Cargando…
Outcome of spinal implant-associated infections treated with or without biofilm-active antibiotics: results from a 10-year cohort study
PURPOSE: Biofilm-active antibiotics are suggested to improve the outcome of implant-associated infections; however, their role in infections after spinal instrumentation is unclear. Therefore, we evaluated the outcome of patients with spinal implant-associated infections treated with and without bio...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7395063/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32372396 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s15010-020-01435-2 |
_version_ | 1783565328250306560 |
---|---|
author | Köder, Karolin Hardt, Sebastian Gellert, Max S. Haupenthal, Judith Renz, Nora Putzier, Michael Perka, Carsten Trampuz, Andrej |
author_facet | Köder, Karolin Hardt, Sebastian Gellert, Max S. Haupenthal, Judith Renz, Nora Putzier, Michael Perka, Carsten Trampuz, Andrej |
author_sort | Köder, Karolin |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Biofilm-active antibiotics are suggested to improve the outcome of implant-associated infections; however, their role in infections after spinal instrumentation is unclear. Therefore, we evaluated the outcome of patients with spinal implant-associated infections treated with and without biofilm-active antibiotics. METHODS: The probability of infection-free survival was estimated for treatment of spinal implant-associated infections with and without biofilm-active antibiotics using the Kaplan–Meier method; Cox proportional-hazards regression model was used to identify factors associated with treatment failure. RESULTS: Among 93 included patients, early-onset infection was diagnosed in 61 (66%) and late-onset in 32 infections (34%). Thirty patients (32%) were treated with biofilm-active antibiotic therapy and 63 (68%) without it. The infection-free survival after a median follow-up of 53.7 months (range, 8 days-9.4 years) was 67% (95% confidence interval [CI], 55–82%) after 1 year and 58% (95% CI 43–71%) after 2 years. The infection-free survival after 1 and 2 years was 94% (95% CI 85–99%) and 84% (95% CI 71–93%) for patients treated with biofilm-active antibiotics, respectively, and 57% (95% CI 39–80%) and 49% (95% CI 28–61%) for those treated without biofilm-active antibiotics, respectively (p = 0.009). Treatment with biofilm-active antibiotics (hazard ratio [HR], 0.23, 95% CI 0.07–0.77), infection with Staphylococcus auras (HR, 2.19, 95% CI 1.04–4.62) and polymicrobial infection (HR, 2.44, 95% CI 1.09–6.04) were significantly associated with treatment outcome. Severe pain was observed more often in patients without biofilm-active antibiotic therapy (49% vs. 18%, p = 0.027). CONCLUSION: Treatment with biofilm-active antibiotics was associated with better treatment outcome and less postoperative pain intensity. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s15010-020-01435-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7395063 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73950632020-08-18 Outcome of spinal implant-associated infections treated with or without biofilm-active antibiotics: results from a 10-year cohort study Köder, Karolin Hardt, Sebastian Gellert, Max S. Haupenthal, Judith Renz, Nora Putzier, Michael Perka, Carsten Trampuz, Andrej Infection Original Paper PURPOSE: Biofilm-active antibiotics are suggested to improve the outcome of implant-associated infections; however, their role in infections after spinal instrumentation is unclear. Therefore, we evaluated the outcome of patients with spinal implant-associated infections treated with and without biofilm-active antibiotics. METHODS: The probability of infection-free survival was estimated for treatment of spinal implant-associated infections with and without biofilm-active antibiotics using the Kaplan–Meier method; Cox proportional-hazards regression model was used to identify factors associated with treatment failure. RESULTS: Among 93 included patients, early-onset infection was diagnosed in 61 (66%) and late-onset in 32 infections (34%). Thirty patients (32%) were treated with biofilm-active antibiotic therapy and 63 (68%) without it. The infection-free survival after a median follow-up of 53.7 months (range, 8 days-9.4 years) was 67% (95% confidence interval [CI], 55–82%) after 1 year and 58% (95% CI 43–71%) after 2 years. The infection-free survival after 1 and 2 years was 94% (95% CI 85–99%) and 84% (95% CI 71–93%) for patients treated with biofilm-active antibiotics, respectively, and 57% (95% CI 39–80%) and 49% (95% CI 28–61%) for those treated without biofilm-active antibiotics, respectively (p = 0.009). Treatment with biofilm-active antibiotics (hazard ratio [HR], 0.23, 95% CI 0.07–0.77), infection with Staphylococcus auras (HR, 2.19, 95% CI 1.04–4.62) and polymicrobial infection (HR, 2.44, 95% CI 1.09–6.04) were significantly associated with treatment outcome. Severe pain was observed more often in patients without biofilm-active antibiotic therapy (49% vs. 18%, p = 0.027). CONCLUSION: Treatment with biofilm-active antibiotics was associated with better treatment outcome and less postoperative pain intensity. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s15010-020-01435-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-05-05 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7395063/ /pubmed/32372396 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s15010-020-01435-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Köder, Karolin Hardt, Sebastian Gellert, Max S. Haupenthal, Judith Renz, Nora Putzier, Michael Perka, Carsten Trampuz, Andrej Outcome of spinal implant-associated infections treated with or without biofilm-active antibiotics: results from a 10-year cohort study |
title | Outcome of spinal implant-associated infections treated with or without biofilm-active antibiotics: results from a 10-year cohort study |
title_full | Outcome of spinal implant-associated infections treated with or without biofilm-active antibiotics: results from a 10-year cohort study |
title_fullStr | Outcome of spinal implant-associated infections treated with or without biofilm-active antibiotics: results from a 10-year cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Outcome of spinal implant-associated infections treated with or without biofilm-active antibiotics: results from a 10-year cohort study |
title_short | Outcome of spinal implant-associated infections treated with or without biofilm-active antibiotics: results from a 10-year cohort study |
title_sort | outcome of spinal implant-associated infections treated with or without biofilm-active antibiotics: results from a 10-year cohort study |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7395063/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32372396 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s15010-020-01435-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT koderkarolin outcomeofspinalimplantassociatedinfectionstreatedwithorwithoutbiofilmactiveantibioticsresultsfroma10yearcohortstudy AT hardtsebastian outcomeofspinalimplantassociatedinfectionstreatedwithorwithoutbiofilmactiveantibioticsresultsfroma10yearcohortstudy AT gellertmaxs outcomeofspinalimplantassociatedinfectionstreatedwithorwithoutbiofilmactiveantibioticsresultsfroma10yearcohortstudy AT haupenthaljudith outcomeofspinalimplantassociatedinfectionstreatedwithorwithoutbiofilmactiveantibioticsresultsfroma10yearcohortstudy AT renznora outcomeofspinalimplantassociatedinfectionstreatedwithorwithoutbiofilmactiveantibioticsresultsfroma10yearcohortstudy AT putziermichael outcomeofspinalimplantassociatedinfectionstreatedwithorwithoutbiofilmactiveantibioticsresultsfroma10yearcohortstudy AT perkacarsten outcomeofspinalimplantassociatedinfectionstreatedwithorwithoutbiofilmactiveantibioticsresultsfroma10yearcohortstudy AT trampuzandrej outcomeofspinalimplantassociatedinfectionstreatedwithorwithoutbiofilmactiveantibioticsresultsfroma10yearcohortstudy |