Cargando…

Assessment of nonnegative matrix factorization algorithms for electroencephalography spectral analysis

BACKGROUND: Nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF) has been successfully used for electroencephalography (EEG) spectral analysis. Since NMF was proposed in the 1990s, many adaptive algorithms have been developed. However, the performance of their use in EEG data analysis has not been fully compared....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hu, Guoqiang, Zhou, Tianyi, Luo, Siwen, Mahini, Reza, Xu, Jing, Chang, Yi, Cong, Fengyu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7393858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32736630
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-020-00796-x
_version_ 1783565118092607488
author Hu, Guoqiang
Zhou, Tianyi
Luo, Siwen
Mahini, Reza
Xu, Jing
Chang, Yi
Cong, Fengyu
author_facet Hu, Guoqiang
Zhou, Tianyi
Luo, Siwen
Mahini, Reza
Xu, Jing
Chang, Yi
Cong, Fengyu
author_sort Hu, Guoqiang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF) has been successfully used for electroencephalography (EEG) spectral analysis. Since NMF was proposed in the 1990s, many adaptive algorithms have been developed. However, the performance of their use in EEG data analysis has not been fully compared. Here, we provide a comparison of four NMF algorithms in terms of accuracy of estimation, stability (repeatability of the results) and time complexity of algorithms with simulated data. In the practical application of NMF algorithms, stability plays an important role, which was an emphasis in the comparison. A Hierarchical clustering algorithm was implemented to evaluate the stability of NMF algorithms. RESULTS: In simulation-based comprehensive analysis of fit, stability, accuracy of estimation and time complexity, hierarchical alternating least squares (HALS) low-rank NMF algorithm (lraNMF_HALS) outperformed the other three NMF algorithms. In the application of lraNMF_HALS for real resting-state EEG data analysis, stable and interpretable features were extracted. CONCLUSION: Based on the results of assessment, our recommendation is to use lraNMF_HALS, providing the most accurate and robust estimation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7393858
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73938582020-08-04 Assessment of nonnegative matrix factorization algorithms for electroencephalography spectral analysis Hu, Guoqiang Zhou, Tianyi Luo, Siwen Mahini, Reza Xu, Jing Chang, Yi Cong, Fengyu Biomed Eng Online Research BACKGROUND: Nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF) has been successfully used for electroencephalography (EEG) spectral analysis. Since NMF was proposed in the 1990s, many adaptive algorithms have been developed. However, the performance of their use in EEG data analysis has not been fully compared. Here, we provide a comparison of four NMF algorithms in terms of accuracy of estimation, stability (repeatability of the results) and time complexity of algorithms with simulated data. In the practical application of NMF algorithms, stability plays an important role, which was an emphasis in the comparison. A Hierarchical clustering algorithm was implemented to evaluate the stability of NMF algorithms. RESULTS: In simulation-based comprehensive analysis of fit, stability, accuracy of estimation and time complexity, hierarchical alternating least squares (HALS) low-rank NMF algorithm (lraNMF_HALS) outperformed the other three NMF algorithms. In the application of lraNMF_HALS for real resting-state EEG data analysis, stable and interpretable features were extracted. CONCLUSION: Based on the results of assessment, our recommendation is to use lraNMF_HALS, providing the most accurate and robust estimation. BioMed Central 2020-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7393858/ /pubmed/32736630 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-020-00796-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Hu, Guoqiang
Zhou, Tianyi
Luo, Siwen
Mahini, Reza
Xu, Jing
Chang, Yi
Cong, Fengyu
Assessment of nonnegative matrix factorization algorithms for electroencephalography spectral analysis
title Assessment of nonnegative matrix factorization algorithms for electroencephalography spectral analysis
title_full Assessment of nonnegative matrix factorization algorithms for electroencephalography spectral analysis
title_fullStr Assessment of nonnegative matrix factorization algorithms for electroencephalography spectral analysis
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of nonnegative matrix factorization algorithms for electroencephalography spectral analysis
title_short Assessment of nonnegative matrix factorization algorithms for electroencephalography spectral analysis
title_sort assessment of nonnegative matrix factorization algorithms for electroencephalography spectral analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7393858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32736630
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-020-00796-x
work_keys_str_mv AT huguoqiang assessmentofnonnegativematrixfactorizationalgorithmsforelectroencephalographyspectralanalysis
AT zhoutianyi assessmentofnonnegativematrixfactorizationalgorithmsforelectroencephalographyspectralanalysis
AT luosiwen assessmentofnonnegativematrixfactorizationalgorithmsforelectroencephalographyspectralanalysis
AT mahinireza assessmentofnonnegativematrixfactorizationalgorithmsforelectroencephalographyspectralanalysis
AT xujing assessmentofnonnegativematrixfactorizationalgorithmsforelectroencephalographyspectralanalysis
AT changyi assessmentofnonnegativematrixfactorizationalgorithmsforelectroencephalographyspectralanalysis
AT congfengyu assessmentofnonnegativematrixfactorizationalgorithmsforelectroencephalographyspectralanalysis