Cargando…

Survival After Minimally Invasive vs. Open Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Background: The comparison of survival outcomes between minimally invasive surgery and open surgery for cervical cancer patients remains controversial. We evaluated the survival outcomes of cervical cancer patients who underwent different surgical approaches. Methods: A literature search was perform...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Wang, Yizi, Li, Bo, Ren, Fang, Song, Zixuan, Ouyang, Ling, Liu, Kuiran
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:	Oncology
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7396529/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32903313 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.01236

Ejemplares similares

Challenges and Controversies in the Surgical Treatment of Cervical Cancer: Open Radical Hysterectomy versus Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy
por: Röseler, Jona, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Laparoscopic vs. Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer
por: Wang, Wenhui, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Cost–Utility Analysis of Open Radical Hysterectomy Compared to Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer
por: Michaan, Nadav, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Comparison of Minimally Invasive Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: An Updated Meta-Analysis
por: Zhang, Mengting, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Survival Impacts of Perineural Invasion on Patients Under Different Radical Hysterectomies Due to Early Cervical Cancer
por: Wei, Wei-wei, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Comparison of Survival Outcomes between Minimally Invasive Surgery and Open Radical Hysterectomy in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer
por: Chen, I.-Ning, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Laparoscopic vs. Open Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Single-Institution, Propensity Score Matching Study in China
por: Yuan, Zhen, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Robotic radical hysterectomy is superior to laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and open radical hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer
por: Jin, Yue-Mei, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

A meta-analysis of survival after minimally invasive radical hysterectomy versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer: center-associated factors matter
por: Sun, Si, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Impact of the Learning Curve on the Survival of Abdominal or Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer
por: Li, Lan Ying, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Impact of surgeon learning curve in minimally invasive radical hysterectomy on early stage cervical cancer patient survival
por: Pedone Anchora, L, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Laparotomic radical hysterectomy versus minimally invasive radical hysterectomy using vaginal colpotomy for the management of stage IB1 to IIA2 cervical cancer: Survival outcomes
por: Yang, Eun Jung, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Comparison of abdominal and minimally invasive radical hysterectomy in patients with early stage cervical cancer
por: Kim, Sang Il, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

PARP Inhibitors in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Advanced Ovarian Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
por: Wang, Yizi, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Prognostic Significance of Systematic Lymphadenectomy in Patients With Optimally Debulked Advanced Ovarian Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
por: Wang, Yizi, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

The Clinical Aspects and Prognostic Factors Concerning Survival in Patients With Recurrent Cervical Cancer After Radical Hysterectomy and Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy
por: Zhu, Hui-Ting, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Survival Outcomes of Patients With Stage IB3 Cervical Cancer Who Undergo Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy Versus Radiochemotherapy
por: Li, Zhiqiang, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Minimally-Invasive Versus Abdominal Hysterectomy for Endometrial Carcinoma With Glandular or Stromal Invasion of Cervix
por: Jung, Jihee, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Survival Outcomes in Patients With 2018 FIGO Stage IA2–IIA2 Cervical Cancer Treated With Laparoscopic Versus Open Radical Hysterectomy: A Propensity Score-Weighting Analysis
por: Zhao, Wancheng, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Survival outcomes of abdominal radical hysterectomy, laparoscopic radical hysterectomy, robot-assisted radical hysterectomy and vaginal radical hysterectomy approaches for early-stage cervical cancer: a retrospective study
por: Zhang, Nina, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

The role of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: ESGE-SERGS position document and joint-statement *
Publicado: (2020)

Selection criteria and colpotomic approach for safe minimally invasive radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer
por: Kong, Tae-Wook, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Comparison of Prognosis between Minimally Invasive and Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Patients with Early-Stage Cervical Cancer
por: Tanaka, Tomohito, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Comparative analysis of robotic vs laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer
por: Chen, Li, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Surgical and oncologic outcomes after robotic radical hysterectomy as compared to open radical hysterectomy in the treatment of early cervical cancer
por: Shah, Chirag A., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Potential strategies for prevention of tumor spillage in minimally invasive radical hysterectomy
por: Bebia, Vicente, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Is it time to call for improvement in surgical techniques for minimally invasive radical hysterectomy?
por: Chuang, Linus, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

The basic principles of oncologic surgery during minimally invasive radical hysterectomy
por: Köhler, Christhardt, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Survival outcomes of minimally invasive versus open radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage IB1 to IIA2 cervical cancer: A single-center retrospective study
por: Yeon Choi, Hwa, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Necessity of Radical Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer Patients with Cervical Invasion
por: Lee, Taek Sang, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Rethinking the next step after unexpected results associated with minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early cervical cancer
por: Pyeon, Seung Yeon, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Classical radical hysterectomy and nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer
por: Makowski, Marcin, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Meta-analysis of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy, excluding robotic assisted versus open radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer
por: Marchand, Greg, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Comparative single-center study between modified laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and open radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer
por: Li, Xuqing, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

The Case Selection for Vaginal Cuff Brachytherapy in Cervical Cancer Patients After Radical Hysterectomy and External Beam Radiation Therapy
por: Lai, Ying-Lu, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Efficacy of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy vs. conventional radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Lee, Seung Hyun, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Is there a relationship between surgical proficiency and oncologic outcome of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer?
por: Ahn, Jung Hwan, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Trends in Surgical Morbidity and Survival Outcomes for Radical Hysterectomy in West China: An 11-Year Retrospective Cohort Study
por: Jing, Huining, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

A Comparison of Laparoscopies and Laparotomies for Radical Hysterectomy in Stage IA1-IB1 Cervical Cancer Patients: A Single Team With 18 Years of Experience
por: Qin, Meng, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Perioperative morbidity of different operative approaches in early cervical carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing minimally invasive versus open radical hysterectomy
por: Kampers, J., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_cp3lma1m1pateo0s198u36896d