Cargando…

Increases in soil and woody biomass carbon stocks as a result of rangeland riparian restoration

BACKGROUND: Globally, vegetation in riparian zones is frequently the target of restoration efforts because of its importance in reducing the input of eroded sediment and agricultural nutrient runoff to surface waters. Here we examine the potential of riparian zone restoration to enhance carbon seque...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matzek, Virginia, Lewis, David, O’Geen, Anthony, Lennox, Michael, Hogan, Sean D., Feirer, Shane T., Eviner, Valerie, Tate, Kenneth W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7395391/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32737618
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13021-020-00150-7
_version_ 1783565398510141440
author Matzek, Virginia
Lewis, David
O’Geen, Anthony
Lennox, Michael
Hogan, Sean D.
Feirer, Shane T.
Eviner, Valerie
Tate, Kenneth W.
author_facet Matzek, Virginia
Lewis, David
O’Geen, Anthony
Lennox, Michael
Hogan, Sean D.
Feirer, Shane T.
Eviner, Valerie
Tate, Kenneth W.
author_sort Matzek, Virginia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Globally, vegetation in riparian zones is frequently the target of restoration efforts because of its importance in reducing the input of eroded sediment and agricultural nutrient runoff to surface waters. Here we examine the potential of riparian zone restoration to enhance carbon sequestration. We measured soil and woody biomass carbon stocks, as well as soil carbon properties, in a long-term chronosequence of 42 streambank revegetation projects in northern California rangelands, varying in restoration age from 1 to 45 years old. RESULTS: Where revegetation was successful, we found that soil carbon measured to 50 cm depth increased at a rate of 0.87 Mg C ha(−1) year(−1) on the floodplain and 1.12 Mg C ha(−1) year(−1) on the upper bank landform. Restored sites also exhibited trends toward increased soil carbon permanence, including an increased C:N ratio and lower fulvic acid: humic acid ratio. Tree and shrub carbon in restored sites was modeled to achieve a 50-year maximum of 187.5 Mg C ha(−1) in the channel, 279.3 Mg ha(−1) in the floodplain, and 238.66 Mg ha(−1) on the upper bank. After 20 years of restoration, the value of this carbon at current per-ton C prices would amount to $US 15,000 per km of restored stream. CONCLUSION: We conclude that revegetating rangeland streambanks for erosion control has a substantial additional benefit of mitigating global climate change, and should be considered in carbon accounting and any associated financial compensation mechanisms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7395391
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73953912020-08-05 Increases in soil and woody biomass carbon stocks as a result of rangeland riparian restoration Matzek, Virginia Lewis, David O’Geen, Anthony Lennox, Michael Hogan, Sean D. Feirer, Shane T. Eviner, Valerie Tate, Kenneth W. Carbon Balance Manag Research BACKGROUND: Globally, vegetation in riparian zones is frequently the target of restoration efforts because of its importance in reducing the input of eroded sediment and agricultural nutrient runoff to surface waters. Here we examine the potential of riparian zone restoration to enhance carbon sequestration. We measured soil and woody biomass carbon stocks, as well as soil carbon properties, in a long-term chronosequence of 42 streambank revegetation projects in northern California rangelands, varying in restoration age from 1 to 45 years old. RESULTS: Where revegetation was successful, we found that soil carbon measured to 50 cm depth increased at a rate of 0.87 Mg C ha(−1) year(−1) on the floodplain and 1.12 Mg C ha(−1) year(−1) on the upper bank landform. Restored sites also exhibited trends toward increased soil carbon permanence, including an increased C:N ratio and lower fulvic acid: humic acid ratio. Tree and shrub carbon in restored sites was modeled to achieve a 50-year maximum of 187.5 Mg C ha(−1) in the channel, 279.3 Mg ha(−1) in the floodplain, and 238.66 Mg ha(−1) on the upper bank. After 20 years of restoration, the value of this carbon at current per-ton C prices would amount to $US 15,000 per km of restored stream. CONCLUSION: We conclude that revegetating rangeland streambanks for erosion control has a substantial additional benefit of mitigating global climate change, and should be considered in carbon accounting and any associated financial compensation mechanisms. Springer International Publishing 2020-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7395391/ /pubmed/32737618 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13021-020-00150-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Matzek, Virginia
Lewis, David
O’Geen, Anthony
Lennox, Michael
Hogan, Sean D.
Feirer, Shane T.
Eviner, Valerie
Tate, Kenneth W.
Increases in soil and woody biomass carbon stocks as a result of rangeland riparian restoration
title Increases in soil and woody biomass carbon stocks as a result of rangeland riparian restoration
title_full Increases in soil and woody biomass carbon stocks as a result of rangeland riparian restoration
title_fullStr Increases in soil and woody biomass carbon stocks as a result of rangeland riparian restoration
title_full_unstemmed Increases in soil and woody biomass carbon stocks as a result of rangeland riparian restoration
title_short Increases in soil and woody biomass carbon stocks as a result of rangeland riparian restoration
title_sort increases in soil and woody biomass carbon stocks as a result of rangeland riparian restoration
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7395391/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32737618
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13021-020-00150-7
work_keys_str_mv AT matzekvirginia increasesinsoilandwoodybiomasscarbonstocksasaresultofrangelandriparianrestoration
AT lewisdavid increasesinsoilandwoodybiomasscarbonstocksasaresultofrangelandriparianrestoration
AT ogeenanthony increasesinsoilandwoodybiomasscarbonstocksasaresultofrangelandriparianrestoration
AT lennoxmichael increasesinsoilandwoodybiomasscarbonstocksasaresultofrangelandriparianrestoration
AT hoganseand increasesinsoilandwoodybiomasscarbonstocksasaresultofrangelandriparianrestoration
AT feirershanet increasesinsoilandwoodybiomasscarbonstocksasaresultofrangelandriparianrestoration
AT evinervalerie increasesinsoilandwoodybiomasscarbonstocksasaresultofrangelandriparianrestoration
AT tatekennethw increasesinsoilandwoodybiomasscarbonstocksasaresultofrangelandriparianrestoration