Cargando…

Diagnostic accuracy of evaluation of suspected syncope in the emergency department: usual practice vs. ESC guidelines

BACKGROUND: Syncope is a frequent reason for referral to the emergency department. After excluding a potentially life-threatening condition, the second objective is to find the cause of syncope. The objective of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the treating physician in usual prac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Wijnen, Veera K., Gans, Reinold O. B., Wieling, Wouter, ter Maaten, Jan C., Harms, Mark P. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7397639/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32746777
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-020-00344-9
_version_ 1783565809485873152
author van Wijnen, Veera K.
Gans, Reinold O. B.
Wieling, Wouter
ter Maaten, Jan C.
Harms, Mark P. M.
author_facet van Wijnen, Veera K.
Gans, Reinold O. B.
Wieling, Wouter
ter Maaten, Jan C.
Harms, Mark P. M.
author_sort van Wijnen, Veera K.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Syncope is a frequent reason for referral to the emergency department. After excluding a potentially life-threatening condition, the second objective is to find the cause of syncope. The objective of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the treating physician in usual practice and to compare this to the diagnostic accuracy of a standardised evaluation, consisting of thorough history taking and physical examination by a research physician. METHODS: This prospective cohort study included suspected (pre) syncope patients without an identified serious underlying condition who were assessed in the emergency department. Patients were initially seen by the initial treating physician and the usual evaluation was performed. A research physician, blinded to the findings of the initial treating physician, then performed a standardised evaluation according to the ESC syncope guidelines. Diagnostic accuracy (proportion of correct diagnoses) was determined by expert consensus after long-term follow-up. RESULTS: One hundred and one suspected (pre) syncope patients were included (mean age 59 ± 20 years). The usual practice of the initial treating physicians did not in most cases follow ESC syncope guidelines, with orthostatic blood pressure measurements made in only 40% of the patients. Diagnostic accuracy by the initial treating physicians was 65% (95% CI 56–74%), while standardised evaluation resulted in a diagnostic accuracy of 80% (95% CI 71–87%; p = 0.009). No life-threatening causes were missed. CONCLUSIONS: Usual practice of the initial treating physician resulted in a diagnostic accuracy of 65%, while standardised practice, with an emphasis on thorough history taking, increased diagnostic accuracy to 80%. Results suggest that the availability of additional resources does not result in a higher diagnostic accuracy than standardised evaluation, and that history taking is the most important diagnostic test in suspected syncope patients. Netherlands Trial Registration: NTR5651. Registered 29 January 2016,https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/5532
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7397639
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73976392020-08-06 Diagnostic accuracy of evaluation of suspected syncope in the emergency department: usual practice vs. ESC guidelines van Wijnen, Veera K. Gans, Reinold O. B. Wieling, Wouter ter Maaten, Jan C. Harms, Mark P. M. BMC Emerg Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Syncope is a frequent reason for referral to the emergency department. After excluding a potentially life-threatening condition, the second objective is to find the cause of syncope. The objective of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the treating physician in usual practice and to compare this to the diagnostic accuracy of a standardised evaluation, consisting of thorough history taking and physical examination by a research physician. METHODS: This prospective cohort study included suspected (pre) syncope patients without an identified serious underlying condition who were assessed in the emergency department. Patients were initially seen by the initial treating physician and the usual evaluation was performed. A research physician, blinded to the findings of the initial treating physician, then performed a standardised evaluation according to the ESC syncope guidelines. Diagnostic accuracy (proportion of correct diagnoses) was determined by expert consensus after long-term follow-up. RESULTS: One hundred and one suspected (pre) syncope patients were included (mean age 59 ± 20 years). The usual practice of the initial treating physicians did not in most cases follow ESC syncope guidelines, with orthostatic blood pressure measurements made in only 40% of the patients. Diagnostic accuracy by the initial treating physicians was 65% (95% CI 56–74%), while standardised evaluation resulted in a diagnostic accuracy of 80% (95% CI 71–87%; p = 0.009). No life-threatening causes were missed. CONCLUSIONS: Usual practice of the initial treating physician resulted in a diagnostic accuracy of 65%, while standardised practice, with an emphasis on thorough history taking, increased diagnostic accuracy to 80%. Results suggest that the availability of additional resources does not result in a higher diagnostic accuracy than standardised evaluation, and that history taking is the most important diagnostic test in suspected syncope patients. Netherlands Trial Registration: NTR5651. Registered 29 January 2016,https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/5532 BioMed Central 2020-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7397639/ /pubmed/32746777 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-020-00344-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
van Wijnen, Veera K.
Gans, Reinold O. B.
Wieling, Wouter
ter Maaten, Jan C.
Harms, Mark P. M.
Diagnostic accuracy of evaluation of suspected syncope in the emergency department: usual practice vs. ESC guidelines
title Diagnostic accuracy of evaluation of suspected syncope in the emergency department: usual practice vs. ESC guidelines
title_full Diagnostic accuracy of evaluation of suspected syncope in the emergency department: usual practice vs. ESC guidelines
title_fullStr Diagnostic accuracy of evaluation of suspected syncope in the emergency department: usual practice vs. ESC guidelines
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic accuracy of evaluation of suspected syncope in the emergency department: usual practice vs. ESC guidelines
title_short Diagnostic accuracy of evaluation of suspected syncope in the emergency department: usual practice vs. ESC guidelines
title_sort diagnostic accuracy of evaluation of suspected syncope in the emergency department: usual practice vs. esc guidelines
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7397639/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32746777
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-020-00344-9
work_keys_str_mv AT vanwijnenveerak diagnosticaccuracyofevaluationofsuspectedsyncopeintheemergencydepartmentusualpracticevsescguidelines
AT gansreinoldob diagnosticaccuracyofevaluationofsuspectedsyncopeintheemergencydepartmentusualpracticevsescguidelines
AT wielingwouter diagnosticaccuracyofevaluationofsuspectedsyncopeintheemergencydepartmentusualpracticevsescguidelines
AT termaatenjanc diagnosticaccuracyofevaluationofsuspectedsyncopeintheemergencydepartmentusualpracticevsescguidelines
AT harmsmarkpm diagnosticaccuracyofevaluationofsuspectedsyncopeintheemergencydepartmentusualpracticevsescguidelines