Cargando…
Evaluation of a Patient-Collected Audio Audit and Feedback Quality Improvement Program on Clinician Attention to Patient Life Context and Health Care Costs in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System
IMPORTANCE: Evidence-based care plans can fail when they do not consider relevant patient life circumstances, termed contextual factors, such as a loss of social support or financial hardship. Preventing these contextual errors can reduce obstacles to effective care. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effec...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Medical Association
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7395234/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32735338 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.9644 |
_version_ | 1783565371458977792 |
---|---|
author | Weiner, Saul Schwartz, Alan Altman, Lisa Ball, Sherry Bartle, Brian Binns-Calvey, Amy Chan, Carolyn Falck-Ytter, Corinna Frenchman, Meghana Gee, Bryan Jackson, Jeffrey L. Jordan, Neil Kass, Benjamin Kelly, Brendan Safdar, Nasia Scholcoff, Cecilia Sharma, Gunjan Weaver, Frances Wopat, Maria |
author_facet | Weiner, Saul Schwartz, Alan Altman, Lisa Ball, Sherry Bartle, Brian Binns-Calvey, Amy Chan, Carolyn Falck-Ytter, Corinna Frenchman, Meghana Gee, Bryan Jackson, Jeffrey L. Jordan, Neil Kass, Benjamin Kelly, Brendan Safdar, Nasia Scholcoff, Cecilia Sharma, Gunjan Weaver, Frances Wopat, Maria |
author_sort | Weiner, Saul |
collection | PubMed |
description | IMPORTANCE: Evidence-based care plans can fail when they do not consider relevant patient life circumstances, termed contextual factors, such as a loss of social support or financial hardship. Preventing these contextual errors can reduce obstacles to effective care. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of a quality improvement program in which clinicians receive ongoing feedback on their attention to patient contextual factors. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this quality improvement study, patients at 6 Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient facilities audio recorded their primary care visits from May 2017 to May 2019. Encounters were analyzed using the Content Coding for Contextualization of Care (4C) method. A feedback intervention based on the 4C coded analysis was introduced using a stepped wedge design. In the 4C coding schema, clues that patients are struggling with contextual factors are termed contextual red flags (eg, sudden loss of control of a chronic condition), and a positive outcome is prospectively defined for each encounter as a quantifiable improvement of the contextual red flag. Data analysis was performed from May to October 2019. INTERVENTIONS: Clinicians received feedback at 2 intensity levels on their attention to patient contextual factors and on predefined patient outcomes at 4 to 6 months. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Contextual error rates, patient outcomes, and hospitalization rates and costs were measured. RESULTS: The patients (mean age, 62.0 years; 92% male) recorded 4496 encounters with 666 clinicians. At baseline, clinicians addressed 413 of 618 contextual factors in their care plans (67%). After either standard or enhanced feedback, they addressed 1707 of 2367 contextual factors (72%), a significant difference (odds ratio, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1-1.6; P = .01). In a mixed-effects logistic regression model, contextualized care planning was associated with a greater likelihood of improved outcomes (adjusted odds ratio, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.5-4.1; P < .001). In a budget analysis, estimated savings from avoided hospitalizations were $25.2 million (95% CI, $23.9-$26.6 million), at a cost of $337 242 for the intervention. