Cargando…

Semi-field evaluation of freestanding transfluthrin passive emanators and the BG sentinel trap as a “push-pull control strategy” against Aedes aegypti mosquitoes

BACKGROUND: Spatial repellents that drive mosquitoes away from treated areas, and odour-baited traps, that attract and kill mosquitoes, can be combined and work synergistically in a push-pull system. Push-pull systems have been shown to reduce house entry and outdoor biting rates of malaria vectors...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tambwe, Mgeni M., Moore, Sarah J., Chilumba, Hassan, Swai, Johnson K., Moore, Jason D., Stica, Caleb, Saddler, Adam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7395400/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32736580
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-020-04263-3
_version_ 1783565400529698816
author Tambwe, Mgeni M.
Moore, Sarah J.
Chilumba, Hassan
Swai, Johnson K.
Moore, Jason D.
Stica, Caleb
Saddler, Adam
author_facet Tambwe, Mgeni M.
Moore, Sarah J.
Chilumba, Hassan
Swai, Johnson K.
Moore, Jason D.
Stica, Caleb
Saddler, Adam
author_sort Tambwe, Mgeni M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Spatial repellents that drive mosquitoes away from treated areas, and odour-baited traps, that attract and kill mosquitoes, can be combined and work synergistically in a push-pull system. Push-pull systems have been shown to reduce house entry and outdoor biting rates of malaria vectors and so have the potential to control other outdoor biting mosquitoes such as Aedes aegypti that transmit arboviral diseases. In this study, semi-field experiments were conducted to evaluate whether a push-pull system could be used to reduce bites from Aedes mosquitoes. METHODS: The push and pull under investigation consisted of two freestanding transfluthrin passive emanators (FTPE) and a BG sentinel trap (BGS) respectively. The FTPE contained hessian strips treated with 5.25 g of transfluthrin active ingredient. The efficacies of FTPE and BGS alone and in combination were evaluated by human landing catch in a large semi-field system in Tanzania. We also investigated the protection of FTPE over six months. The data were analyzed using generalized linear mixed models with binomial distribution. RESULTS: Two FTPE had a protective efficacy (PE) of 61.2% (95% confidence interval (CI): 52.2–69.9%) against the human landing of Ae. aegypti. The BGS did not significantly reduce mosquito landings; the PE was 2.1% (95% CI: −2.9–7.2%). The push-pull provided a PE of 64.5% (95% CI: 59.1–69.9%). However, there was no significant difference in the PE between the push-pull and the two FTPE against Ae. aegypti (P = 0.30). The FTPE offered significant protection against Ae. aegypti at month three, with a PE of 46.4% (95% CI: 41.1–51.8%), but not at six months with a PE of 2.2% (95% CI: −9.0–14.0%). CONCLUSIONS: The PE of the FTPE and the full push-pull are similar, indicative that bite prevention is primarily due to the activity of the FTPE. While these results are encouraging for the FTPE, further work is needed for a push-pull system to be recommended for Ae. aegypti control. The three-month protection against Ae. aegypti bites suggests that FTPE would be a useful additional control tool during dengue outbreaks, that does not require regular user compliance. [Image: see text]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7395400
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73954002020-08-05 Semi-field evaluation of freestanding transfluthrin passive emanators and the BG sentinel trap as a “push-pull control strategy” against Aedes aegypti mosquitoes Tambwe, Mgeni M. Moore, Sarah J. Chilumba, Hassan Swai, Johnson K. Moore, Jason D. Stica, Caleb Saddler, Adam Parasit Vectors Research BACKGROUND: Spatial repellents that drive mosquitoes away from treated areas, and odour-baited traps, that attract and kill mosquitoes, can be combined and work synergistically in a push-pull system. Push-pull systems have been shown to reduce house entry and outdoor biting rates of malaria vectors and so have the potential to control other outdoor biting mosquitoes such as Aedes aegypti that transmit arboviral diseases. In this study, semi-field experiments were conducted to evaluate whether a push-pull system could be used to reduce bites from Aedes mosquitoes. METHODS: The push and pull under