Cargando…

Response Activation and Inhibition in Patients With Prolactinomas: An Electrophysiological Study

Impairment of executive function has been reported in patients with prolactinomas. However, few studies have investigated the electrophysiological mechanisms of response activation and response inhibition in these patients. In this study, we employ an event-related potentials (ERPs) technique to qua...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Song, Jian, Cao, Chenglong, Wang, Yu, Yao, Shun, Catalino, Michael P., Yan, Deqi, Xu, Guozheng, Ma, Lianting
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7396600/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32848659
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00170
_version_ 1783565619659014144
author Song, Jian
Cao, Chenglong
Wang, Yu
Yao, Shun
Catalino, Michael P.
Yan, Deqi
Xu, Guozheng
Ma, Lianting
author_facet Song, Jian
Cao, Chenglong
Wang, Yu
Yao, Shun
Catalino, Michael P.
Yan, Deqi
Xu, Guozheng
Ma, Lianting
author_sort Song, Jian
collection PubMed
description Impairment of executive function has been reported in patients with prolactinomas. However, few studies have investigated the electrophysiological mechanisms of response activation and response inhibition in these patients. In this study, we employ an event-related potentials (ERPs) technique to quantitatively assess response activation and inhibition before and after the surgical treatment of prolactinomas. A 64-electrode electroencephalogram (EEG) skullcap was used to record the brain activity in 20 pre-operative patients, 20 follow-up post-operative patients, and 20 healthy controls (HCs) while performing the visual Go/Nogo task. As expected, we identified P300 across all study populations that could reflect response activation and inhibition. Across the three groups, the Nogo stimuli evoked larger frontal-central P300 than the Go stimuli did. In contrast, the Go trials elicited larger parietal P300 than the Nogo trials did. The peak latency of P300 was significantly delayed in both the pre-operative and the post-operative groups compared to the HCs. The amplitude of P300 in both the Go and the Nogo conditions was significantly decreased in the pre-operative patients compared with that of the HCs. At 6 months post-operatively, the prolactinoma patients showed an increase in amplitude of P300 during both the Go and the Nogo tasks. These findings indicate that the prolactinoma patients suffer from deficits in response activation and inhibition, which could be improved by surgical treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7396600
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73966002020-08-25 Response Activation and Inhibition in Patients With Prolactinomas: An Electrophysiological Study Song, Jian Cao, Chenglong Wang, Yu Yao, Shun Catalino, Michael P. Yan, Deqi Xu, Guozheng Ma, Lianting Front Hum Neurosci Human Neuroscience Impairment of executive function has been reported in patients with prolactinomas. However, few studies have investigated the electrophysiological mechanisms of response activation and response inhibition in these patients. In this study, we employ an event-related potentials (ERPs) technique to quantitatively assess response activation and inhibition before and after the surgical treatment of prolactinomas. A 64-electrode electroencephalogram (EEG) skullcap was used to record the brain activity in 20 pre-operative patients, 20 follow-up post-operative patients, and 20 healthy controls (HCs) while performing the visual Go/Nogo task. As expected, we identified P300 across all study populations that could reflect response activation and inhibition. Across the three groups, the Nogo stimuli evoked larger frontal-central P300 than the Go stimuli did. In contrast, the Go trials elicited larger parietal P300 than the Nogo trials did. The peak latency of P300 was significantly delayed in both the pre-operative and the post-operative groups compared to the HCs. The amplitude of P300 in both the Go and the Nogo conditions was significantly decreased in the pre-operative patients compared with that of the HCs. At 6 months post-operatively, the prolactinoma patients showed an increase in amplitude of P300 during both the Go and the Nogo tasks. These findings indicate that the prolactinoma patients suffer from deficits in response activation and inhibition, which could be improved by surgical treatment. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7396600/ /pubmed/32848659 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00170 Text en Copyright © 2020 Song, Cao, Wang, Yao, Catalino, Yan, Xu and Ma. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Human Neuroscience
Song, Jian
Cao, Chenglong
Wang, Yu
Yao, Shun
Catalino, Michael P.
Yan, Deqi
Xu, Guozheng
Ma, Lianting
Response Activation and Inhibition in Patients With Prolactinomas: An Electrophysiological Study
title Response Activation and Inhibition in Patients With Prolactinomas: An Electrophysiological Study
title_full Response Activation and Inhibition in Patients With Prolactinomas: An Electrophysiological Study
title_fullStr Response Activation and Inhibition in Patients With Prolactinomas: An Electrophysiological Study
title_full_unstemmed Response Activation and Inhibition in Patients With Prolactinomas: An Electrophysiological Study
title_short Response Activation and Inhibition in Patients With Prolactinomas: An Electrophysiological Study
title_sort response activation and inhibition in patients with prolactinomas: an electrophysiological study
topic Human Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7396600/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32848659
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00170
work_keys_str_mv AT songjian responseactivationandinhibitioninpatientswithprolactinomasanelectrophysiologicalstudy
AT caochenglong responseactivationandinhibitioninpatientswithprolactinomasanelectrophysiologicalstudy
AT wangyu responseactivationandinhibitioninpatientswithprolactinomasanelectrophysiologicalstudy
AT yaoshun responseactivationandinhibitioninpatientswithprolactinomasanelectrophysiologicalstudy
AT catalinomichaelp responseactivationandinhibitioninpatientswithprolactinomasanelectrophysiologicalstudy
AT yandeqi responseactivationandinhibitioninpatientswithprolactinomasanelectrophysiologicalstudy
AT xuguozheng responseactivationandinhibitioninpatientswithprolactinomasanelectrophysiologicalstudy
AT malianting responseactivationandinhibitioninpatientswithprolactinomasanelectrophysiologicalstudy