Cargando…

Evaluation of a Patient-Collected Audio Audit and Feedback Quality Improvement Program on Clinician Attention to Patient Life Context and Health Care Costs in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System

IMPORTANCE: Evidence-based care plans can fail when they do not consider relevant patient life circumstances, termed contextual factors, such as a loss of social support or financial hardship. Preventing these contextual errors can reduce obstacles to effective care. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weiner, Saul, Schwartz, Alan, Altman, Lisa, Ball, Sherry, Bartle, Brian, Binns-Calvey, Amy, Chan, Carolyn, Falck-Ytter, Corinna, Frenchman, Meghana, Gee, Bryan, Jackson, Jeffrey L., Jordan, Neil, Kass, Benjamin, Kelly, Brendan, Safdar, Nasia, Scholcoff, Cecilia, Sharma, Gunjan, Weaver, Frances, Wopat, Maria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Association 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7395234/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32735338
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.9644
_version_ 1783565371458977792
author Weiner, Saul
Schwartz, Alan
Altman, Lisa
Ball, Sherry
Bartle, Brian
Binns-Calvey, Amy
Chan, Carolyn
Falck-Ytter, Corinna
Frenchman, Meghana
Gee, Bryan
Jackson, Jeffrey L.
Jordan, Neil
Kass, Benjamin
Kelly, Brendan
Safdar, Nasia
Scholcoff, Cecilia
Sharma, Gunjan
Weaver, Frances
Wopat, Maria
author_facet Weiner, Saul
Schwartz, Alan
Altman, Lisa
Ball, Sherry
Bartle, Brian
Binns-Calvey, Amy
Chan, Carolyn
Falck-Ytter, Corinna
Frenchman, Meghana
Gee, Bryan
Jackson, Jeffrey L.
Jordan, Neil
Kass, Benjamin
Kelly, Brendan
Safdar, Nasia
Scholcoff, Cecilia
Sharma, Gunjan
Weaver, Frances
Wopat, Maria
author_sort Weiner, Saul
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: Evidence-based care plans can fail when they do not consider relevant patient life circumstances, termed contextual factors, such as a loss of social support or financial hardship. Preventing these contextual errors can reduce obstacles to effective care. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of a quality improvement program in which clinicians receive ongoing feedback on their attention to patient contextual factors. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this quality improvement study, patients at 6 Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient facilities audio recorded their primary care visits from May 2017 to May 2019. Encounters were analyzed using the Content Coding for Contextualization of Care (4C) method. A feedback intervention based on the 4C coded analysis was introduced using a stepped wedge design. In the 4C coding schema, clues that patients are struggling with contextual factors are termed contextual red flags (eg, sudden loss of control of a chronic condition), and a positive outcome is prospectively defined for each encounter as a quantifiable improvement of the contextual red flag. Data analysis was performed from May to October 2019. INTERVENTIONS: Clinicians received feedback at 2 intensity levels on their attention to patient contextual factors and on predefined patient outcomes at 4 to 6 months. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Contextual error rates, patient outcomes, and hospitalization rates and costs were measured. RESULTS: The patients (mean age, 62.0 years; 92% male) recorded 4496 encounters with 666 clinicians. At baseline, clinicians addressed 413 of 618 contextual factors in their care plans (67%). After either standard or enhanced feedback, they addressed 1707 of 2367 contextual factors (72%), a significant difference (odds ratio, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1-1.6; P = .01). In a mixed-effects logistic regression model, contextualized care planning was associated with a greater likelihood of improved outcomes (adjusted odds ratio, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.5-4.1; P < .001). In a budget analysis, estimated savings from avoided hospitalizations were $25.2 million (95% CI, $23.9-$26.6 million), at a cost of $337 242 for the intervention. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These findings suggest that patient-collected audio recordings of the medical encounter with feedback may enhance clinician attention to contextual factors, improve outcomes, and reduce hospitalizations. In addition, the intervention is associated with substantial cost savings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7395234
