Cargando…
Validation of a Mobile Version of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form: An Observational Randomized Crossover Trial
BACKGROUND: The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) questionnaire is an effective tool for evaluating shoulder joint function. The development and usage of a mobile version of the ASES questionnaire has the potential to save time, money, and effort. OBJE...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7395247/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32706731 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/16758 |
_version_ | 1783565374392893440 |
---|---|
author | Hou, Jingyi Li, Qingyue Yu, Menglei Li, Fangqi Tang, Yiyong Long, Yi Alike, Yamuhanmode Zhang, Yuanhao Ali, Maslah Idiris Zhang, Congda Li, Weiping Yang, Rui |
author_facet | Hou, Jingyi Li, Qingyue Yu, Menglei Li, Fangqi Tang, Yiyong Long, Yi Alike, Yamuhanmode Zhang, Yuanhao Ali, Maslah Idiris Zhang, Congda Li, Weiping Yang, Rui |
author_sort | Hou, Jingyi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) questionnaire is an effective tool for evaluating shoulder joint function. The development and usage of a mobile version of the ASES questionnaire has the potential to save time, money, and effort. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to assess the equivalence between the paper and mobile versions of the ASES questionnaire and their acceptability among patients. METHODS: The paper and mobile versions of the ASES questionnaire were used to evaluate the shoulder joint function of 50 patients with shoulder pain. This study included patients from the shoulder clinic of Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman method were used to evaluate the agreement (reliability) of the scores obtained by the two methods (paper versus mobile). RESULTS: Of the 50 patients recruited from March 2018 to May 2019, 46 (92%) completed the study. There was a high agreement between the paper and mobile versions of the ASES questionnaire (ICC=0.979, 95% CI 0.943-0.987; P<.001). The mean difference between the scores of the mobile and paper versions was 1.0, and only 1/46 (2%) had a difference greater than the minimal clinically important difference of 12 points. About 75% of patients preferred the mobile version to the paper version. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that the mobile version of the ASES questionnaire is comparable to the paper version, and has a higher patient preference. This could prove to be a useful tool for epidemiological studies and patient follow-up over longer periods of time. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7395247 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73952472020-08-13 Validation of a Mobile Version of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form: An Observational Randomized Crossover Trial Hou, Jingyi Li, Qingyue Yu, Menglei Li, Fangqi Tang, Yiyong Long, Yi Alike, Yamuhanmode Zhang, Yuanhao Ali, Maslah Idiris Zhang, Congda Li, Weiping Yang, Rui JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Original Paper BACKGROUND: The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) questionnaire is an effective tool for evaluating shoulder joint function. The development and usage of a mobile version of the ASES questionnaire has the potential to save time, money, and effort. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to assess the equivalence between the paper and mobile versions of the ASES questionnaire and their acceptability among patients. METHODS: The paper and mobile versions of the ASES questionnaire were used to evaluate the shoulder joint function of 50 patients with shoulder pain. This study included patients from the shoulder clinic of Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman method were used to evaluate the agreement (reliability) of the scores obtained by the two methods (paper versus mobile). RESULTS: Of the 50 patients recruited from March 2018 to May 2019, 46 (92%) completed the study. There was a high agreement between the paper and mobile versions of the ASES questionnaire (ICC=0.979, 95% CI 0.943-0.987; P<.001). The mean difference between the scores of the mobile and paper versions was 1.0, and only 1/46 (2%) had a difference greater than the minimal clinically important difference of 12 points. About 75% of patients preferred the mobile version to the paper version. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that the mobile version of the ASES questionnaire is comparable to the paper version, and has a higher patient preference. This could prove to be a useful tool for epidemiological studies and patient follow-up over longer periods of time. JMIR Publications 2020-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7395247/ /pubmed/32706731 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/16758 Text en ©Jingyi Hou, Qingyue Li, Menglei Yu, Fangqi Li, Yiyong Tang, Yi Long, Yamuhanmode Alike, Yuanhao Zhang, Maslah Idiris Ali, Congda Zhang, Weiping Li, Rui Yang. Originally published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth (http://mhealth.jmir.org), 17.07.2020. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://mhealth.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Hou, Jingyi Li, Qingyue Yu, Menglei Li, Fangqi Tang, Yiyong Long, Yi Alike, Yamuhanmode Zhang, Yuanhao Ali, Maslah Idiris Zhang, Congda Li, Weiping Yang, Rui Validation of a Mobile Version of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form: An Observational Randomized Crossover Trial |
title | Validation of a Mobile Version of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form: An Observational Randomized Crossover Trial |
title_full | Validation of a Mobile Version of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form: An Observational Randomized Crossover Trial |
title_fullStr | Validation of a Mobile Version of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form: An Observational Randomized Crossover Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of a Mobile Version of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form: An Observational Randomized Crossover Trial |
title_short | Validation of a Mobile Version of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form: An Observational Randomized Crossover Trial |
title_sort | validation of a mobile version of the american shoulder and elbow surgeons standardized shoulder assessment form: an observational randomized crossover trial |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7395247/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32706731 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/16758 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT houjingyi validationofamobileversionoftheamericanshoulderandelbowsurgeonsstandardizedshoulderassessmentformanobservationalrandomizedcrossovertrial AT liqingyue validationofamobileversionoftheamericanshoulderandelbowsurgeonsstandardizedshoulderassessmentformanobservationalrandomizedcrossovertrial AT yumenglei validationofamobileversionoftheamericanshoulderandelbowsurgeonsstandardizedshoulderassessmentformanobservationalrandomizedcrossovertrial AT lifangqi validationofamobileversionoftheamericanshoulderandelbowsurgeonsstandardizedshoulderassessmentformanobservationalrandomizedcrossovertrial AT tangyiyong validationofamobileversionoftheamericanshoulderandelbowsurgeonsstandardizedshoulderassessmentformanobservationalrandomizedcrossovertrial AT longyi validationofamobileversionoftheamericanshoulderandelbowsurgeonsstandardizedshoulderassessmentformanobservationalrandomizedcrossovertrial AT alikeyamuhanmode validationofamobileversionoftheamericanshoulderandelbowsurgeonsstandardizedshoulderassessmentformanobservationalrandomizedcrossovertrial AT zhangyuanhao validationofamobileversionoftheamericanshoulderandelbowsurgeonsstandardizedshoulderassessmentformanobservationalrandomizedcrossovertrial AT alimaslahidiris validationofamobileversionoftheamericanshoulderandelbowsurgeonsstandardizedshoulderassessmentformanobservationalrandomizedcrossovertrial AT zhangcongda validationofamobileversionoftheamericanshoulderandelbowsurgeonsstandardizedshoulderassessmentformanobservationalrandomizedcrossovertrial AT liweiping validationofamobileversionoftheamericanshoulderandelbowsurgeonsstandardizedshoulderassessmentformanobservationalrandomizedcrossovertrial AT yangrui validationofamobileversionoftheamericanshoulderandelbowsurgeonsstandardizedshoulderassessmentformanobservationalrandomizedcrossovertrial |