Cargando…

A Comparative Study of the Efficacy of Levosulpiride versus Paroxetine in Premature Ejaculation

BACKGROUND: Premature ejaculation (PME) can be defined as a lack in the normal voluntary control over ejaculation. It is the most common sexual dysfunction encountered by the male populace. In general, these patients presents with distress. Hence, a novel treatment to eliminate their problem is requ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bathla, Manish, Anjum, Shazia, Singh, Angad Harshbir, Ramesh, Vinutha, Gupta, Parul, Bhusri, Leezu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7394097/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32792761
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_155_19
_version_ 1783565168783917056
author Bathla, Manish
Anjum, Shazia
Singh, Angad Harshbir
Ramesh, Vinutha
Gupta, Parul
Bhusri, Leezu
author_facet Bathla, Manish
Anjum, Shazia
Singh, Angad Harshbir
Ramesh, Vinutha
Gupta, Parul
Bhusri, Leezu
author_sort Bathla, Manish
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Premature ejaculation (PME) can be defined as a lack in the normal voluntary control over ejaculation. It is the most common sexual dysfunction encountered by the male populace. In general, these patients presents with distress. Hence, a novel treatment to eliminate their problem is required. Although the role of SSRI has already been established, the high discontinuation rate and other types of sexual dysfunctions associated with SSRIs reduce their efficacy in controlling this menace. Levosulpiride is a new drug indicated in treatment of PE. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The objective is to study the efficacy of levosulpiride; paroxetine and their comparison in patients of PE. METHODOLOGY: Index of premature ejaculation (IPE) and intravaginal ejaculation latency time (IELT) were used. A total of 36 patients (18 in each group) were included. The patients were assessed at baseline; at 4 weeks’ and at 8 weeks’ interval. RESULTS: On comparison the score of IPE in domains of ejaculation control, sexual satisfaction, and the total score of IPE were statistically significant on all the three visits. However, the distress score of IPE and the IELT score were statistically not significant between the two groups. CONCLUSION: No doubt both agents are efficacious in patients of PME but paroxetine is more efficacious than levosulpiride. At the same time, levosulpiride is a lesser studied and used drug hence more research should be done for it.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7394097
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73940972020-08-12 A Comparative Study of the Efficacy of Levosulpiride versus Paroxetine in Premature Ejaculation Bathla, Manish Anjum, Shazia Singh, Angad Harshbir Ramesh, Vinutha Gupta, Parul Bhusri, Leezu J Hum Reprod Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: Premature ejaculation (PME) can be defined as a lack in the normal voluntary control over ejaculation. It is the most common sexual dysfunction encountered by the male populace. In general, these patients presents with distress. Hence, a novel treatment to eliminate their problem is required. Although the role of SSRI has already been established, the high discontinuation rate and other types of sexual dysfunctions associated with SSRIs reduce their efficacy in controlling this menace. Levosulpiride is a new drug indicated in treatment of PE. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The objective is to study the efficacy of levosulpiride; paroxetine and their comparison in patients of PE. METHODOLOGY: Index of premature ejaculation (IPE) and intravaginal ejaculation latency time (IELT) were used. A total of 36 patients (18 in each group) were included. The patients were assessed at baseline; at 4 weeks’ and at 8 weeks’ interval. RESULTS: On comparison the score of IPE in domains of ejaculation control, sexual satisfaction, and the total score of IPE were statistically significant on all the three visits. However, the distress score of IPE and the IELT score were statistically not significant between the two groups. CONCLUSION: No doubt both agents are efficacious in patients of PME but paroxetine is more efficacious than levosulpiride. At the same time, levosulpiride is a lesser studied and used drug hence more research should be done for it. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020 2020-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7394097/ /pubmed/32792761 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_155_19 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Bathla, Manish
Anjum, Shazia
Singh, Angad Harshbir
Ramesh, Vinutha
Gupta, Parul
Bhusri, Leezu
A Comparative Study of the Efficacy of Levosulpiride versus Paroxetine in Premature Ejaculation
title A Comparative Study of the Efficacy of Levosulpiride versus Paroxetine in Premature Ejaculation
title_full A Comparative Study of the Efficacy of Levosulpiride versus Paroxetine in Premature Ejaculation
title_fullStr A Comparative Study of the Efficacy of Levosulpiride versus Paroxetine in Premature Ejaculation
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Study of the Efficacy of Levosulpiride versus Paroxetine in Premature Ejaculation
title_short A Comparative Study of the Efficacy of Levosulpiride versus Paroxetine in Premature Ejaculation
title_sort comparative study of the efficacy of levosulpiride versus paroxetine in premature ejaculation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7394097/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32792761
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_155_19
work_keys_str_mv AT bathlamanish acomparativestudyoftheefficacyoflevosulpirideversusparoxetineinprematureejaculation
AT anjumshazia acomparativestudyoftheefficacyoflevosulpirideversusparoxetineinprematureejaculation
AT singhangadharshbir acomparativestudyoftheefficacyoflevosulpirideversusparoxetineinprematureejaculation
AT rameshvinutha acomparativestudyoftheefficacyoflevosulpirideversusparoxetineinprematureejaculation
AT guptaparul acomparativestudyoftheefficacyoflevosulpirideversusparoxetineinprematureejaculation
AT bhusrileezu acomparativestudyoftheefficacyoflevosulpirideversusparoxetineinprematureejaculation
AT bathlamanish comparativestudyoftheefficacyoflevosulpirideversusparoxetineinprematureejaculation
AT anjumshazia comparativestudyoftheefficacyoflevosulpirideversusparoxetineinprematureejaculation
AT singhangadharshbir comparativestudyoftheefficacyoflevosulpirideversusparoxetineinprematureejaculation
AT rameshvinutha comparativestudyoftheefficacyoflevosulpirideversusparoxetineinprematureejaculation
AT guptaparul comparativestudyoftheefficacyoflevosulpirideversusparoxetineinprematureejaculation
AT bhusrileezu comparativestudyoftheefficacyoflevosulpirideversusparoxetineinprematureejaculation