Cargando…

Inequity under equality: research on the benefits equity of Chinese basic medical insurance

BACKGROUND: The pursuit of equity is one of the basic principles behind the strengthening of health care reform. China’s new rural cooperative medical insurance (NRCMI) and urban residents’ basic medical insurance (URBMI) are both “equalized” in terms of fundraising and reimbursement. This paper stu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Diao, Li, Liu, Yiwei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7397627/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32746813
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05584-w
_version_ 1783565806883307520
author Diao, Li
Liu, Yiwei
author_facet Diao, Li
Liu, Yiwei
author_sort Diao, Li
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The pursuit of equity is one of the basic principles behind the strengthening of health care reform. China’s new rural cooperative medical insurance (NRCMI) and urban residents’ basic medical insurance (URBMI) are both “equalized” in terms of fundraising and reimbursement. This paper studies the benefits equity under this “equalized” system. METHODS: The data analysed in this paper are from the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) from 2014 to 2016, implemented by the Institute of Social Science Survey at Peking University. A two-part model and a binary choice model are used in the empirical test. RESULTS: The empirical test revealed that high-income people benefit more from basic medical insurance than low-income people. Mechanism analysis demonstrated that high-income people have higher medical insurance applicability and can utilize better health care. Since low-income people are unhealthier, inequity in benefits exacerbates health inequity. We also found that the benefits equity of URBMI is better than that of NRCMI. CONCLUSIONS: The government needs to pay more attention to the issue of medical insurance inequity. We should consider allowing different income groups to pay different premiums according to their medical expenses or applying different reimbursement policies for different income groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7397627
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73976272020-08-06 Inequity under equality: research on the benefits equity of Chinese basic medical insurance Diao, Li Liu, Yiwei BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The pursuit of equity is one of the basic principles behind the strengthening of health care reform. China’s new rural cooperative medical insurance (NRCMI) and urban residents’ basic medical insurance (URBMI) are both “equalized” in terms of fundraising and reimbursement. This paper studies the benefits equity under this “equalized” system. METHODS: The data analysed in this paper are from the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) from 2014 to 2016, implemented by the Institute of Social Science Survey at Peking University. A two-part model and a binary choice model are used in the empirical test. RESULTS: The empirical test revealed that high-income people benefit more from basic medical insurance than low-income people. Mechanism analysis demonstrated that high-income people have higher medical insurance applicability and can utilize better health care. Since low-income people are unhealthier, inequity in benefits exacerbates health inequity. We also found that the benefits equity of URBMI is better than that of NRCMI. CONCLUSIONS: The government needs to pay more attention to the issue of medical insurance inequity. We should consider allowing different income groups to pay different premiums according to their medical expenses or applying different reimbursement policies for different income groups. BioMed Central 2020-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7397627/ /pubmed/32746813 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05584-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Diao, Li
Liu, Yiwei
Inequity under equality: research on the benefits equity of Chinese basic medical insurance
title Inequity under equality: research on the benefits equity of Chinese basic medical insurance
title_full Inequity under equality: research on the benefits equity of Chinese basic medical insurance
title_fullStr Inequity under equality: research on the benefits equity of Chinese basic medical insurance
title_full_unstemmed Inequity under equality: research on the benefits equity of Chinese basic medical insurance
title_short Inequity under equality: research on the benefits equity of Chinese basic medical insurance
title_sort inequity under equality: research on the benefits equity of chinese basic medical insurance
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7397627/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32746813
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05584-w
work_keys_str_mv AT diaoli inequityunderequalityresearchonthebenefitsequityofchinesebasicmedicalinsurance
AT liuyiwei inequityunderequalityresearchonthebenefitsequityofchinesebasicmedicalinsurance