Cargando…

The Impact of Changes in Corneal Back Surface Astigmatism on the Residual Astigmatic Refractive Error following Routine Uncomplicated Phacoemulsification

PURPOSE: To determine the significance of any association between intersessional changes in ocular residual astigmatism (RA) and astigmatism at corneal front (FSA) and back (BSA) surfaces following uneventful routine phacoemulsification. METHODS: Astigmatism was evaluated by autorefractometry and su...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tutchenko, Larysa, Patel, Sudi, Voytsekhivskyy, Oleksiy, Skovron, Mykhailo, Horak, Olha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7396088/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32774910
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/7395081
_version_ 1783565518902394880
author Tutchenko, Larysa
Patel, Sudi
Voytsekhivskyy, Oleksiy
Skovron, Mykhailo
Horak, Olha
author_facet Tutchenko, Larysa
Patel, Sudi
Voytsekhivskyy, Oleksiy
Skovron, Mykhailo
Horak, Olha
author_sort Tutchenko, Larysa
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To determine the significance of any association between intersessional changes in ocular residual astigmatism (RA) and astigmatism at corneal front (FSA) and back (BSA) surfaces following uneventful routine phacoemulsification. METHODS: Astigmatism was evaluated by autorefractometry and subjective refraction and at both the corneal surfaces with Orbscan II™ (Bausch & Lomb) over central 3 mm and 5 mm optical zones at 1, 2, and 3 months after routine phacoemulsification in 103 patients implanted with monofocal nontoric intraocular lenses (IOLs, one eye/patient). Data were subjected to vector analysis to determine the actual change (Δ) in astigmatism (power and axis) for the refractive and Orbscan II findings. RESULTS: The number of cases that attended where ΔRA was ≥0.50 DC between 1 and 2 months was 52 by autorefractometry and 36 by subjective refraction and between 2 and 3 months was 24 by autorefractometry and 19 by subjective refraction. Vector analysis revealed significant correlations between ΔFSA and ΔRA for data obtained by autorefractometry but not by subjective refraction. At all times, ΔBSA was greater than ΔFSA (p < 0.01). Key findings for ΔBSA values over the central 3 mm zone were between (A) the sine of the axis of ΔRA (y) and sine of the axis of ΔBSA (x) for the data obtained by autorefractometry (between 1 and 2 months, y = 0.749 − 0.303x, r = 0.299, n = 52, p=0.031) and subjective refraction (between 2 and 3 months, y = 0.6614 − 0.4755x, r = 0.474, n = 19, p=0.040) and (B) ΔRA (y) and ΔBSA (x) powers between 2 and 3 months postoperatively for the data obtained by autorefractometry (ΔRA = 0.118 ΔBSA + 0.681 r = 0.467, n = 24, p=0.021) and subjective refraction (ΔRA = 0.072 ΔBSA + 0.545 r = 0.510, n = 19, p=0.026). CONCLUSION: Changes in the ocular residual refractive astigmatic error after implanting a monofocal nontoric IOL are associated with changes in astigmatism at the back surface of the cornea within the central optical zone.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7396088
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73960882020-08-07 The Impact of Changes in Corneal Back Surface Astigmatism on the Residual Astigmatic Refractive Error following Routine Uncomplicated Phacoemulsification Tutchenko, Larysa Patel, Sudi Voytsekhivskyy, Oleksiy Skovron, Mykhailo Horak, Olha J Ophthalmol Research Article PURPOSE: To determine the significance of any association between intersessional changes in ocular residual astigmatism (RA) and astigmatism at corneal front (FSA) and back (BSA) surfaces following uneventful routine phacoemulsification. METHODS: Astigmatism was evaluated by autorefractometry and subjective refraction and at both the corneal surfaces with Orbscan II™ (Bausch & Lomb) over central 3 mm and 5 mm optical zones at 1, 2, and 3 months after routine phacoemulsification in 103 patients implanted with monofocal nontoric intraocular lenses (IOLs, one eye/patient). Data were subjected to vector analysis to determine the actual change (Δ) in astigmatism (power and axis) for the refractive and Orbscan II findings. RESULTS: The number of cases that attended where ΔRA was ≥0.50 DC between 1 and 2 months was 52 by autorefractometry and 36 by subjective refraction