Cargando…

Usage of do-not-attempt-to-resuscitate orders in a Swedish community hospital – patient involvement, documentation and compliance

BACKGROUND: To characterize patients dying in a community hospital with or without attempting cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and to describe patient involvement in, documentation of, and compliance with decisions on resuscitation (Do-not-attempt-to-resuscitate orders; DNAR). METHODS: All patien...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bertilsson, Emilie, Semark, Birgitta, Schildmeijer, Kristina, Bremer, Anders, Carlsson, Jörg
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7395331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32738915
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-020-00510-5
_version_ 1783565385264529408
author Bertilsson, Emilie
Semark, Birgitta
Schildmeijer, Kristina
Bremer, Anders
Carlsson, Jörg
author_facet Bertilsson, Emilie
Semark, Birgitta
Schildmeijer, Kristina
Bremer, Anders
Carlsson, Jörg
author_sort Bertilsson, Emilie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To characterize patients dying in a community hospital with or without attempting cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and to describe patient involvement in, documentation of, and compliance with decisions on resuscitation (Do-not-attempt-to-resuscitate orders; DNAR). METHODS: All patients who died in Kalmar County Hospital during January 1, 2016 until December 31, 2016 were included. All information from the patients’ electronic chart was analysed. RESULTS: Of 660 patients (mean age 77.7 ± 12.1 years; range 21–101; median 79; 321 (48.6%) female), 30 (4.5%) were pronounced dead in the emergency department after out-of-hospital CPR. Of the remaining 630 patients a DNAR order had been documented in 558 patients (88.6%). Seventy had no DNAR order and 2 an explicit order to do CPR. In 43 of these 70 patients CPR was unsuccessfully attempted while the remaining 27 patients died without attempting CPR. In 2 of 558 (0.36%) patients CPR was attempted despite a DNAR order in place. In 412 patients (73.8%) the DNAR order had not been discussed with neither patient nor family/friends. Moreover, in 75 cases (13.4%) neither patient nor family/friends were even informed about the decision on code status. CONCLUSIONS: In general, a large percentage of patients in our study had a DNAR order in place (88.6%). However, 27 patients (4.3%) died without CPR attempt or DNAR order. DNAR orders had not been discussed with the patient/surrogate in almost three fourths of the patients. Further work has to be done to elucidate the barriers to discussions of CPR decisions with the patient.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7395331
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73953312020-08-05 Usage of do-not-attempt-to-resuscitate orders in a Swedish community hospital – patient involvement, documentation and compliance Bertilsson, Emilie Semark, Birgitta Schildmeijer, Kristina Bremer, Anders Carlsson, Jörg BMC Med Ethics Research Article BACKGROUND: To characterize patients dying in a community hospital with or without attempting cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and to describe patient involvement in, documentation of, and compliance with decisions on resuscitation (Do-not-attempt-to-resuscitate orders; DNAR). METHODS: All patients who died in Kalmar County Hospital during January 1, 2016 until December 31, 2016 were included. All information from the patients’ electronic chart was analysed. RESULTS: Of 660 patients (mean age 77.7 ± 12.1 years; range 21–101; median 79; 321 (48.6%) female), 30 (4.5%) were pronounced dead in the emergency department after out-of-hospital CPR. Of the remaining 630 patients a DNAR order had been documented in 558 patients (88.6%). Seventy had no DNAR order and 2 an explicit order to do CPR. In 43 of these 70 patients CPR was unsuccessfully attempted while the remaining 27 patients died without attempting CPR. In 2 of 558 (0.36%) patients CPR was attempted despite a DNAR order in place. In 412 patients (73.8%) the DNAR order had not been discussed with neither patient nor family/friends. Moreover, in 75 cases (13.4%) neither patient nor family/friends were even informed about the decision on code status. CONCLUSIONS: In general, a large percentage of patients in our study had a DNAR order in place (88.6%). However, 27 patients (4.3%) died without CPR attempt or DNAR order. DNAR orders had not been discussed with the patient/surrogate in almost three fourths of the patients. Further work has to be done to elucidate the barriers to discussions of CPR decisions with the patient. BioMed Central 2020-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7395331/ /pubmed/32738915 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-020-00510-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bertilsson, Emilie
Semark, Birgitta
Schildmeijer, Kristina
Bremer, Anders
Carlsson, Jörg
Usage of do-not-attempt-to-resuscitate orders in a Swedish community hospital – patient involvement, documentation and compliance
title Usage of do-not-attempt-to-resuscitate orders in a Swedish community hospital – patient involvement, documentation and compliance
title_full Usage of do-not-attempt-to-resuscitate orders in a Swedish community hospital – patient involvement, documentation and compliance
title_fullStr Usage of do-not-attempt-to-resuscitate orders in a Swedish community hospital – patient involvement, documentation and compliance
title_full_unstemmed Usage of do-not-attempt-to-resuscitate orders in a Swedish community hospital – patient involvement, documentation and compliance
title_short Usage of do-not-attempt-to-resuscitate orders in a Swedish community hospital – patient involvement, documentation and compliance
title_sort usage of do-not-attempt-to-resuscitate orders in a swedish community hospital – patient involvement, documentation and compliance
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7395331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32738915
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-020-00510-5
work_keys_str_mv AT bertilssonemilie usageofdonotattempttoresuscitateordersinaswedishcommunityhospitalpatientinvolvementdocumentationandcompliance
AT semarkbirgitta usageofdonotattempttoresuscitateordersinaswedishcommunityhospitalpatientinvolvementdocumentationandcompliance
AT schildmeijerkristina usageofdonotattempttoresuscitateordersinaswedishcommunityhospitalpatientinvolvementdocumentationandcompliance
AT bremeranders usageofdonotattempttoresuscitateordersinaswedishcommunityhospitalpatientinvolvementdocumentationandcompliance
AT carlssonjorg usageofdonotattempttoresuscitateordersinaswedishcommunityhospitalpatientinvolvementdocumentationandcompliance