Cargando…
Liquid biopsy for cancer diagnosis using vibrational spectroscopy: systematic review
BACKGROUND: Vibrational spectroscopy (VS) is a minimally invasive tool for analysing biological material to detect disease. This study aimed to review its application to human blood for cancer diagnosis. METHODS: A systematic review was undertaken using a keyword electronic database search (MEDLINE,...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7397350/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32424976 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.50289 |
_version_ | 1783565760770080768 |
---|---|
author | Anderson, D. J. Anderson, R. G. Moug, S. J. Baker, M. J. |
author_facet | Anderson, D. J. Anderson, R. G. Moug, S. J. Baker, M. J. |
author_sort | Anderson, D. J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Vibrational spectroscopy (VS) is a minimally invasive tool for analysing biological material to detect disease. This study aimed to review its application to human blood for cancer diagnosis. METHODS: A systematic review was undertaken using a keyword electronic database search (MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, TRIP and Cochrane Library), with all original English‐language manuscripts examining the use of vibrational spectral analysis of human blood for cancer detection. Studies involving fewer than 75 patients in the cancer or control group, animal studies, or where the primary analyte was not blood were excluded. RESULTS: From 1446 results, six studies (published in 2010–2018) examining brain, bladder, oral, breast, oesophageal and hepatic cancer met the criteria for inclusion, with a total population of 2392 (1316 cancer, 1076 control; 1476 men, 916 women). For cancer detection, reported mean sensitivities in each included study ranged from 79·3 to 98 per cent, with specificities of 82·8–95 per cent and accuracies between 81·1 and 97·1 per cent. Heterogeneity in reporting strategies, methods and outcome measures made meta‐analysis inappropriate. CONCLUSION: VS shows high potential for cancer diagnosis, but until there is agreement on uniform standard reporting methods and studies with adequate sample size for valid classification models have been performed, its value in clinical practice will remain uncertain. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7397350 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73973502020-08-06 Liquid biopsy for cancer diagnosis using vibrational spectroscopy: systematic review Anderson, D. J. Anderson, R. G. Moug, S. J. Baker, M. J. BJS Open Systematic Reviews BACKGROUND: Vibrational spectroscopy (VS) is a minimally invasive tool for analysing biological material to detect disease. This study aimed to review its application to human blood for cancer diagnosis. METHODS: A systematic review was undertaken using a keyword electronic database search (MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, TRIP and Cochrane Library), with all original English‐language manuscripts examining the use of vibrational spectral analysis of human blood for cancer detection. Studies involving fewer than 75 patients in the cancer or control group, animal studies, or where the primary analyte was not blood were excluded. RESULTS: From 1446 results, six studies (published in 2010–2018) examining brain, bladder, oral, breast, oesophageal and hepatic cancer met the criteria for inclusion, with a total population of 2392 (1316 cancer, 1076 control; 1476 men, 916 women). For cancer detection, reported mean sensitivities in each included study ranged from 79·3 to 98 per cent, with specificities of 82·8–95 per cent and accuracies between 81·1 and 97·1 per cent. Heterogeneity in reporting strategies, methods and outcome measures made meta‐analysis inappropriate. CONCLUSION: VS shows high potential for cancer diagnosis, but until there is agreement on uniform standard reporting methods and studies with adequate sample size for valid classification models have been performed, its value in clinical practice will remain uncertain. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2020-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7397350/ /pubmed/32424976 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.50289 Text en © 2020 The Authors. BJS Open published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Journal of Surgery Society This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Reviews Anderson, D. J. Anderson, R. G. Moug, S. J. Baker, M. J. Liquid biopsy for cancer diagnosis using vibrational spectroscopy: systematic review |
title | Liquid biopsy for cancer diagnosis using vibrational spectroscopy: systematic review |
title_full | Liquid biopsy for cancer diagnosis using vibrational spectroscopy: systematic review |
title_fullStr | Liquid biopsy for cancer diagnosis using vibrational spectroscopy: systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Liquid biopsy for cancer diagnosis using vibrational spectroscopy: systematic review |
title_short | Liquid biopsy for cancer diagnosis using vibrational spectroscopy: systematic review |
title_sort | liquid biopsy for cancer diagnosis using vibrational spectroscopy: systematic review |
topic | Systematic Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7397350/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32424976 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.50289 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT andersondj liquidbiopsyforcancerdiagnosisusingvibrationalspectroscopysystematicreview AT andersonrg liquidbiopsyforcancerdiagnosisusingvibrationalspectroscopysystematicreview AT mougsj liquidbiopsyforcancerdiagnosisusingvibrationalspectroscopysystematicreview AT bakermj liquidbiopsyforcancerdiagnosisusingvibrationalspectroscopysystematicreview |