Cargando…

The Impact of Beta Blockers on Survival in Heart Transplant Recipients: Insights from the Zabrze HTx Registry

INTRODUCTION: The data assessing the impact of beta blocker (BB) medication on survival in patients after heart transplantation (HTx) are scarce and unequivocal; therefore, we investigated this population. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the HTx Zabrze Registry of 380 consecutive patients who s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kubiak, Grzegorz M., Kwieciński, Radosław, Ciarka, Agnieszka, Tukiendorf, Andrzej, Przybyłowski, Piotr, Hrapkowicz, Tomasz, Zembala, Michał O.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7396039/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32774914
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/5190248
_version_ 1783565507303047168
author Kubiak, Grzegorz M.
Kwieciński, Radosław
Ciarka, Agnieszka
Tukiendorf, Andrzej
Przybyłowski, Piotr
Hrapkowicz, Tomasz
Zembala, Michał O.
author_facet Kubiak, Grzegorz M.
Kwieciński, Radosław
Ciarka, Agnieszka
Tukiendorf, Andrzej
Przybyłowski, Piotr
Hrapkowicz, Tomasz
Zembala, Michał O.
author_sort Kubiak, Grzegorz M.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The data assessing the impact of beta blocker (BB) medication on survival in patients after heart transplantation (HTx) are scarce and unequivocal; therefore, we investigated this population. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the HTx Zabrze Registry of 380 consecutive patients who survived the 30-day postoperative period. RESULTS: The percentage of patients from the entire cohort taking BBs was as follows: atenolol 24 (17%), bisoprolol 67 (49%), carvedilol 11 (8%), metoprolol 28 (20%), and nebivolol 8 (6%). The patients receiving BBs were older (56.94 ± 14.68 years vs. 52.70 ± 15.35 years, p=0.008) and experienced an onset of HTx earlier in years (11.65 ± 7.04 vs. 7.24 ± 5.78 p ≤ 0.001). They also had higher hematocrit (0.40 ± 0.05 vs. 0.39 ± 0.05, p=0.022) and red blood cells (4.63 (10(6)/μl) ± 0.71 vs. 4.45 (10(6)/μl) ± 0.68, p=0.015). Survival according to BB medication did not differ among the groups (p=0.655) (log-rank test). Univariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis revealed that the following parameters were associated with unfavorable diagnosis: serum concentration of albumin (g/l) HR: 0.87, 95% CI (0.81–0.94), p=0.0004; fibrinogen (mg/dl) HR: 1.006, 95% CI (1.002–1.008), p=0.0017; and C-reactive protein (mg/l) HR: 1.014, 95% CI (1.004–1.023), p=0.0044. CONCLUSIONS: The use of BBs in our cohort of patients after HTx was not associated with survival benefits.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7396039
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73960392020-08-07 The Impact of Beta Blockers on Survival in Heart Transplant Recipients: Insights from the Zabrze HTx Registry Kubiak, Grzegorz M. Kwieciński, Radosław Ciarka, Agnieszka Tukiendorf, Andrzej Przybyłowski, Piotr Hrapkowicz, Tomasz Zembala, Michał O. Cardiol Res Pract Research Article INTRODUCTION: The data assessing the impact of beta blocker (BB) medication on survival in patients after heart transplantation (HTx) are scarce and unequivocal; therefore, we investigated this population. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the HTx Zabrze Registry of 380 consecutive patients who survived the 30-day postoperative period. RESULTS: The percentage of patients from the entire cohort taking BBs was as follows: atenolol 24 (17%), bisoprolol 67 (49%), carvedilol 11 (8%), metoprolol 28 (20%), and nebivolol 8 (6%). The patients receiving BBs were older (56.94 ± 14.68 years vs. 52.70 ± 15.35 years, p=0.008) and experienced an onset of HTx earlier in years (11.65 ± 7.04 vs. 7.24 ± 5.78 p ≤ 0.001). They also had higher hematocrit (0.40 ± 0.05 vs. 0.39 ± 0.05, p=0.022) and red blood cells (4.63 (10(6)/μl) ± 0.71 vs. 4.45 (10(6)/μl) ± 0.68, p=0.015). Survival according to BB medication did not differ among the groups (p=0.655) (log-rank test). Univariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis revealed that the following parameters were associated with unfavorable diagnosis: serum concentration of albumin (g/l) HR: 0.87, 95% CI (0.81–0.94), p=0.0004; fibrinogen (mg/dl) HR: 1.006, 95% CI (1.002–1.008), p=0.0017; and C-reactive protein (mg/l) HR: 1.014, 95% CI (1.004–1.023), p=0.0044. CONCLUSIONS: The use of BBs in our cohort of patients after HTx was not associated with survival benefits. Hindawi 2020-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7396039/ /pubmed/32774914 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/5190248 Text en Copyright © 2020 Grzegorz M. Kubiak et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kubiak, Grzegorz M.
