Cargando…

Validation of a Mobile Version of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form: An Observational Randomized Crossover Trial

BACKGROUND: The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) questionnaire is an effective tool for evaluating shoulder joint function. The development and usage of a mobile version of the ASES questionnaire has the potential to save time, money, and effort. OBJE...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hou, Jingyi, Li, Qingyue, Yu, Menglei, Li, Fangqi, Tang, Yiyong, Long, Yi, Alike, Yamuhanmode, Zhang, Yuanhao, Ali, Maslah Idiris, Zhang, Congda, Li, Weiping, Yang, Rui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7395247/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32706731
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/16758
_version_ 1783565374392893440
author Hou, Jingyi
Li, Qingyue
Yu, Menglei
Li, Fangqi
Tang, Yiyong
Long, Yi
Alike, Yamuhanmode
Zhang, Yuanhao
Ali, Maslah Idiris
Zhang, Congda
Li, Weiping
Yang, Rui
author_facet Hou, Jingyi
Li, Qingyue
Yu, Menglei
Li, Fangqi
Tang, Yiyong
Long, Yi
Alike, Yamuhanmode
Zhang, Yuanhao
Ali, Maslah Idiris
Zhang, Congda
Li, Weiping
Yang, Rui
author_sort Hou, Jingyi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) questionnaire is an effective tool for evaluating shoulder joint function. The development and usage of a mobile version of the ASES questionnaire has the potential to save time, money, and effort. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to assess the equivalence between the paper and mobile versions of the ASES questionnaire and their acceptability among patients. METHODS: The paper and mobile versions of the ASES questionnaire were used to evaluate the shoulder joint function of 50 patients with shoulder pain. This study included patients from the shoulder clinic of Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman method were used to evaluate the agreement (reliability) of the scores obtained by the two methods (paper versus mobile). RESULTS: Of the 50 patients recruited from March 2018 to May 2019, 46 (92%) completed the study. There was a high agreement between the paper and mobile versions of the ASES questionnaire (ICC=0.979, 95% CI 0.943-0.987; P<.001). The mean difference between the scores of the mobile and paper versions was 1.0, and only 1/46 (2%) had a difference greater than the minimal clinically important difference of 12 points. About 75% of patients preferred the mobile version to the paper version. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that the mobile version of the ASES questionnaire is comparable to the paper version, and has a higher patient preference. This could prove to be a useful tool for epidemiological studies and patient follow-up over longer periods of time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7395247
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73952472020-08-13 Validation of a Mobile Version of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form: An Observational Randomized Crossover Trial Hou, Jingyi Li, Qingyue Yu, Menglei Li, Fangqi Tang, Yiyong Long, Yi Alike, Yamuhanmode Zhang, Yuanhao Ali, Maslah Idiris Zhang, Congda Li, Weiping Yang, Rui JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Original Paper BACKGROUND: The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) questionnaire is an effective tool for evaluating shoulder joint function. The development and usage of a mobile version of the ASES questionnaire has the potential to save time, money, and effort. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to assess the equivalence between the paper and mobile versions of the ASES questionnaire and their acceptability among patients. METHODS: The paper and mobile versions of the ASES questionnaire were used to evaluate the shoulder joint function of 50 patients with shoulder pain. This study included patients from the shoulder clinic of Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman method were used to evaluate the agreement (reliability) of the scores obtained by the two methods (paper versus mobile). RESULTS: Of the 50 patients recruited from March 2018 to May 2019, 46 (92%) completed the study. There was a high agreement between the paper and mobile versions of the ASES questionnaire (ICC=0.979, 95% CI 0.943-0.987; P<.001). The mean difference between the scores of the mobile and paper versions was 1.0, and only 1/46 (2%) had a difference greater than the minimal clinically important difference of 12 points. About 75% of patients preferred the mobile version to the paper version. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that the mobile version of the ASES questionnaire is comparable to the paper version, and has a higher patient preference. This could prove to be a useful tool for epidemiological studies and patient follow-up over longer periods of time. JMIR Publications 2020-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7395247/ /pubmed/32706731 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/16758 Text en ©Jingyi Hou, Qingyue Li, Menglei Yu, Fangqi Li, Yiyong Tang, Yi Long, Yamuhanmode Alike, Yuanhao Zhang, Maslah Idiris Ali, Congda Zhang, Weiping Li, Rui Yang. Originally published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth (http://mhealth.jmir.org), 17.07.2020. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://mhealth.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Hou, Jingyi
Li, Qingyue
Yu, Menglei
Li, Fangqi
Tang, Yiyong
Long, Yi
Alike, Yamuhanmode
Zhang, Yuanhao
Ali, Maslah Idiris
Zhang, Congda
Li, Weiping
Yang, Rui
Validation of a Mobile Version of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form: An Observational Randomized Crossover Trial
title Validation of a Mobile Version of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form: An Observational Randomized Crossover Trial
title_full Validation of a Mobile Version of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form: An Observational Randomized Crossover Trial
title_fullStr Validation of a Mobile Version of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form: An Observational Randomized Crossover Trial
title_full_unstemmed Validation of a Mobile Version of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form: An Observational Randomized Crossover Trial
title_short Validation of a Mobile Version of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form: An Observational Randomized Crossover Trial
title_sort validation of a mobile version of the american shoulder and elbow surgeons standardized shoulder assessment form: an observational randomized crossover trial
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7395247/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32706731
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/16758
work_keys_str_mv AT houjingyi validationofamobileversionoftheamericanshoulderandelbowsurgeonsstandardizedshoulderassessmentformanobservationalrandomizedcrossovertrial
AT liqingyue validationofamobileversionoftheamericanshoulderandelbowsurgeonsstandardizedshoulderassessmentformanobservationalrandomizedcrossovertrial
AT yumenglei validationofamobileversionoftheamericanshoulderandelbowsurgeonsstandardizedshoulderassessmentformanobservationalrandomizedcrossovertrial
AT lifangqi validationofamobileversionoftheamericanshoulderandelbowsurgeonsstandardizedshoulderassessmentformanobservationalrandomizedcrossovertrial
AT tangyiyong validationofamobileversionoftheamericanshoulderandelbowsurgeonsstandardizedshoulderassessmentformanobservationalrandomizedcrossovertrial
AT longyi validationofamobileversionoftheamericanshoulderandelbowsurgeonsstandardizedshoulderassessmentformanobservationalrandomizedcrossovertrial
AT alikeyamuhanmode validationofamobileversionoftheamericanshoulderandelbowsurgeonsstandardizedshoulderassessmentformanobservationalrandomizedcrossovertrial
AT zhangyuanhao validationofamobileversionoftheamericanshoulderandelbowsurgeonsstandardizedshoulderassessmentformanobservationalrandomizedcrossovertrial
AT alimaslahidiris validationofamobileversionoftheamericanshoulderandelbowsurgeonsstandardizedshoulderassessmentformanobservationalrandomizedcrossovertrial
AT zhangcongda validationofamobileversionoftheamericanshoulderandelbowsurgeonsstandardizedshoulderassessmentformanobservationalrandomizedcrossovertrial
AT liweiping validationofamobileversionoftheamericanshoulderandelbowsurgeonsstandardizedshoulderassessmentformanobservationalrandomizedcrossovertrial
AT yangrui validationofamobileversionoftheamericanshoulderandelbowsurgeonsstandardizedshoulderassessmentformanobservationalrandomizedcrossovertrial