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher American Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73952342020-08-12 Evaluation of a Patient-Collected Audio Audit and Feedback Quality Improvement Program on Clinician Attention to Patient Life Context and Health Care Costs in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System Weiner, Saul Schwartz, Alan Altman, Lisa Ball, Sherry Bartle, Brian Binns-Calvey, Amy Chan, Carolyn Falck-Ytter, Corinna Frenchman, Meghana Gee, Bryan Jackson, Jeffrey L. Jordan, Neil Kass, Benjamin Kelly, Brendan Safdar, Nasia Scholcoff, Cecilia Sharma, Gunjan Weaver, Frances Wopat, Maria JAMA Netw Open Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: Evidence-based care plans can fail when they do not consider relevant patient life circumstances, termed contextual factors, such as a loss of social support or financial hardship. Preventing these contextual errors can reduce obstacles to effective care. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of a quality improvement program in which clinicians receive ongoing feedback on their attention to patient contextual factors. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this quality improvement study, patients at 6 Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient facilities audio recorded their primary care visits from May 2017 to May 2019. Encounters were analyzed using the Content Coding for Contextualization of Care (4C) method. A feedback intervention based on the 4C coded analysis was introduced using a stepped wedge design. In the 4C coding schema, clues that patients are struggling with contextual factors are termed contextual red flags (eg, sudden loss of control of a chronic condition), and a positive outcome is prospectively defined for each encounter as a quantifiable improvement of the contextual red flag. Data analysis was performed from May to October 2019. INTERVENTIONS: Clinicians received feedback at 2 intensity levels on their attention to patient contextual factors and on predefined patient outcomes at 4 to 6 months. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Contextual error rates, patient outcomes, and hospitalization rates and costs were measured. RESULTS: The patients (mean age, 62.0 years; 92% male) recorded 4496 encounters with 666 clinicians. At baseline, clinicians addressed 413 of 618 contextual factors in their care plans (67%). After either standard or enhanced feedback, they addressed 1707 of 2367 contextual factors (72%), a significant difference (odds ratio, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1-1.6; P = .01). In a mixed-effects logistic regression model, contextualized care planning was associated with a greater likelihood of improved outcomes (adjusted odds ratio, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.5-4.1; P < .001). In a budget analysis, estimated savings from avoided hospitalizations were $25.2 million (95% CI, $23.9-$26.6 million), at a cost of $337 242 for the intervention. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These findings suggest that patient-collected audio recordings of the medical encounter with feedback may enhance clinician attention to contextual factors, improve outcomes, and reduce hospitalizations. In addition, the intervention is associated with substantial cost savings. American Medical Association 2020-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7395234/ /pubmed/32735338 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.9644 Text en Copyright 2020 Weiner S et al. JAMA Network Open. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Weiner, Saul
Schwartz, Alan
Altman, Lisa
Ball, Sherry
Bartle, Brian
Binns-Calvey, Amy
Chan, Carolyn
Falck-Ytter, Corinna
Frenchman, Meghana
Gee, Bryan
Jackson, Jeffrey L.
Jordan, Neil
Kass, Benjamin
Kelly, Brendan
Safdar, Nasia
Scholcoff, Cecilia
Sharma, Gunjan
Weaver, Frances
Wopat, Maria
Evaluation of a Patient-Collected Audio Audit and Feedback Quality Improvement Program on Clinician Attention to Patient Life Context and Health Care Costs in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System
title Evaluation of a Patient-Collected Audio Audit and Feedback Quality Improvement Program on Clinician Attention to Patient Life Context and Health Care Costs in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System
title_full Evaluation of a Patient-Collected Audio Audit and Feedback Quality Improvement Program on Clinician Attention to Patient Life Context and Health Care Costs in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System