Kwieciński, Radosław
Ciarka, Agnieszka
Tukiendorf, Andrzej
Przybyłowski, Piotr
Hrapkowicz, Tomasz
Zembala, Michał O.
The Impact of Beta Blockers on Survival in Heart Transplant Recipients: Insights from the Zabrze HTx Registry
title The Impact of Beta Blockers on Survival in Heart Transplant Recipients: Insights from the Zabrze HTx Registry
title_full The Impact of Beta Blockers on Survival in Heart Transplant Recipients: Insights from the Zabrze HTx Registry
title_fullStr The Impact of Beta Blockers on Survival in Heart Transplant Recipients: Insights from the Zabrze HTx Registry
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of Beta Blockers on Survival in Heart Transplant Recipients: Insights from the Zabrze HTx Registry
title_short The Impact of Beta Blockers on Survival in Heart Transplant Recipients: Insights from the Zabrze HTx Registry
title_sort impact of beta blockers on survival in heart transplant recipients: insights from the zabrze htx registry
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7396039/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32774914
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/5190248
work_keys_str_mv AT kubiakgrzegorzm theimpactofbetablockersonsurvivalinhearttransplantrecipientsinsightsfromthezabrzehtxregistry
AT kwiecinskiradosław theimpactofbetablockersonsurvivalinhearttransplantrecipientsinsightsfromthezabrzehtxregistry
AT ciarkaagnieszka theimpactofbetablockersonsurvivalinhearttransplantrecipientsinsightsfromthezabrzehtxregistry
AT tukiendorfandrzej theimpactofbetablockersonsurvivalinhearttransplantrecipientsinsightsfromthezabrzehtxregistry
AT przybyłowskipiotr theimpactofbetablockersonsurvivalinhearttransplantrecipientsinsightsfromthezabrzehtxregistry
AT hrapkowicztomasz theimpactofbetablockersonsurvivalinhearttransplantrecipientsinsightsfromthezabrzehtxregistry
AT zembalamichało theimpactofbetablockersonsurvivalinhearttransplantrecipientsinsightsfromthezabrzehtxregistry
AT kubiakgrzegorzm impactofbetablockersonsurvivalinhearttransplantrecipientsinsightsfromthezabrzehtxregistry
AT kwiecinskiradosław impactofbetablockersonsurvivalinhearttransplantrecipientsinsightsfromthezabrzehtxregistry
AT ciarkaagnieszka impactofbetablockersonsurvivalinhearttransplantrecipientsinsightsfromthezabrzehtxregistry
AT tukiendorfandrzej impactofbetablockersonsurvivalinhearttransplantrecipientsinsightsfromthezabrzehtxregistry
AT przybyłowskipiotr impactofbetablockersonsurvivalinhearttransplantrecipientsinsightsfromthezabrzehtxregistry
AT hrapkowicztomasz impactofbetablockersonsurvivalinhearttransplantrecipientsinsightsfromthezabrzehtxregistry
AT zembalamichało impactofbetablockersonsurvivalinhearttransplantrecipientsinsightsfromthezabrzehtxregistry