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These findings suggest that patient-collected audio recordings of the medical encounter with feedback may enhance clinician attention to contextual factors, improve outcomes, and reduce hospitalizations. In addition, the intervention is associated with substantial cost savings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7395234 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | American Medical Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73952342020-08-12 Evaluation of a Patient-Collected Audio Audit and Feedback Quality Improvement Program on Clinician Attention to Patient Life Context and Health Care Costs in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System Weiner, Saul Schwartz, Alan Altman, Lisa Ball, Sherry Bartle, Brian Binns-Calvey, Amy Chan, Carolyn Falck-Ytter, Corinna Frenchman, Meghana Gee, Bryan Jackson, Jeffrey L. Jordan, Neil Kass, Benjamin Kelly, Brendan Safdar, Nasia Scholcoff, Cecilia Sharma, Gunjan Weaver, Frances Wopat, Maria JAMA Netw Open Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: Evidence-based care plans can fail when they do not consider relevant patient life circumstances, termed contextual factors, such as a loss of social support or financial hardship. Preventing these contextual errors can reduce obstacles to effective care. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of a quality improvement program in which clinicians receive ongoing feedback on their attention to patient contextual factors. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this quality improvement study, patients at 6 Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient facilities audio recorded their primary care visits from May 2017 to May 2019. Encounters were analyzed using the Content Coding for Contextualization of Care (4C) method. A feedback intervention based on the 4C coded analysis was introduced using a stepped wedge design. In the 4C coding schema, clues that patients are struggling with contextual factors are termed contextual red flags (eg, sudden loss of control of a chronic condition), and a positive outcome is prospectively defined for each encounter as a quantifiable improvement of the contextual red flag. Data analysis was performed from May to October 2019. INTERVENTIONS: Clinicians received feedback at 2 intensity levels on their attention to patient contextual factors and on predefined patient outcomes at 4 to 6 months. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Contextual error rates, patient outcomes, and hospitalization rates and costs were measured. RESULTS: The patients (mean age, 62.0 years; 92% male) recorded 4496 encounters with 666 clinicians. At baseline, clinicians addressed 413 of 618 contextual factors in their care plans (67%). After either standard or enhanced feedback, they addressed 1707 of 2367 contextual factors (72%), a significant difference (odds ratio, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1-1.6; P = .01). In a mixed-effects logistic regression model, contextualized care planning was associated with a greater likelihood of improved outcomes (adjusted odds ratio, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.5-4.1; P < .001). In a budget analysis, estimated savings from avoided hospitalizations were $25.2 million (95% CI, $23.9-$26.6 million), at a cost of $337 242 for the intervention. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These findings suggest that patient-collected audio recordings of the medical encounter with feedback may enhance clinician attention to contextual factors, improve outcomes, and reduce hospitalizations. In addition, the intervention is associated with substantial cost savings. American Medical Association 2020-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7395234/ /pubmed/32735338 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.9644 Text en Copyright 2020 Weiner S et al. JAMA Network Open. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. |
spellingShingle | Original Investigation Weiner, Saul Schwartz, Alan Altman, Lisa Ball, Sherry Bartle, Brian Binns-Calvey, Amy Chan, Carolyn Falck-Ytter, Corinna Frenchman, Meghana Gee, Bryan Jackson, Jeffrey L. Jordan, Neil Kass, Benjamin Kelly, Brendan Safdar, Nasia Scholcoff, Cecilia Sharma, Gunjan Weaver, Frances Wopat, Maria Evaluation of a Patient-Collected Audio Audit and Feedback Quality Improvement Program on Clinician Attention to Patient Life Context and Health Care Costs in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System |
title | Evaluation of a Patient-Collected Audio Audit and Feedback Quality Improvement Program on Clinician Attention to Patient Life Context and Health Care Costs in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System |
title_full | Evaluation of a Patient-Collected Audio Audit and Feedback Quality Improvement Program on Clinician Attention to Patient Life Context and Health Care Costs in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of a Patient-Collected Audio Audit and Feedback Quality Improvement Program on Clinician Attention to Patient Life Context and Health Care Costs in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of a Patient-Collected Audio Audit and Feedback Quality Improvement Program on Clinician Attention to Patient Life Context and Health Care Costs in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System |