title_fullStr Evaluation of a Patient-Collected Audio Audit and Feedback Quality Improvement Program on Clinician Attention to Patient Life Context and Health Care Costs in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a Patient-Collected Audio Audit and Feedback Quality Improvement Program on Clinician Attention to Patient Life Context and Health Care Costs in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System
title_short Evaluation of a Patient-Collected Audio Audit and Feedback Quality Improvement Program on Clinician Attention to Patient Life Context and Health Care Costs in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System
title_sort evaluation of a patient-collected audio audit and feedback quality improvement program on clinician attention to patient life context and health care costs in the veterans affairs health care system
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7395234/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32735338
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.9644
work_keys_str_mv AT weinersaul evaluationofapatientcollectedaudioauditandfeedbackqualityimprovementprogramonclinicianattentiontopatientlifecontextandhealthcarecostsintheveteransaffairshealthcaresystem
AT schwartzalan evaluationofapatientcollectedaudioauditandfeedbackqualityimprovementprogramonclinicianattentiontopatientlifecontextandhealthcarecostsintheveteransaffairshealthcaresystem
AT altmanlisa evaluationofapatientcollectedaudioauditandfeedbackqualityimprovementprogramonclinicianattentiontopatientlifecontextandhealthcarecostsintheveteransaffairshealthcaresystem
AT ballsherry evaluationofapatientcollectedaudioauditandfeedbackqualityimprovementprogramonclinicianattentiontopatientlifecontextandhealthcarecostsintheveteransaffairshealthcaresystem
AT bartlebrian evaluationofapatientcollectedaudioauditandfeedbackqualityimprovementprogramonclinicianattentiontopatientlifecontextandhealthcarecostsintheveteransaffairshealthcaresystem
AT binnscalveyamy evaluationofapatientcollectedaudioauditandfeedbackqualityimprovementprogramonclinicianattentiontopatientlifecontextandhealthcarecostsintheveteransaffairshealthcaresystem
AT chancarolyn evaluationofapatientcollectedaudioauditandfeedbackqualityimprovementprogramonclinicianattentiontopatientlifecontextandhealthcarecostsintheveteransaffairshealthcaresystem
AT falckyttercorinna evaluationofapatientcollectedaudioauditandfeedbackqualityimprovementprogramonclinicianattentiontopatientlifecontextandhealthcarecostsintheveteransaffairshealthcaresystem
AT frenchmanmeghana evaluationofapatientcollectedaudioauditandfeedbackqualityimprovementprogramonclinicianattentiontopatientlifecontextandhealthcarecostsintheveteransaffairshealthcaresystem
AT geebryan evaluationofapatientcollectedaudioauditandfeedbackqualityimprovementprogramonclinicianattentiontopatientlifecontextandhealthcarecostsintheveteransaffairshealthcaresystem
AT jacksonjeffreyl evaluationofapatientcollectedaudioauditandfeedbackqualityimprovementprogramonclinicianattentiontopatientlifecontextandhealthcarecostsintheveteransaffairshealthcaresystem
AT jordanneil evaluationofapatientcollectedaudioauditandfeedbackqualityimprovementprogramonclinicianattentiontopatientlifecontextandhealthcarecostsintheveteransaffairshealthcaresystem
AT kassbenjamin evaluationofapatientcollectedaudioauditandfeedbackqualityimprovementprogramonclinicianattentiontopatientlifecontextandhealthcarecostsintheveteransaffairshealthcaresystem
AT kellybrendan evaluationofapatientcollectedaudioauditandfeedbackqualityimprovementprogramonclinicianattentiontopatientlifecontextandhealthcarecostsintheveteransaffairshealthcaresystem
AT safdarnasia evaluationofapatientcollectedaudioauditandfeedbackqualityimprovementprogramonclinicianattentiontopatientlifecontextandhealthcarecostsintheveteransaffairshealthcaresystem
AT scholcoffcecilia evaluationofapatientcollectedaudioauditandfeedbackqualityimprovementprogramonclinicianattentiontopatientlifecontextandhealthcarecostsintheveteransaffairshealthcaresystem
AT sharmagunjan evaluationofapatientcollectedaudioauditandfeedbackqualityimprovementprogramonclinicianattentiontopatientlifecontextandhealthcarecostsintheveteransaffairshealthcaresystem
AT weaverfrances evaluationofapatientcollectedaudioauditandfeedbackqualityimprovementprogramonclinicianattentiontopatientlifecontextandhealthcarecostsintheveteransaffairshealthcaresystem
AT wopatmaria evaluationofapatientcollectedaudioauditandfeedbackqualityimprovementprogramonclinicianattentiontopatientlifecontextandhealthcarecostsintheveteransaffairshealthcaresystem