Cargando…

Free‐breathing fat and R(2)* quantification in the liver using a stack‐of‐stars multi‐echo acquisition with respiratory‐resolved model‐based reconstruction

PURPOSE: To develop a free‐breathing hepatic fat and [Formula: see text] quantification method by extending a previously described stack‐of‐stars model‐based fat‐water separation technique with additional modeling of the transverse relaxation rate [Formula: see text]. METHODS: The proposed technique...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schneider, Manuel, Benkert, Thomas, Solomon, Eddy, Nickel, Dominik, Fenchel, Matthias, Kiefer, Berthold, Maier, Andreas, Chandarana, Hersh, Block, Kai Tobias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7396291/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32301168
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.28280
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: To develop a free‐breathing hepatic fat and [Formula: see text] quantification method by extending a previously described stack‐of‐stars model‐based fat‐water separation technique with additional modeling of the transverse relaxation rate [Formula: see text]. METHODS: The proposed technique combines motion‐robust radial sampling using a stack‐of‐stars bipolar multi‐echo 3D GRE acquisition with iterative model‐based fat‐water separation. Parallel‐Imaging and Compressed‐Sensing principles are incorporated through modeling of the coil‐sensitivity profiles and enforcement of total‐variation (TV) sparsity on estimated water, fat, and [Formula: see text] parameter maps. Water and fat signals are used to estimate the confounder‐corrected proton‐density fat fraction (PDFF). Two strategies for handling respiratory motion are described: motion‐averaged and motion‐resolved reconstruction. Both techniques were evaluated in patients (n = 14) undergoing a hepatobiliary research protocol at 3T. PDFF and [Formula: see text] parameter maps were compared to a breath‐holding Cartesian reference approach. RESULTS: Linear regression analyses demonstrated strong (r > 0.96) and significant (P ≪ .01) correlations between radial and Cartesian PDFF measurements for both the motion‐averaged reconstruction (slope: 0.90; intercept: 0.07%) and the motion‐resolved reconstruction (slope: 0.90; intercept: 0.11%). The motion‐averaged technique overestimated hepatic [Formula: see text] values (slope: 0.35; intercept: 30.2 1/s) compared to the Cartesian reference. However, performing a respiratory‐resolved reconstruction led to better [Formula: see text] value consistency (slope: 0.77; intercept: 7.5 1/s). CONCLUSIONS: The proposed techniques are promising alternatives to conventional Cartesian imaging for fat and [Formula: see text] quantification in patients with limited breath‐holding capabilities. For accurate [Formula: see text] estimation, respiratory‐resolved reconstruction should be used.