title_short | Evaluation of a Patient-Collected Audio Audit and Feedback Quality Improvement Program on Clinician Attention to Patient Life Context and Health Care Costs in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System |
title_sort | evaluation of a patient-collected audio audit and feedback quality improvement program on clinician attention to patient life context and health care costs in the veterans affairs health care system |
topic | Original Investigation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7395234/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32735338 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.9644 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT weinersaul evaluationofapatientcollectedaudioauditandfeedbackqualityimprovementprogramonclinicianattentiontopatientlifecontextandhealthcarecostsintheveteransaffairshealthcaresystem AT schwartzalan evaluationofapatientcollectedaudioauditandfeedbackqualityimprovementprogramonclinicianattentiontopatientlifecontextandhealthcarecostsintheveteransaffairshealthcaresystem AT altmanlisa evaluationofapatientcollectedaudioauditandfeedbackqualityimprovementprogramonclinicianattentiontopatientlifecontextandhealthcarecostsintheveteransaffairshealthcaresystem AT ballsherry evaluationofapatientcollectedaudioauditandfeedbackqualityimprovementprogramonclinicianattentiontopatientlifecontextandhealthcarecostsintheveteransaffairshealthcaresystem AT bartlebrian evaluationofapatientcollectedaudioauditandfeedbackqualityimprovementprogramonclinicianattentiontopatientlifecontextandhealthcarecostsintheveteransaffairshealthcaresystem AT binnscalveyamy evaluationofapatientcollectedaudioauditandfeedbackqualityimprovementprogramonclinicianattentiontopatientlifecontextandhealthcarecostsintheveteransaffairshealthcaresystem AT chancarolyn evaluationofapatientcollectedaudioauditandfeedbackqualityimprovementprogramonclinicianattentiontopatientlifecontextandhealthcarecostsintheveteransaffairshealthcaresystem AT falckyttercorinna evaluationofapatientcollectedaudioauditandfeedbackqualityimprovementprogramonclinicianattentiontopatientlifecontextandhealthcarecostsintheveteransaffairshealthcaresystem AT frenchmanmeghana evaluationofapatientcollectedaudioauditandfeedbackqualityimprovementprogramonclinicianattentiontopatientlifecontextandhealthcarecostsintheveteransaffairshealthcaresystem AT geebryan evaluationofapatientcollectedaudioauditandfeedbackqualityimprovementprogramonclinicianattentiontopatientlifecontextandhealthcarecostsintheveteransaffairshealthcaresystem AT jacksonjeffreyl evaluationofapatientcollectedaudioauditandfeedbackqualityimprovementprogramonclinicianattentiontopatientlifecontextandhealthcarecostsintheveteransaffairshealthcaresystem AT jordanneil evaluationofapatientcollectedaudioauditandfeedbackqualityimprovementprogramonclinicianattentiontopatientlifecontextandhealthcarecostsintheveteransaffairshealthcaresystem AT kassbenjamin evaluationofapatientcollectedaudioauditandfeedbackqualityimprovementprogramonclinicianattentiontopatientlifecontextandhealthcarecostsintheveteransaffairshealthcaresystem AT kellybrendan evaluationofapatientcollectedaudioauditandfeedbackqualityimprovementprogramonclinicianattentiontopatientlifecontextandhealthcarecostsintheveteransaffairshealthcaresystem AT safdarnasia evaluationofapatientcollectedaudioauditandfeedbackqualityimprovementprogramonclinicianattentiontopatientlifecontextandhealthcarecostsintheveteransaffairshealthcaresystem AT scholcoffcecilia evaluationofapatientcollectedaudioauditandfeedbackqualityimprovementprogramonclinicianattentiontopatientlifecontextandhealthcarecostsintheveteransaffairshealthcaresystem AT sharmagunjan evaluationofapatientcollectedaudioauditandfeedbackqualityimprovementprogramonclinicianattentiontopatientlifecontextandhealthcarecostsintheveteransaffairshealthcaresystem AT weaverfrances evaluationofapatientcollectedaudioauditandfeedbackqualityimprovementprogramonclinicianattentiontopatientlifecontextandhealthcarecostsintheveteransaffairshealthcaresystem AT wopatmaria evaluationofapatientcollectedaudioauditandfeedbackqualityimprovementprogramonclinicianattentiontopatientlifecontextandhealthcarecostsintheveteransaffairshealthcaresystem |