Cargando…
A Comparative Study of the Efficacy of Levosulpiride versus Paroxetine in Premature Ejaculation
BACKGROUND: Premature ejaculation (PME) can be defined as a lack in the normal voluntary control over ejaculation. It is the most common sexual dysfunction encountered by the male populace. In general, these patients presents with distress. Hence, a novel treatment to eliminate their problem is requ...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7394097/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32792761 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_155_19 |
_version_ | 1783565168783917056 |
---|---|
author | Bathla, Manish Anjum, Shazia Singh, Angad Harshbir Ramesh, Vinutha Gupta, Parul Bhusri, Leezu |
author_facet | Bathla, Manish Anjum, Shazia Singh, Angad Harshbir Ramesh, Vinutha Gupta, Parul Bhusri, Leezu |
author_sort | Bathla, Manish |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Premature ejaculation (PME) can be defined as a lack in the normal voluntary control over ejaculation. It is the most common sexual dysfunction encountered by the male populace. In general, these patients presents with distress. Hence, a novel treatment to eliminate their problem is required. Although the role of SSRI has already been established, the high discontinuation rate and other types of sexual dysfunctions associated with SSRIs reduce their efficacy in controlling this menace. Levosulpiride is a new drug indicated in treatment of PE. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The objective is to study the efficacy of levosulpiride; paroxetine and their comparison in patients of PE. METHODOLOGY: Index of premature ejaculation (IPE) and intravaginal ejaculation latency time (IELT) were used. A total of 36 patients (18 in each group) were included. The patients were assessed at baseline; at 4 weeks’ and at 8 weeks’ interval. RESULTS: On comparison the score of IPE in domains of ejaculation control, sexual satisfaction, and the total score of IPE were statistically significant on all the three visits. However, the distress score of IPE and the IELT score were statistically not significant between the two groups. CONCLUSION: No doubt both agents are efficacious in patients of PME but paroxetine is more efficacious than levosulpiride. At the same time, levosulpiride is a lesser studied and used drug hence more research should be done for it. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7394097 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73940972020-08-12 A Comparative Study of the Efficacy of Levosulpiride versus Paroxetine in Premature Ejaculation Bathla, Manish Anjum, Shazia Singh, Angad Harshbir Ramesh, Vinutha Gupta, Parul Bhusri, Leezu J Hum Reprod Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: Premature ejaculation (PME) can be defined as a lack in the normal voluntary control over ejaculation. It is the most common sexual dysfunction encountered by the male populace. In general, these patients presents with distress. Hence, a novel treatment to eliminate their problem is required. Although the role of SSRI has already been established, the high discontinuation rate and other types of sexual dysfunctions associated with SSRIs reduce their efficacy in controlling this menace. Levosulpiride is a new drug indicated in treatment of PE. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The objective is to study the efficacy of levosulpiride; paroxetine and their comparison in patients of PE. METHODOLOGY: Index of premature ejaculation (IPE) and intravaginal ejaculation latency time (IELT) were used. A total of 36 patients (18 in each group) were included. The patients were assessed at baseline; at 4 weeks’ and at 8 weeks’ interval. RESULTS: On comparison the score of IPE in domains of ejaculation control, sexual satisfaction, and the total score of IPE were statistically significant on all the three visits. However, the distress score of IPE and the IELT score were statistically not significant between the two groups. CONCLUSION: No doubt both agents are efficacious in patients of PME but paroxetine is more efficacious than levosulpiride. At the same time, levosulpiride is a lesser studied and used drug hence more research should be done for it. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020 2020-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7394097/ /pubmed/32792761 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_155_19 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Bathla, Manish Anjum, Shazia Singh, Angad Harshbir Ramesh, Vinutha Gupta, Parul Bhusri, Leezu A Comparative Study of the Efficacy of Levosulpiride versus Paroxetine in Premature Ejaculation |
title | A Comparative Study of the Efficacy of Levosulpiride versus Paroxetine in Premature Ejaculation |
title_full | A Comparative Study of the Efficacy of Levosulpiride versus Paroxetine in Premature Ejaculation |
title_fullStr | A Comparative Study of the Efficacy of Levosulpiride versus Paroxetine in Premature Ejaculation |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparative Study of the Efficacy of Levosulpiride versus Paroxetine in Premature Ejaculation |
title_short | A Comparative Study of the Efficacy of Levosulpiride versus Paroxetine in Premature Ejaculation |
title_sort | comparative study of the efficacy of levosulpiride versus paroxetine in premature ejaculation |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7394097/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32792761 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_155_19 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bathlamanish acomparativestudyoftheefficacyoflevosulpirideversusparoxetineinprematureejaculation AT anjumshazia acomparativestudyoftheefficacyoflevosulpirideversusparoxetineinprematureejaculation AT singhangadharshbir acomparativestudyoftheefficacyoflevosulpirideversusparoxetineinprematureejaculation AT rameshvinutha acomparativestudyoftheefficacyoflevosulpirideversusparoxetineinprematureejaculation AT guptaparul acomparativestudyoftheefficacyoflevosulpirideversusparoxetineinprematureejaculation AT bhusrileezu acomparativestudyoftheefficacyoflevosulpirideversusparoxetineinprematureejaculation AT bathlamanish comparativestudyoftheefficacyoflevosulpirideversusparoxetineinprematureejaculation AT anjumshazia comparativestudyoftheefficacyoflevosulpirideversusparoxetineinprematureejaculation AT singhangadharshbir comparativestudyoftheefficacyoflevosulpirideversusparoxetineinprematureejaculation AT rameshvinutha comparativestudyoftheefficacyoflevosulpirideversusparoxetineinprematureejaculation AT guptaparul comparativestudyoftheefficacyoflevosulpirideversusparoxetineinprematureejaculation AT bhusrileezu comparativestudyoftheefficacyoflevosulpirideversusparoxetineinprematureejaculation |