Cargando…
Can Ipilimumab restore immune response in advanced NSCLC after progression on anti‐PD‐1/PD‐L1 agents?
Anti‐PD‐1/PD‐L1 agents play a crucial part in the treatment of non‐small cell cancer (NSCLC) demonstrating improved overall response rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS). Recent studies evaluating combination treatment with anti‐PD‐1 and anti‐CTLA‐4 suggests improved outcome but also increased toxic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7396365/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32548905 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13502 |
_version_ | 1783565567327731712 |
---|---|
author | Sternschuss, Michal Peled, Nir Allen, Aaron M. Dudnik, Elizabeth Rotem, Ofer Kurman, Noga Gal, Omer Reches, Hiba Zer, Alona |
author_facet | Sternschuss, Michal Peled, Nir Allen, Aaron M. Dudnik, Elizabeth Rotem, Ofer Kurman, Noga Gal, Omer Reches, Hiba Zer, Alona |
author_sort | Sternschuss, Michal |
collection | PubMed |
description | Anti‐PD‐1/PD‐L1 agents play a crucial part in the treatment of non‐small cell cancer (NSCLC) demonstrating improved overall response rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS). Recent studies evaluating combination treatment with anti‐PD‐1 and anti‐CTLA‐4 suggests improved outcome but also increased toxicity. Evidence is scarce regarding subsequent treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPI) after progression on anti‐PD‐1/PD‐L1. A total of 15 patients were treated with a combination of anti‐PD1 agent and ipilimumab after confirmed progression of disease on anti‐PD1/PDL1 alone during 2017. Clinical data were retrieved retrospectively. Disease control rate (DCR) was defined as partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD). The overall DCR was 33.3% (n = 5); two patients with PR and three patients with SD, three of whom had prior documented disease control on anti‐PD1. The immune‐related adverse event (irAE) rate was 40% (n = 6); two patients had grade 3 AE and one patient died of pneumonitis. While the median time to progression was two months (range 0.5–16), four of the five patients with PR/SD experienced durable benefit for 8–16 months. This small retrospective cohort of heavily pretreated unselected patients suggests ipilimumab might reboost the immune response in patients with advanced NSCLC following progression of disease on anti‐PD1 therapy, while delaying exposure to the higher toxicity rates associated with upfront combination therapy. This strategy should be explored prospectively. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7396365 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73963652020-08-06 Can Ipilimumab restore immune response in advanced NSCLC after progression on anti‐PD‐1/PD‐L1 agents? Sternschuss, Michal Peled, Nir Allen, Aaron M. Dudnik, Elizabeth Rotem, Ofer Kurman, Noga Gal, Omer Reches, Hiba Zer, Alona Thorac Cancer Brief Reports Anti‐PD‐1/PD‐L1 agents play a crucial part in the treatment of non‐small cell cancer (NSCLC) demonstrating improved overall response rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS). Recent studies evaluating combination treatment with anti‐PD‐1 and anti‐CTLA‐4 suggests improved outcome but also increased toxicity. Evidence is scarce regarding subsequent treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPI) after progression on anti‐PD‐1/PD‐L1. A total of 15 patients were treated with a combination of anti‐PD1 agent and ipilimumab after confirmed progression of disease on anti‐PD1/PDL1 alone during 2017. Clinical data were retrieved retrospectively. Disease control rate (DCR) was defined as partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD). The overall DCR was 33.3% (n = 5); two patients with PR and three patients with SD, three of whom had prior documented disease control on anti‐PD1. The immune‐related adverse event (irAE) rate was 40% (n = 6); two patients had grade 3 AE and one patient died of pneumonitis. While the median time to progression was two months (range 0.5–16), four of the five patients with PR/SD experienced durable benefit for 8–16 months. This small retrospective cohort of heavily pretreated unselected patients suggests ipilimumab might reboost the immune response in patients with advanced NSCLC following progression of disease on anti‐PD1 therapy, while delaying exposure to the higher toxicity rates associated with upfront combination therapy. This strategy should be explored prospectively. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2020-06-16 2020-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7396365/ /pubmed/32548905 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13502 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Brief Reports Sternschuss, Michal Peled, Nir Allen, Aaron M. Dudnik, Elizabeth Rotem, Ofer Kurman, Noga Gal, Omer Reches, Hiba Zer, Alona Can Ipilimumab restore immune response in advanced NSCLC after progression on anti‐PD‐1/PD‐L1 agents? |
title | Can Ipilimumab restore immune response in advanced NSCLC after progression on anti‐PD‐1/PD‐L1 agents? |
title_full | Can Ipilimumab restore immune response in advanced NSCLC after progression on anti‐PD‐1/PD‐L1 agents? |
title_fullStr | Can Ipilimumab restore immune response in advanced NSCLC after progression on anti‐PD‐1/PD‐L1 agents? |
title_full_unstemmed | Can Ipilimumab restore immune response in advanced NSCLC after progression on anti‐PD‐1/PD‐L1 agents? |
title_short | Can Ipilimumab restore immune response in advanced NSCLC after progression on anti‐PD‐1/PD‐L1 agents? |
title_sort | can ipilimumab restore immune response in advanced nsclc after progression on anti‐pd‐1/pd‐l1 agents? |
topic | Brief Reports |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7396365/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32548905 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13502 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sternschussmichal canipilimumabrestoreimmuneresponseinadvancednsclcafterprogressiononantipd1pdl1agents AT pelednir canipilimumabrestoreimmuneresponseinadvancednsclcafterprogressiononantipd1pdl1agents AT allenaaronm canipilimumabrestoreimmuneresponseinadvancednsclcafterprogressiononantipd1pdl1agents AT dudnikelizabeth canipilimumabrestoreimmuneresponseinadvancednsclcafterprogressiononantipd1pdl1agents AT rotemofer canipilimumabrestoreimmuneresponseinadvancednsclcafterprogressiononantipd1pdl1agents AT kurmannoga canipilimumabrestoreimmuneresponseinadvancednsclcafterprogressiononantipd1pdl1agents AT galomer canipilimumabrestoreimmuneresponseinadvancednsclcafterprogressiononantipd1pdl1agents AT recheshiba canipilimumabrestoreimmuneresponseinadvancednsclcafterprogressiononantipd1pdl1agents AT zeralona canipilimumabrestoreimmuneresponseinadvancednsclcafterprogressiononantipd1pdl1agents |