Cargando…
Correction: Cost–utility analysis of learning and coping versus standard education in cardiac rehabilitation: a randomised controlled trial with 3 years of follow-up
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
---|---|
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7394012/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32737249 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2019-001184corr1 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Cost–utility analysis of learning and coping versus standard education in cardiac rehabilitation: a randomised controlled trial with 3 years of follow-up
por: Tayyari Dehbarez, Nasrin, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Learning and coping strategies versus standard education in cardiac rehabilitation: a cost-utility analysis alongside a randomised controlled trial
por: Dehbarez, Nasrin Tayyari, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Correction to: Cost–Utility of Liraglutide Plus Standard of Care Versus Standard of Care in People with Type 2 Diabetes and Cardiovascular Risk in Thailand
por: Deerochanawong, Chaicharn, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
LC-REHAB: randomised trial assessing the effect of a new patient education method - learning and coping strategies – in cardiac rehabilitation
por: Lynggaard, Vibeke, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Correction to: Healthcare utilization and costs among intracranial meningioma patients during long-term follow-up
por: Huynh, Kevin A., et al.
Publicado: (2023)