Cargando…

Outcome of spinal implant-associated infections treated with or without biofilm-active antibiotics: results from a 10-year cohort study

PURPOSE: Biofilm-active antibiotics are suggested to improve the outcome of implant-associated infections; however, their role in infections after spinal instrumentation is unclear. Therefore, we evaluated the outcome of patients with spinal implant-associated infections treated with and without bio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Köder, Karolin, Hardt, Sebastian, Gellert, Max S., Haupenthal, Judith, Renz, Nora, Putzier, Michael, Perka, Carsten, Trampuz, Andrej
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7395063/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32372396
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s15010-020-01435-2
_version_ 1783565328250306560
author Köder, Karolin
Hardt, Sebastian
Gellert, Max S.
Haupenthal, Judith
Renz, Nora
Putzier, Michael
Perka, Carsten
Trampuz, Andrej
author_facet Köder, Karolin
Hardt, Sebastian
Gellert, Max S.
Haupenthal, Judith
Renz, Nora
Putzier, Michael
Perka, Carsten
Trampuz, Andrej
author_sort Köder, Karolin
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Biofilm-active antibiotics are suggested to improve the outcome of implant-associated infections; however, their role in infections after spinal instrumentation is unclear. Therefore, we evaluated the outcome of patients with spinal implant-associated infections treated with and without biofilm-active antibiotics. METHODS: The probability of infection-free survival was estimated for treatment of spinal implant-associated infections with and without biofilm-active antibiotics using the Kaplan–Meier method; Cox proportional-hazards regression model was used to identify factors associated with treatment failure. RESULTS: Among 93 included patients, early-onset infection was diagnosed in 61 (66%) and late-onset in 32 infections (34%). Thirty patients (32%) were treated with biofilm-active antibiotic therapy and 63 (68%) without it. The infection-free survival after a median follow-up of 53.7 months (range, 8 days-9.4 years) was 67% (95% confidence interval [CI], 55–82%) after 1 year and 58% (95% CI 43–71%) after 2 years. The infection-free survival after 1 and 2 years was 94% (95% CI 85–99%) and 84% (95% CI 71–93%) for patients treated with biofilm-active antibiotics, respectively, and 57% (95% CI 39–80%) and 49% (95% CI 28–61%) for those treated without biofilm-active antibiotics, respectively (p = 0.009). Treatment with biofilm-active antibiotics (hazard ratio [HR], 0.23, 95% CI 0.07–0.77), infection with Staphylococcus auras (HR, 2.19, 95% CI 1.04–4.62) and polymicrobial infection (HR, 2.44, 95% CI 1.09–6.04) were significantly associated with treatment outcome. Severe pain was observed more often in patients without biofilm-active antibiotic therapy (49% vs. 18%, p = 0.027). CONCLUSION: Treatment with biofilm-active antibiotics was associated with better treatment outcome and less postoperative pain intensity. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s15010-020-01435-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7395063
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73950632020-08-18 Outcome of spinal implant-associated infections treated with or without biofilm-active antibiotics: results from a 10-year cohort study Köder, Karolin Hardt, Sebastian Gellert, Max S. Haupenthal, Judith Renz, Nora Putzier, Michael Perka, Carsten Trampuz, Andrej Infection Original Paper PURPOSE: Biofilm-active antibiotics are suggested to improve the outcome of implant-associated infections; however, their role in infections after spinal instrumentation is unclear. Therefore, we evaluated the outcome of patients with spinal implant-associated infections treated with and without biofilm-active antibiotics. METHODS: The probability of infection-free survival was estimated for treatment of spinal implant-associated infections with and without biofilm-active antibiotics using the Kaplan–Meier method; Cox proportional-hazards regression model was used to identify factors associated with treatment failure. RESULTS: Among 93 included patients, early-onset infection was diagnosed in 61 (66%) and late-onset in 32 infections (34%). Thirty patients (32%) were treated with biofilm-active antibiotic therapy and 63 (68%) without it. The infection-free survival after a median follow-up of 53.7 months (range, 8 days-9.4 years) was 67% (95% confidence interval [CI], 55–82%) after 1 year and 58% (95% CI 43–71%) after 2 years. The infection-free survival after 1 and 2 years was 94% (95% CI 85–99%) and 84% (95% CI 71–93%) for patients treated with biofilm-active antibiotics, respectively, and 57% (95% CI 39–80%) and 49% (95% CI 28–61%) for those treated without biofilm-active antibiotics, respectively (p = 0.009). Treatment with biofilm-active antibiotics (hazard ratio [HR], 0.23, 95% CI 0.07–0.77), infection with Staphylococcus auras (HR, 2.19, 95% CI 1.04–4.62) and polymicrobial infection (HR, 2.44, 95% CI 1.09–6.04) were significantly associated with treatment outcome. Severe pain was observed more often in patients without biofilm-active antibiotic therapy (49% vs. 18%, p = 0.027). CONCLUSION: Treatment with biofilm-active antibiotics was associated with better treatment outcome and less postoperative pain intensity. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s15010-020-01435-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-05-05 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7395063/ /pubmed/32372396 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s15010-020-01435-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Köder, Karolin
Hardt, Sebastian
Gellert, Max S.
Haupenthal, Judith
Renz, Nora
Putzier, Michael
Perka, Carsten
Trampuz, Andrej
Outcome of spinal implant-associated infections treated with or without biofilm-active antibiotics: results from a 10-year cohort study
title Outcome of spinal implant-associated infections treated with or without biofilm-active antibiotics: results from a 10-year cohort study
title_full Outcome of spinal implant-associated infections treated with or without biofilm-active antibiotics: results from a 10-year cohort study
title_fullStr Outcome of spinal implant-associated infections treated with or without biofilm-active antibiotics: results from a 10-year cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Outcome of spinal implant-associated infections treated with or without biofilm-active antibiotics: results from a 10-year cohort study
title_short Outcome of spinal implant-associated infections treated with or without biofilm-active antibiotics: results from a 10-year cohort study
title_sort outcome of spinal implant-associated infections treated with or without biofilm-active antibiotics: results from a 10-year cohort study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7395063/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32372396
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s15010-020-01435-2
work_keys_str_mv AT koderkarolin outcomeofspinalimplantassociatedinfectionstreatedwithorwithoutbiofilmactiveantibioticsresultsfroma10yearcohortstudy
AT hardtsebastian outcomeofspinalimplantassociatedinfectionstreatedwithorwithoutbiofilmactiveantibioticsresultsfroma10yearcohortstudy
AT gellertmaxs outcomeofspinalimplantassociatedinfectionstreatedwithorwithoutbiofilmactiveantibioticsresultsfroma10yearcohortstudy
AT haupenthaljudith outcomeofspinalimplantassociatedinfectionstreatedwithorwithoutbiofilmactiveantibioticsresultsfroma10yearcohortstudy
AT renznora outcomeofspinalimplantassociatedinfectionstreatedwithorwithoutbiofilmactiveantibioticsresultsfroma10yearcohortstudy
AT putziermichael outcomeofspinalimplantassociatedinfectionstreatedwithorwithoutbiofilmactiveantibioticsresultsfroma10yearcohortstudy
AT perkacarsten outcomeofspinalimplantassociatedinfectionstreatedwithorwithoutbiofilmactiveantibioticsresultsfroma10yearcohortstudy
AT trampuzandrej outcomeofspinalimplantassociatedinfectionstreatedwithorwithoutbiofilmactiveantibioticsresultsfroma10yearcohortstudy