Cargando…

Physical limits of flight performance in the heaviest soaring bird

Flight costs are predicted to vary with environmental conditions, and this should ultimately determine the movement capacity and distributions of large soaring birds. Despite this, little is known about how flight effort varies with environmental parameters. We deployed bio-logging devices on the wo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Williams, H. J., Shepard, E. L. C., Holton, Mark D., Alarcón, P. A. E., Wilson, R. P., Lambertucci, S. A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: National Academy of Sciences 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7395523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32661147
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1907360117
_version_ 1783565416345370624
author Williams, H. J.
Shepard, E. L. C.
Holton, Mark D.
Alarcón, P. A. E.
Wilson, R. P.
Lambertucci, S. A.
author_facet Williams, H. J.
Shepard, E. L. C.
Holton, Mark D.
Alarcón, P. A. E.
Wilson, R. P.
Lambertucci, S. A.
author_sort Williams, H. J.
collection PubMed
description Flight costs are predicted to vary with environmental conditions, and this should ultimately determine the movement capacity and distributions of large soaring birds. Despite this, little is known about how flight effort varies with environmental parameters. We deployed bio-logging devices on the world’s heaviest soaring bird, the Andean condor (Vultur gryphus), to assess the extent to which these birds can operate without resorting to powered flight. Our records of individual wingbeats in >216 h of flight show that condors can sustain soaring across a wide range of wind and thermal conditions, flapping for only 1% of their flight time. This is among the very lowest estimated movement costs in vertebrates. One bird even flew for >5 h without flapping, covering ∼172 km. Overall, > 75% of flapping flight was associated with takeoffs. Movement between weak thermal updrafts at the start of the day also imposed a metabolic cost, with birds flapping toward the end of glides to reach ephemeral thermal updrafts. Nonetheless, the investment required was still remarkably low, and even in winter conditions with weak thermals, condors are only predicted to flap for ∼2 s per kilometer. Therefore, the overall flight effort in the largest soaring birds appears to be constrained by the requirements for takeoff.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7395523
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher National Academy of Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73955232020-08-07 Physical limits of flight performance in the heaviest soaring bird Williams, H. J. Shepard, E. L. C. Holton, Mark D. Alarcón, P. A. E. Wilson, R. P. Lambertucci, S. A. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Biological Sciences Flight costs are predicted to vary with environmental conditions, and this should ultimately determine the movement capacity and distributions of large soaring birds. Despite this, little is known about how flight effort varies with environmental parameters. We deployed bio-logging devices on the world’s heaviest soaring bird, the Andean condor (Vultur gryphus), to assess the extent to which these birds can operate without resorting to powered flight. Our records of individual wingbeats in >216 h of flight show that condors can sustain soaring across a wide range of wind and thermal conditions, flapping for only 1% of their flight time. This is among the very lowest estimated movement costs in vertebrates. One bird even flew for >5 h without flapping, covering ∼172 km. Overall, > 75% of flapping flight was associated with takeoffs. Movement between weak thermal updrafts at the start of the day also imposed a metabolic cost, with birds flapping toward the end of glides to reach ephemeral thermal updrafts. Nonetheless, the investment required was still remarkably low, and even in winter conditions with weak thermals, condors are only predicted to flap for ∼2 s per kilometer. Therefore, the overall flight effort in the largest soaring birds appears to be constrained by the requirements for takeoff. National Academy of Sciences 2020-07-28 2020-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7395523/ /pubmed/32661147 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1907360117 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by PNAS. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Biological Sciences
Williams, H. J.
Shepard, E. L. C.
Holton, Mark D.
Alarcón, P. A. E.
Wilson, R. P.
Lambertucci, S. A.
Physical limits of flight performance in the heaviest soaring bird
title Physical limits of flight performance in the heaviest soaring bird
title_full Physical limits of flight performance in the heaviest soaring bird
title_fullStr Physical limits of flight performance in the heaviest soaring bird
title_full_unstemmed Physical limits of flight performance in the heaviest soaring bird
title_short Physical limits of flight performance in the heaviest soaring bird
title_sort physical limits of flight performance in the heaviest soaring bird
topic Biological Sciences
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7395523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32661147
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1907360117
work_keys_str_mv AT williamshj physicallimitsofflightperformanceintheheaviestsoaringbird
AT shepardelc physicallimitsofflightperformanceintheheaviestsoaringbird
AT holtonmarkd physicallimitsofflightperformanceintheheaviestsoaringbird
AT alarconpae physicallimitsofflightperformanceintheheaviestsoaringbird
AT wilsonrp physicallimitsofflightperformanceintheheaviestsoaringbird
AT lambertuccisa physicallimitsofflightperformanceintheheaviestsoaringbird