predictions suggest pathogenicity. METHODS: We present here a real world example of the c.256G > A CDKN2A variant, which was detected in one melanoma patient where two siblings were diagnosed with melanoma in situ. We investigated a detailed family history of the affected siblings in order to survey probability of the cancer risks within the context to this mutation. RESULTS: This c.256G > A CDKN2A variant was detected in one of the brothers and in the melanoma-free mother while the other brother in the family tested negative. The variant had been previously described in one patient from a melanoma family. In the family under investigation, the mother’s 16 first-and second-degree relatives had survived past the median onset age for melanoma and none presented melanoma. We tested the variant using multiple bioinformatic tools that all predicted deleteriousness of the variant. The genetic counseling report to the melanoma patient stated that the CDKN2A variant was ‘likely pathogenic’ and the disease was defined as ‘likely hereditary melanoma’. CONCLUSIONS: The pedigree data showed at the most a low penetrance variant, which, if taken into consideration, might have altered the provided diagnosis. When dealing with ‘practically’ unknown variants the counselors would be advised to incorporate a detailed family history rather than basing predictions on functionality provided by sequencing facilities. BioMed Central 2020-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7393828/ /pubmed/32760473 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13053-020-00146-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Hemminki, Kari
Srivastava, Aayushi
Rachakonda, Sivaramakrishna
Bandapalli, Obul
Nagore, Eduardo
Hemminki, Akseli
Kumar, Rajiv
Informing patients about their mutation tests: CDKN2A c.256G>A in melanoma as an example
title Informing patients about their mutation tests: CDKN2A c.256G>A in melanoma as an example
title_full Informing patients about their mutation tests: CDKN2A c.256G>A in melanoma as an example
title_fullStr Informing patients about their mutation tests: CDKN2A c.256G>A in melanoma as an example
title_full_unstemmed Informing patients about their mutation tests: CDKN2A c.256G>A in melanoma as an example
title_short Informing patients about their mutation tests: CDKN2A c.256G>A in melanoma as an example
title_sort informing patients about their mutation tests: cdkn2a c.256g>a in melanoma as an example
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7393828/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32760473
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13053-020-00146-x
work_keys_str_mv AT hemminkikari informingpatientsabouttheirmutationtestscdkn2ac256gainmelanomaasanexample
AT srivastavaaayushi informingpatientsabouttheirmutationtestscdkn2ac256gainmelanomaasanexample
AT rachakondasivaramakrishna informingpatientsabouttheirmutationtestscdkn2ac256gainmelanomaasanexample
AT bandapalliobul informingpatientsabouttheirmutationtestscdkn2ac256gainmelanomaasanexample
AT nagoreeduardo informingpatientsabouttheirmutationtestscdkn2ac256gainmelanomaasanexample
AT hemminkiakseli informingpatientsabouttheirmutationtestscdkn2ac256gainmelanomaasanexample
AT kumarrajiv informingpatientsabouttheirmutationtestscdkn2ac256gainmelanomaasanexample