Cargando…

Comparison of Selected Anatomical and Treatment-related Diagnostic Parameters Estimated by Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Digital Periapical Radiography in Teeth with Apical Periodontitis

OBJECTIVES: To compare selected anatomical and treatment-related diagnostic parameters estimated by cone-beam computed tomography and by digital periapical radiography in teeth with apical periodontitis, and to evaluate reliability of different examiners in interpretation of images obtained by both...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gudac, Jelena, Hellén-Halme, Kristina, Venskutonis, Tadas, Puisys, Algirdas, Machiulskiene, Vita
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Stilus Optimus 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7393929/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32760477
http://dx.doi.org/10.5037/jomr.2020.11204
_version_ 1783565133710098432
author Gudac, Jelena
Hellén-Halme, Kristina
Venskutonis, Tadas
Puisys, Algirdas
Machiulskiene, Vita
author_facet Gudac, Jelena
Hellén-Halme, Kristina
Venskutonis, Tadas
Puisys, Algirdas
Machiulskiene, Vita
author_sort Gudac, Jelena
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To compare selected anatomical and treatment-related diagnostic parameters estimated by cone-beam computed tomography and by digital periapical radiography in teeth with apical periodontitis, and to evaluate reliability of different examiners in interpretation of images obtained by both methods. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Teeth with apical periodontitis were evaluated independently by 2 endodontists and 1 radiologist based on 128 cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and 162 digital periapical radiography (DPR) images. Anatomical (size, relation with root, location of periapical radiolucency) and treatment-related (canal obturation length, homogeneity, coronal seal) parameters were assessed. Fleiss kappa reflected inter-observer agreement while intra-examiner agreement was estimated by Cohen’s kappa. McNemar and McNemar-Bowker tests served for evaluation of differences between CBCT- and DPR-based estimates. RESULTS: Cohen’s kappa ranged from 0.62 to 1 for all examiners. Fleiss kappa values were nearly perfect for majority of parameters. Diagnostic discrepancy between methods was found for size of radiolucency that in 15 - 17% cases was larger, and in 25 - 28% smaller in DPR than in CBCT images. DPR revealed 20% of root canals scored as non-obturated while in CBCT - obturation present. Canal obturation was rated as homogenous by CBCT, while absent or non-homogenous by DPR, in 17 - 23%, and 11 - 14% of cases, respectively. Radiologist detected more root perforations in CBCT than in DPR images. CONCLUSIONS: Good intra- and inter-examiner agreement for anatomical and treatment-related diagnostic parameters was achieved using cone-beam computed tomography and digital periapical radiography methods and demonstrated similar diagnostic capability, although variation regarding root perforations and canal obturation quality was observed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7393929
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Stilus Optimus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73939292020-08-04 Comparison of Selected Anatomical and Treatment-related Diagnostic Parameters Estimated by Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Digital Periapical Radiography in Teeth with Apical Periodontitis Gudac, Jelena Hellén-Halme, Kristina Venskutonis, Tadas Puisys, Algirdas Machiulskiene, Vita J Oral Maxillofac Res Original Paper OBJECTIVES: To compare selected anatomical and treatment-related diagnostic parameters estimated by cone-beam computed tomography and by digital periapical radiography in teeth with apical periodontitis, and to evaluate reliability of different examiners in interpretation of images obtained by both methods. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Teeth with apical periodontitis were evaluated independently by 2 endodontists and 1 radiologist based on 128 cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and 162 digital periapical radiography (DPR) images. Anatomical (size, relation with root, location of periapical radiolucency) and treatment-related (canal obturation length, homogeneity, coronal seal) parameters were assessed. Fleiss kappa reflected inter-observer agreement while intra-examiner agreement was estimated by Cohen’s kappa. McNemar and McNemar-Bowker tests served for evaluation of differences between CBCT- and DPR-based estimates. RESULTS: Cohen’s kappa ranged from 0.62 to 1 for all examiners. Fleiss kappa values were nearly perfect for majority of parameters. Diagnostic discrepancy between methods was found for size of radiolucency that in 15 - 17% cases was larger, and in 25 - 28% smaller in DPR than in CBCT images. DPR revealed 20% of root canals scored as non-obturated while in CBCT - obturation present. Canal obturation was rated as homogenous by CBCT, while absent or non-homogenous by DPR, in 17 - 23%, and 11 - 14% of cases, respectively. Radiologist detected more root perforations in CBCT than in DPR images. CONCLUSIONS: Good intra- and inter-examiner agreement for anatomical and treatment-related diagnostic parameters was achieved using cone-beam computed tomography and digital periapical radiography methods and demonstrated similar diagnostic capability, although variation regarding root perforations and canal obturation quality was observed. Stilus Optimus 2020-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7393929/ /pubmed/32760477 http://dx.doi.org/10.5037/jomr.2020.11204 Text en Copyright © Gudac J, Hellén-Halme K, Venskutonis T, Puisys A, Machiulskiene V. Published in the JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL RESEARCH (http://www.ejomr.org), 30 June 2020. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open-access article, first published in the JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL RESEARCH, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 UnportedLicense (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work and is properly cited. The copyright, license information and link to the original publication on (http://www.ejomr.org) must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Gudac, Jelena
Hellén-Halme, Kristina
Venskutonis, Tadas
Puisys, Algirdas
Machiulskiene, Vita
Comparison of Selected Anatomical and Treatment-related Diagnostic Parameters Estimated by Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Digital Periapical Radiography in Teeth with Apical Periodontitis
title Comparison of Selected Anatomical and Treatment-related Diagnostic Parameters Estimated by Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Digital Periapical Radiography in Teeth with Apical Periodontitis
title_full Comparison of Selected Anatomical and Treatment-related Diagnostic Parameters Estimated by Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Digital Periapical Radiography in Teeth with Apical Periodontitis
title_fullStr Comparison of Selected Anatomical and Treatment-related Diagnostic Parameters Estimated by Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Digital Periapical Radiography in Teeth with Apical Periodontitis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Selected Anatomical and Treatment-related Diagnostic Parameters Estimated by Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Digital Periapical Radiography in Teeth with Apical Periodontitis
title_short Comparison of Selected Anatomical and Treatment-related Diagnostic Parameters Estimated by Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Digital Periapical Radiography in Teeth with Apical Periodontitis
title_sort comparison of selected anatomical and treatment-related diagnostic parameters estimated by cone-beam computed tomography and digital periapical radiography in teeth with apical periodontitis
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7393929/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32760477
http://dx.doi.org/10.5037/jomr.2020.11204
work_keys_str_mv AT gudacjelena comparisonofselectedanatomicalandtreatmentrelateddiagnosticparametersestimatedbyconebeamcomputedtomographyanddigitalperiapicalradiographyinteethwithapicalperiodontitis
AT hellenhalmekristina comparisonofselectedanatomicalandtreatmentrelateddiagnosticparametersestimatedbyconebeamcomputedtomographyanddigitalperiapicalradiographyinteethwithapicalperiodontitis
AT venskutonistadas comparisonofselectedanatomicalandtreatmentrelateddiagnosticparametersestimatedbyconebeamcomputedtomographyanddigitalperiapicalradiographyinteethwithapicalperiodontitis
AT puisysalgirdas comparisonofselectedanatomicalandtreatmentrelateddiagnosticparametersestimatedbyconebeamcomputedtomographyanddigitalperiapicalradiographyinteethwithapicalperiodontitis
AT machiulskienevita comparisonofselectedanatomicalandtreatmentrelateddiagnosticparametersestimatedbyconebeamcomputedtomographyanddigitalperiapicalradiographyinteethwithapicalperiodontitis