Cargando…

Evaluating the Performance of Various Machine Learning Algorithms to Detect Subclinical Keratoconus

PURPOSE: Keratoconus (KC) represents one of the leading causes of corneal transplantation worldwide. Detecting subclinical KC would lead to better management to avoid the need for corneal grafts, but the condition is clinically challenging to diagnose. We wished to compare eight commonly used machin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cao, Ke, Verspoor, Karin, Sahebjada, Srujana, Baird, Paul N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7396174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32818085
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.9.2.24
_version_ 1783565536593969152
author Cao, Ke
Verspoor, Karin
Sahebjada, Srujana
Baird, Paul N.
author_facet Cao, Ke
Verspoor, Karin
Sahebjada, Srujana
Baird, Paul N.
author_sort Cao, Ke
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Keratoconus (KC) represents one of the leading causes of corneal transplantation worldwide. Detecting subclinical KC would lead to better management to avoid the need for corneal grafts, but the condition is clinically challenging to diagnose. We wished to compare eight commonly used machine learning algorithms using a range of parameter combinations by applying them to our KC dataset and build models to better differentiate subclinical KC from non-KC eyes. METHODS: Oculus Pentacam was used to obtain corneal parameters on 49 subclinical KC and 39 control eyes, along with clinical and demographic parameters. Eight machine learning methods were applied to build models to differentiate subclinical KC from control eyes. Dominant algorithms were trained with all combinations of the considered parameters to select important parameter combinations. The performance of each model was evaluated and compared. RESULTS: Using a total of eleven parameters, random forest, support vector machine and k-nearest neighbors had better performance in detecting subclinical KC. The highest area under the curve of 0.97 for detecting subclinical KC was achieved using five parameters by the random forest method. The highest sensitivity (0.94) and specificity (0.90) were obtained by the support vector machine and the k-nearest neighbor model, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed machine learning algorithms can be applied to identify subclinical KC using a minimal parameter set that are routinely collected during clinical eye examination. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Machine learning algorithms can be built using routinely collected clinical parameters that will assist in the objective detection of subclinical KC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7396174
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73961742020-08-17 Evaluating the Performance of Various Machine Learning Algorithms to Detect Subclinical Keratoconus Cao, Ke Verspoor, Karin Sahebjada, Srujana Baird, Paul N. Transl Vis Sci Technol Special Issue PURPOSE: Keratoconus (KC) represents one of the leading causes of corneal transplantation worldwide. Detecting subclinical KC would lead to better management to avoid the need for corneal grafts, but the condition is clinically challenging to diagnose. We wished to compare eight commonly used machine learning algorithms using a range of parameter combinations by applying them to our KC dataset and build models to better differentiate subclinical KC from non-KC eyes. METHODS: Oculus Pentacam was used to obtain corneal parameters on 49 subclinical KC and 39 control eyes, along with clinical and demographic parameters. Eight machine learning methods were applied to build models to differentiate subclinical KC from control eyes. Dominant algorithms were trained with all combinations of the considered parameters to select important parameter combinations. The performance of each model was evaluated and compared. RESULTS: Using a total of eleven parameters, random forest, support vector machine and k-nearest neighbors had better performance in detecting subclinical KC. The highest area under the curve of 0.97 for detecting subclinical KC was achieved using five parameters by the random forest method. The highest sensitivity (0.94) and specificity (0.90) were obtained by the support vector machine and the k-nearest neighbor model, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed machine learning algorithms can be applied to identify subclinical KC using a minimal parameter set that are routinely collected during clinical eye examination. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Machine learning algorithms can be built using routinely collected clinical parameters that will assist in the objective detection of subclinical KC. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2020-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7396174/ /pubmed/32818085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.9.2.24 Text en Copyright 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Special Issue
Cao, Ke
Verspoor, Karin
Sahebjada, Srujana
Baird, Paul N.
Evaluating the Performance of Various Machine Learning Algorithms to Detect Subclinical Keratoconus
title Evaluating the Performance of Various Machine Learning Algorithms to Detect Subclinical Keratoconus
title_full Evaluating the Performance of Various Machine Learning Algorithms to Detect Subclinical Keratoconus
title_fullStr Evaluating the Performance of Various Machine Learning Algorithms to Detect Subclinical Keratoconus
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the Performance of Various Machine Learning Algorithms to Detect Subclinical Keratoconus
title_short Evaluating the Performance of Various Machine Learning Algorithms to Detect Subclinical Keratoconus
title_sort evaluating the performance of various machine learning algorithms to detect subclinical keratoconus
topic Special Issue
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7396174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32818085
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.9.2.24
work_keys_str_mv AT caoke evaluatingtheperformanceofvariousmachinelearningalgorithmstodetectsubclinicalkeratoconus
AT verspoorkarin evaluatingtheperformanceofvariousmachinelearningalgorithmstodetectsubclinicalkeratoconus
AT sahebjadasrujana evaluatingtheperformanceofvariousmachinelearningalgorithmstodetectsubclinicalkeratoconus
AT bairdpauln evaluatingtheperformanceofvariousmachinelearningalgorithmstodetectsubclinicalkeratoconus