Cargando…

DICOM segmentation and STL creation for 3D printing: a process and software package comparison for osseous anatomy

BACKGROUND: Extracting and three-dimensional (3D) printing an organ in a region of interest in DICOM images typically calls for segmentation as a first step in support of 3D printing. The DICOM images are not exported to STL data immediately, but segmentation masks are exported to STL models. After...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kamio, Takashi, Suzuki, Madoka, Asaumi, Rieko, Kawai, Taisuke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7393875/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32737703
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41205-020-00069-2
_version_ 1783565121400864768
author Kamio, Takashi
Suzuki, Madoka
Asaumi, Rieko
Kawai, Taisuke
author_facet Kamio, Takashi
Suzuki, Madoka
Asaumi, Rieko
Kawai, Taisuke
author_sort Kamio, Takashi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Extracting and three-dimensional (3D) printing an organ in a region of interest in DICOM images typically calls for segmentation as a first step in support of 3D printing. The DICOM images are not exported to STL data immediately, but segmentation masks are exported to STL models. After primary and secondary processing, including noise removal and hole correction, the STL data can be 3D printed. The quality of the 3D model is directly related to the quality of the STL data. This study focuses and reports on the DICOM to STL segmentation performance for nine software packages. METHODS: Multidetector row CT scanning was performed on a dry human mandible with two 10-mm-diameter bearing balls as a phantom. The DICOM image file was then segmented and exported to an STL file using nine different commercial/open-source software packages. Once the STL models were created, the data (file) properties and the size and volume of each file were measured, and differences across the software packages were noted. Additionally, to evaluate differences between the shapes of the STL models by software package, each pair of STL models was superimposed, with the observed differences between their shapes characterized as the shape error. Results: The data (file) size of the STL file and the number of triangles that constitute each STL model were different across all software packages, but no statistically significant differences were found across software packages. The created ball STL model expanded in the X-, Y-, and Z-axis directions, with the length in the Z-axis direction (body axis direction) being slightly longer than that in the other directions. The mean shape error between software packages of the mandibular STL model was 0.11 mm, but there was no statistically significant difference between them. CONCLUSIONS: Our results revealed that there are some differences between the software packages that perform the segmentation and STL creation of the DICOM image data. In particular, the features of each software package appeared in the fine and thin areas of the osseous structures. When using these software packages, it is necessary to understand the characteristics of each.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7393875
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73938752020-08-04 DICOM segmentation and STL creation for 3D printing: a process and software package comparison for osseous anatomy Kamio, Takashi Suzuki, Madoka Asaumi, Rieko Kawai, Taisuke 3D Print Med Research BACKGROUND: Extracting and three-dimensional (3D) printing an organ in a region of interest in DICOM images typically calls for segmentation as a first step in support of 3D printing. The DICOM images are not exported to STL data immediately, but segmentation masks are exported to STL models. After primary and secondary processing, including noise removal and hole correction, the STL data can be 3D printed. The quality of the 3D model is directly related to the quality of the STL data. This study focuses and reports on the DICOM to STL segmentation performance for nine software packages. METHODS: Multidetector row CT scanning was performed on a dry human mandible with two 10-mm-diameter bearing balls as a phantom. The DICOM image file was then segmented and exported to an STL file using nine different commercial/open-source software packages. Once the STL models were created, the data (file) properties and the size and volume of each file were measured, and differences across the software packages were noted. Additionally, to evaluate differences between the shapes of the STL models by software package, each pair of STL models was superimposed, with the observed differences between their shapes characterized as the shape error. Results: The data (file) size of the STL file and the number of triangles that constitute each STL model were different across all software packages, but no statistically significant differences were found across software packages. The created ball STL model expanded in the X-, Y-, and Z-axis directions, with the length in the Z-axis direction (body axis direction) being slightly longer than that in the other directions. The mean shape error between software packages of the mandibular STL model was 0.11 mm, but there was no statistically significant difference between them. CONCLUSIONS: Our results revealed that there are some differences between the software packages that perform the segmentation and STL creation of the DICOM image data. In particular, the features of each software package appeared in the fine and thin areas of the osseous structures. When using these software packages, it is necessary to understand the characteristics of each. Springer International Publishing 2020-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7393875/ /pubmed/32737703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41205-020-00069-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Kamio, Takashi
Suzuki, Madoka
Asaumi, Rieko
Kawai, Taisuke
DICOM segmentation and STL creation for 3D printing: a process and software package comparison for osseous anatomy
title DICOM segmentation and STL creation for 3D printing: a process and software package comparison for osseous anatomy
title_full DICOM segmentation and STL creation for 3D printing: a process and software package comparison for osseous anatomy
title_fullStr DICOM segmentation and STL creation for 3D printing: a process and software package comparison for osseous anatomy
title_full_unstemmed DICOM segmentation and STL creation for 3D printing: a process and software package comparison for osseous anatomy
title_short DICOM segmentation and STL creation for 3D printing: a process and software package comparison for osseous anatomy
title_sort dicom segmentation and stl creation for 3d printing: a process and software package comparison for osseous anatomy
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7393875/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32737703
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41205-020-00069-2
work_keys_str_mv AT kamiotakashi dicomsegmentationandstlcreationfor3dprintingaprocessandsoftwarepackagecomparisonforosseousanatomy
AT suzukimadoka dicomsegmentationandstlcreationfor3dprintingaprocessandsoftwarepackagecomparisonforosseousanatomy
AT asaumirieko dicomsegmentationandstlcreationfor3dprintingaprocessandsoftwarepackagecomparisonforosseousanatomy
AT kawaitaisuke dicomsegmentationandstlcreationfor3dprintingaprocessandsoftwarepackagecomparisonforosseousanatomy