Cargando…
Anastomotic techniques for oesophagectomy for malignancy: systematic review and network meta‐analysis
BACKGROUND: Current evidence on the benefits of different anastomotic techniques (hand‐sewn (HS), circular stapled (CS), triangulating stapled (TS) or linear stapled/semimechanical (LSSM) techniques) after oesophagectomy is conflicting. The aim of this study was to evaluate the evidence for the tech...
Autores principales: | Kamarajah, S. K., Bundred, J. R., Singh, P., Pasquali, S., Griffiths, E. A. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7397345/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32445431 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.50298 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Minimally invasive techniques for transthoracic oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer: systematic review and network meta‐analysis
por: Siaw‐Acheampong, K., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Vascular calcification does not predict anastomotic leak or conduit necrosis following oesophagectomy
por: Jefferies, Benjamin J, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Preoperative risk modelling for oesophagectomy: A systematic review
por: Grantham, James Paul, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Meta‐analysis of the impact of postoperative complications on survival after oesophagectomy for cancer
por: Booka, E., et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Combined and intraoperative risk modelling for oesophagectomy: A systematic review
por: Grantham, James Paul, et al.
Publicado: (2023)