investigation consisted of two freestanding transfluthrin passive emanators (FTPE) and a BG sentinel trap (BGS) respectively. The FTPE contained hessian strips treated with 5.25 g of transfluthrin active ingredient. The efficacies of FTPE and BGS alone and in combination were evaluated by human landing catch in a large semi-field system in Tanzania. We also investigated the protection of FTPE over six months. The data were analyzed using generalized linear mixed models with binomial distribution. RESULTS: Two FTPE had a protective efficacy (PE) of 61.2% (95% confidence interval (CI): 52.2–69.9%) against the human landing of Ae. aegypti. The BGS did not significantly reduce mosquito landings; the PE was 2.1% (95% CI: −2.9–7.2%). The push-pull provided a PE of 64.5% (95% CI: 59.1–69.9%). However, there was no significant difference in the PE between the push-pull and the two FTPE against Ae. aegypti (P = 0.30). The FTPE offered significant protection against Ae. aegypti at month three, with a PE of 46.4% (95% CI: 41.1–51.8%), but not at six months with a PE of 2.2% (95% CI: −9.0–14.0%). CONCLUSIONS: The PE of the FTPE and the full push-pull are similar, indicative that bite prevention is primarily due to the activity of the FTPE. While these results are encouraging for the FTPE, further work is needed for a push-pull system to be recommended for Ae. aegypti control. The three-month protection against Ae. aegypti bites suggests that FTPE would be a useful additional control tool during dengue outbreaks, that does not require regular user compliance. [Image: see text] BioMed Central 2020-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7395400/ /pubmed/32736580 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-020-04263-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Tambwe, Mgeni M.
Moore, Sarah J.
Chilumba, Hassan
Swai, Johnson K.
Moore, Jason D.
Stica, Caleb
Saddler, Adam
Semi-field evaluation of freestanding transfluthrin passive emanators and the BG sentinel trap as a “push-pull control strategy” against Aedes aegypti mosquitoes
title Semi-field evaluation of freestanding transfluthrin passive emanators and the BG sentinel trap as a “push-pull control strategy” against Aedes aegypti mosquitoes
title_full Semi-field evaluation of freestanding transfluthrin passive emanators and the BG sentinel trap as a “push-pull control strategy” against Aedes aegypti mosquitoes
title_fullStr Semi-field evaluation of freestanding transfluthrin passive emanators and the BG sentinel trap as a “push-pull control strategy” against Aedes aegypti mosquitoes
title_full_unstemmed Semi-field evaluation of freestanding transfluthrin passive emanators and the BG sentinel trap as a “push-pull control strategy” against Aedes aegypti mosquitoes
title_short Semi-field evaluation of freestanding transfluthrin passive emanators and the BG sentinel trap as a “push-pull control strategy” against Aedes aegypti mosquitoes
title_sort semi-field evaluation of freestanding transfluthrin passive emanators and the bg sentinel trap as a “push-pull control strategy” against aedes aegypti mosquitoes
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7395400/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32736580
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-020-04263-3
work_keys_str_mv AT tambwemgenim semifieldevaluationoffreestandingtransfluthrinpassiveemanatorsandthebgsentineltrapasapushpullcontrolstrategyagainstaedesaegyptimosquitoes
AT mooresarahj semifieldevaluationoffreestandingtransfluthrinpassiveemanatorsandthebgsentineltrapasapushpullcontrolstrategyagainstaedesaegyptimosquitoes
AT chilumbahassan semifieldevaluationoffreestandingtransfluthrinpassiveemanatorsandthebgsentineltrapasapushpullcontrolstrategyagainstaedesaegyptimosquitoes
AT swaijohnsonk semifieldevaluationoffreestandingtransfluthrinpassiveemanatorsandthebgsentineltrapasapushpullcontrolstrategyagainstaedesaegyptimosquitoes
AT moorejasond semifieldevaluationoffreestandingtransfluthrinpassiveemanatorsandthebgsentineltrapasapushpullcontrolstrategyagainstaedesaegyptimosquitoes
AT sticacaleb semifieldevaluationoffreestandingtransfluthrinpassiveemanatorsandthebgsentineltrapasapushpullcontrolstrategyagainstaedesaegyptimosquitoes
AT saddleradam semifieldevaluationoffreestandingtransfluthrinpassiveemanatorsandthebgsentineltrapasapushpullcontrolstrategyagainstaedesaegyptimosquitoes