Cargando…

Room for improvement in non-pharmacological systemic sclerosis care? — a cross-sectional online survey of 650 patients

BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVE: To gain insight in the use of current systemic sclerosis (SSc) care provided by health professionals from the patient perspective. We focused on referral reasons, treatment goals, the alignment with unmet care needs, and outcome satisfaction. METHODS: Dutch SSc patients from 1...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stöcker, Juliane K., Vonk, Madelon C., van den Hoogen, Frank H. J., Nijhuis-van der Sanden, Maria W. G., Spierings, Julia, Staal, J. Bart, Satink, Ton, van den Ende, Cornelia H. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7393838/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32760879
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41927-020-00142-7
_version_ 1783565113519767552
author Stöcker, Juliane K.
Vonk, Madelon C.
van den Hoogen, Frank H. J.
Nijhuis-van der Sanden, Maria W. G.
Spierings, Julia
Staal, J. Bart
Satink, Ton
van den Ende, Cornelia H. M.
author_facet Stöcker, Juliane K.
Vonk, Madelon C.
van den Hoogen, Frank H. J.
Nijhuis-van der Sanden, Maria W. G.
Spierings, Julia
Staal, J. Bart
Satink, Ton
van den Ende, Cornelia H. M.
author_sort Stöcker, Juliane K.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVE: To gain insight in the use of current systemic sclerosis (SSc) care provided by health professionals from the patient perspective. We focused on referral reasons, treatment goals, the alignment with unmet care needs, and outcome satisfaction. METHODS: Dutch SSc patients from 13 participating rheumatology departments were invited to complete an online survey. Descriptive statistics were used to describe current use of non-pharmacological care and outcome satisfaction. Reasons for referral and treatment goals were encoded in International Classification of Function and Disability (ICF) terms. RESULTS: We included 650 patients (mean (standard deviation [SD]) age, 59.4 (11.4) years. 50% had contact with a health professional in the past year; 76.3% since disease onset. Physiotherapists were the most frequently visited in the past year (40.0%), followed by dental hygienists (11.4%) and podiatrists (9.2%). The three most common referral reasons were pain, joint mobility and cardiovascular functions. Fatigue, Raynaud’s phenomenon, physical limitations, reduced hand function and joint problems were mentioned by more than 25% of all respondents as unmet needs. The proportion of patients treated in the past year by a health professional who were satisfied with knowledge and expertise of their health professionals was 74.4%; 73% reported improved daily activities and better coping with complaints. However, 48.9% perceived that the collaboration between rheumatologist and health professional was never or only sometimes sufficient. CONCLUSION: Despite the high outcome satisfaction and good accessibility of health professionals, there are obstacles in the access to non-pharmacological care and communication barriers between health professionals and rheumatologists.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7393838
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73938382020-08-04 Room for improvement in non-pharmacological systemic sclerosis care? — a cross-sectional online survey of 650 patients Stöcker, Juliane K. Vonk, Madelon C. van den Hoogen, Frank H. J. Nijhuis-van der Sanden, Maria W. G. Spierings, Julia Staal, J. Bart Satink, Ton van den Ende, Cornelia H. M. BMC Rheumatol Research Article BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVE: To gain insight in the use of current systemic sclerosis (SSc) care provided by health professionals from the patient perspective. We focused on referral reasons, treatment goals, the alignment with unmet care needs, and outcome satisfaction. METHODS: Dutch SSc patients from 13 participating rheumatology departments were invited to complete an online survey. Descriptive statistics were used to describe current use of non-pharmacological care and outcome satisfaction. Reasons for referral and treatment goals were encoded in International Classification of Function and Disability (ICF) terms. RESULTS: We included 650 patients (mean (standard deviation [SD]) age, 59.4 (11.4) years. 50% had contact with a health professional in the past year; 76.3% since disease onset. Physiotherapists were the most frequently visited in the past year (40.0%), followed by dental hygienists (11.4%) and podiatrists (9.2%). The three most common referral reasons were pain, joint mobility and cardiovascular functions. Fatigue, Raynaud’s phenomenon, physical limitations, reduced hand function and joint problems were mentioned by more than 25% of all respondents as unmet needs. The proportion of patients treated in the past year by a health professional who were satisfied with knowledge and expertise of their health professionals was 74.4%; 73% reported improved daily activities and better coping with complaints. However, 48.9% perceived that the collaboration between rheumatologist and health professional was never or only sometimes sufficient. CONCLUSION: Despite the high outcome satisfaction and good accessibility of health professionals, there are obstacles in the access to non-pharmacological care and communication barriers between health professionals and rheumatologists. BioMed Central 2020-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7393838/ /pubmed/32760879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41927-020-00142-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Stöcker, Juliane K.
Vonk, Madelon C.
van den Hoogen, Frank H. J.
Nijhuis-van der Sanden, Maria W. G.
Spierings, Julia
Staal, J. Bart
Satink, Ton
van den Ende, Cornelia H. M.
Room for improvement in non-pharmacological systemic sclerosis care? — a cross-sectional online survey of 650 patients
title Room for improvement in non-pharmacological systemic sclerosis care? — a cross-sectional online survey of 650 patients
title_full Room for improvement in non-pharmacological systemic sclerosis care? — a cross-sectional online survey of 650 patients
title_fullStr Room for improvement in non-pharmacological systemic sclerosis care? — a cross-sectional online survey of 650 patients
title_full_unstemmed Room for improvement in non-pharmacological systemic sclerosis care? — a cross-sectional online survey of 650 patients
title_short Room for improvement in non-pharmacological systemic sclerosis care? — a cross-sectional online survey of 650 patients
title_sort room for improvement in non-pharmacological systemic sclerosis care? — a cross-sectional online survey of 650 patients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7393838/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32760879
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41927-020-00142-7
work_keys_str_mv AT stockerjulianek roomforimprovementinnonpharmacologicalsystemicsclerosiscareacrosssectionalonlinesurveyof650patients
AT vonkmadelonc roomforimprovementinnonpharmacologicalsystemicsclerosiscareacrosssectionalonlinesurveyof650patients
AT vandenhoogenfrankhj roomforimprovementinnonpharmacologicalsystemicsclerosiscareacrosssectionalonlinesurveyof650patients
AT nijhuisvandersandenmariawg roomforimprovementinnonpharmacologicalsystemicsclerosiscareacrosssectionalonlinesurveyof650patients
AT spieringsjulia roomforimprovementinnonpharmacologicalsystemicsclerosiscareacrosssectionalonlinesurveyof650patients
AT staaljbart roomforimprovementinnonpharmacologicalsystemicsclerosiscareacrosssectionalonlinesurveyof650patients
AT satinkton roomforimprovementinnonpharmacologicalsystemicsclerosiscareacrosssectionalonlinesurveyof650patients
AT vandenendecorneliahm roomforimprovementinnonpharmacologicalsystemicsclerosiscareacrosssectionalonlinesurveyof650patients
AT roomforimprovementinnonpharmacologicalsystemicsclerosiscareacrosssectionalonlinesurveyof650patients