and between 2 and 3 months was 24 by autorefractometry and 19 by subjective refraction. Vector analysis revealed significant correlations between ΔFSA and ΔRA for data obtained by autorefractometry but not by subjective refraction. At all times, ΔBSA was greater than ΔFSA (p < 0.01). Key findings for ΔBSA values over the central 3 mm zone were between (A) the sine of the axis of ΔRA (y) and sine of the axis of ΔBSA (x) for the data obtained by autorefractometry (between 1 and 2 months, y = 0.749 − 0.303x, r = 0.299, n = 52, p=0.031) and subjective refraction (between 2 and 3 months, y = 0.6614 − 0.4755x, r = 0.474, n = 19, p=0.040) and (B) ΔRA (y) and ΔBSA (x) powers between 2 and 3 months postoperatively for the data obtained by autorefractometry (ΔRA = 0.118 ΔBSA + 0.681 r = 0.467, n = 24, p=0.021) and subjective refraction (ΔRA = 0.072 ΔBSA + 0.545 r = 0.510, n = 19, p=0.026). CONCLUSION: Changes in the ocular residual refractive astigmatic error after implanting a monofocal nontoric IOL are associated with changes in astigmatism at the back surface of the cornea within the central optical zone. Hindawi 2020-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7396088/ /pubmed/32774910 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/7395081 Text en Copyright © 2020 Larysa Tutchenko et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tutchenko, Larysa
Patel, Sudi
Voytsekhivskyy, Oleksiy
Skovron, Mykhailo
Horak, Olha
The Impact of Changes in Corneal Back Surface Astigmatism on the Residual Astigmatic Refractive Error following Routine Uncomplicated Phacoemulsification
title The Impact of Changes in Corneal Back Surface Astigmatism on the Residual Astigmatic Refractive Error following Routine Uncomplicated Phacoemulsification
title_full The Impact of Changes in Corneal Back Surface Astigmatism on the Residual Astigmatic Refractive Error following Routine Uncomplicated Phacoemulsification
title_fullStr The Impact of Changes in Corneal Back Surface Astigmatism on the Residual Astigmatic Refractive Error following Routine Uncomplicated Phacoemulsification
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of Changes in Corneal Back Surface Astigmatism on the Residual Astigmatic Refractive Error following Routine Uncomplicated Phacoemulsification
title_short The Impact of Changes in Corneal Back Surface Astigmatism on the Residual Astigmatic Refractive Error following Routine Uncomplicated Phacoemulsification
title_sort impact of changes in corneal back surface astigmatism on the residual astigmatic refractive error following routine uncomplicated phacoemulsification
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7396088/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32774910
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/7395081
work_keys_str_mv AT tutchenkolarysa theimpactofchangesincornealbacksurfaceastigmatismontheresidualastigmaticrefractiveerrorfollowingroutineuncomplicatedphacoemulsification
AT patelsudi theimpactofchangesincornealbacksurfaceastigmatismontheresidualastigmaticrefractiveerrorfollowingroutineuncomplicatedphacoemulsification
AT voytsekhivskyyoleksiy theimpactofchangesincornealbacksurfaceastigmatismontheresidualastigmaticrefractiveerrorfollowingroutineuncomplicatedphacoemulsification
AT skovronmykhailo theimpactofchangesincornealbacksurfaceastigmatismontheresidualastigmaticrefractiveerrorfollowingroutineuncomplicatedphacoemulsification
AT horakolha theimpactofchangesincornealbacksurfaceastigmatismontheresidualastigmaticrefractiveerrorfollowingroutineuncomplicatedphacoemulsification
AT tutchenkolarysa impactofchangesincornealbacksurfaceastigmatismontheresidualastigmaticrefractiveerrorfollowingroutineuncomplicatedphacoemulsification
AT patelsudi impactofchangesincornealbacksurfaceastigmatismontheresidualastigmaticrefractiveerrorfollowingroutineuncomplicatedphacoemulsification
AT voytsekhivskyyoleksiy impactofchangesincornealbacksurfaceastigmatismontheresidualastigmaticrefractiveerrorfollowingroutineuncomplicatedphacoemulsification
AT skovronmykhailo impactofchangesincornealbacksurfaceastigmatismontheresidualastigmaticrefractiveerrorfollowingroutineuncomplicatedphacoemulsification
AT horakolha impactofchangesincornealbacksurfaceastigmatismontheresidualastigmaticrefractiveerrorfollowingroutineuncomplicatedphacoemulsification