Cargando…

Can Ipilimumab restore immune response in advanced NSCLC after progression on anti‐PD‐1/PD‐L1 agents?

Anti‐PD‐1/PD‐L1 agents play a crucial part in the treatment of non‐small cell cancer (NSCLC) demonstrating improved overall response rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS). Recent studies evaluating combination treatment with anti‐PD‐1 and anti‐CTLA‐4 suggests improved outcome but also increased toxic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sternschuss, Michal, Peled, Nir, Allen, Aaron M., Dudnik, Elizabeth, Rotem, Ofer, Kurman, Noga, Gal, Omer, Reches, Hiba, Zer, Alona
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7396365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32548905
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13502
_version_ 1783565567327731712
author Sternschuss, Michal
Peled, Nir
Allen, Aaron M.
Dudnik, Elizabeth
Rotem, Ofer
Kurman, Noga
Gal, Omer
Reches, Hiba
Zer, Alona
author_facet Sternschuss, Michal
Peled, Nir
Allen, Aaron M.
Dudnik, Elizabeth
Rotem, Ofer
Kurman, Noga
Gal, Omer
Reches, Hiba
Zer, Alona
author_sort Sternschuss, Michal
collection PubMed
description Anti‐PD‐1/PD‐L1 agents play a crucial part in the treatment of non‐small cell cancer (NSCLC) demonstrating improved overall response rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS). Recent studies evaluating combination treatment with anti‐PD‐1 and anti‐CTLA‐4 suggests improved outcome but also increased toxicity. Evidence is scarce regarding subsequent treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPI) after progression on anti‐PD‐1/PD‐L1. A total of 15 patients were treated with a combination of anti‐PD1 agent and ipilimumab after confirmed progression of disease on anti‐PD1/PDL1 alone during 2017. Clinical data were retrieved retrospectively. Disease control rate (DCR) was defined as partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD). The overall DCR was 33.3% (n = 5); two patients with PR and three patients with SD, three of whom had prior documented disease control on anti‐PD1. The immune‐related adverse event (irAE) rate was 40% (n = 6); two patients had grade 3 AE and one patient died of pneumonitis. While the median time to progression was two months (range 0.5–16), four of the five patients with PR/SD experienced durable benefit for 8–16 months. This small retrospective cohort of heavily pretreated unselected patients suggests ipilimumab might reboost the immune response in patients with advanced NSCLC following progression of disease on anti‐PD1 therapy, while delaying exposure to the higher toxicity rates associated with upfront combination therapy. This strategy should be explored prospectively.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7396365
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73963652020-08-06 Can Ipilimumab restore immune response in advanced NSCLC after progression on anti‐PD‐1/PD‐L1 agents? Sternschuss, Michal Peled, Nir Allen, Aaron M. Dudnik, Elizabeth Rotem, Ofer Kurman, Noga Gal, Omer Reches, Hiba Zer, Alona Thorac Cancer Brief Reports Anti‐PD‐1/PD‐L1 agents play a crucial part in the treatment of non‐small cell cancer (NSCLC) demonstrating improved overall response rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS). Recent studies evaluating combination treatment with anti‐PD‐1 and anti‐CTLA‐4 suggests improved outcome but also increased toxicity. Evidence is scarce regarding subsequent treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPI) after progression on anti‐PD‐1/PD‐L1. A total of 15 patients were treated with a combination of anti‐PD1 agent and ipilimumab after confirmed progression of disease on anti‐PD1/PDL1 alone during 2017. Clinical data were retrieved retrospectively. Disease control rate (DCR) was defined as partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD). The overall DCR was 33.3% (n = 5); two patients with PR and three patients with SD, three of whom had prior documented disease control on anti‐PD1. The immune‐related adverse event (irAE) rate was 40% (n = 6); two patients had grade 3 AE and one patient died of pneumonitis. While the median time to progression was two months (range 0.5–16), four of the five patients with PR/SD experienced durable benefit for 8–16 months. This small retrospective cohort of heavily pretreated unselected patients suggests ipilimumab might reboost the immune response in patients with advanced NSCLC following progression of disease on anti‐PD1 therapy, while delaying exposure to the higher toxicity rates associated with upfront combination therapy. This strategy should be explored prospectively. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2020-06-16 2020-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7396365/ /pubmed/32548905 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13502 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Brief Reports
Sternschuss, Michal
Peled, Nir
Allen, Aaron M.
Dudnik, Elizabeth
Rotem, Ofer
Kurman, Noga
Gal, Omer
Reches, Hiba
Zer, Alona
Can Ipilimumab restore immune response in advanced NSCLC after progression on anti‐PD‐1/PD‐L1 agents?
title Can Ipilimumab restore immune response in advanced NSCLC after progression on anti‐PD‐1/PD‐L1 agents?
title_full Can Ipilimumab restore immune response in advanced NSCLC after progression on anti‐PD‐1/PD‐L1 agents?
title_fullStr Can Ipilimumab restore immune response in advanced NSCLC after progression on anti‐PD‐1/PD‐L1 agents?
title_full_unstemmed Can Ipilimumab restore immune response in advanced NSCLC after progression on anti‐PD‐1/PD‐L1 agents?
title_short Can Ipilimumab restore immune response in advanced NSCLC after progression on anti‐PD‐1/PD‐L1 agents?
title_sort can ipilimumab restore immune response in advanced nsclc after progression on anti‐pd‐1/pd‐l1 agents?
topic Brief Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7396365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32548905
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13502
work_keys_str_mv AT sternschussmichal canipilimumabrestoreimmuneresponseinadvancednsclcafterprogressiononantipd1pdl1agents
AT pelednir canipilimumabrestoreimmuneresponseinadvancednsclcafterprogressiononantipd1pdl1agents
AT allenaaronm canipilimumabrestoreimmuneresponseinadvancednsclcafterprogressiononantipd1pdl1agents
AT dudnikelizabeth canipilimumabrestoreimmuneresponseinadvancednsclcafterprogressiononantipd1pdl1agents
AT rotemofer canipilimumabrestoreimmuneresponseinadvancednsclcafterprogressiononantipd1pdl1agents
AT kurmannoga canipilimumabrestoreimmuneresponseinadvancednsclcafterprogressiononantipd1pdl1agents
AT galomer canipilimumabrestoreimmuneresponseinadvancednsclcafterprogressiononantipd1pdl1agents
AT recheshiba canipilimumabrestoreimmuneresponseinadvancednsclcafterprogressiononantipd1pdl1agents
AT zeralona canipilimumabrestoreimmuneresponseinadvancednsclcafterprogressiononantipd1pdl1agents