Cargando…

Measuring quality of life in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a systematic review of the content and structural validity of commonly used instruments

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is an inherited X-linked neuromuscular disorder. A number of questionnaires are available to assess quality of life in DMD, but there are concerns about their validity. This systematic review aimed to appraise critically the content and structural validity of qualit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Powell, Philip A., Carlton, Jill, Woods, Helen Buckley, Mazzone, Paolo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7397669/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32746836
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01511-z
_version_ 1783565816435834880
author Powell, Philip A.
Carlton, Jill
Woods, Helen Buckley
Mazzone, Paolo
author_facet Powell, Philip A.
Carlton, Jill
Woods, Helen Buckley
Mazzone, Paolo
author_sort Powell, Philip A.
collection PubMed
description Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is an inherited X-linked neuromuscular disorder. A number of questionnaires are available to assess quality of life in DMD, but there are concerns about their validity. This systematic review aimed to appraise critically the content and structural validity of quality of life instruments for DMD. Five databases (EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Library) were searched, with supplementary searches in Google Scholar. We included articles with evidence on the content and/or structural validity of quality of life instruments in DMD, and/or instrument development. Evidence was evaluated against the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) criteria. Fifty five articles featured a questionnaire assessing quality of life in DMD. Forty instruments were extracted and 26 underwent assessment. Forty-one articles contained evidence on content or structural validity (including 37 development papers). Most instruments demonstrated low quality evidence and unsatisfactory or inconsistent validity in DMD, with the majority not featuring direct validation studies in this population. Only KIDSCREEN received an adequate rating for instrument design and a satisfactory result for content validity based on its development, yet, like the majority of PROMs, the measure has not been directly validated for use in DMD. Further research is needed on the validity of quality of life instruments in DMD, including content and structural validity studies in this population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7397669
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73976692020-08-06 Measuring quality of life in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a systematic review of the content and structural validity of commonly used instruments Powell, Philip A. Carlton, Jill Woods, Helen Buckley Mazzone, Paolo Health Qual Life Outcomes Review Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is an inherited X-linked neuromuscular disorder. A number of questionnaires are available to assess quality of life in DMD, but there are concerns about their validity. This systematic review aimed to appraise critically the content and structural validity of quality of life instruments for DMD. Five databases (EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Library) were searched, with supplementary searches in Google Scholar. We included articles with evidence on the content and/or structural validity of quality of life instruments in DMD, and/or instrument development. Evidence was evaluated against the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) criteria. Fifty five articles featured a questionnaire assessing quality of life in DMD. Forty instruments were extracted and 26 underwent assessment. Forty-one articles contained evidence on content or structural validity (including 37 development papers). Most instruments demonstrated low quality evidence and unsatisfactory or inconsistent validity in DMD, with the majority not featuring direct validation studies in this population. Only KIDSCREEN received an adequate rating for instrument design and a satisfactory result for content validity based on its development, yet, like the majority of PROMs, the measure has not been directly validated for use in DMD. Further research is needed on the validity of quality of life instruments in DMD, including content and structural validity studies in this population. BioMed Central 2020-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7397669/ /pubmed/32746836 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01511-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Powell, Philip A.
Carlton, Jill
Woods, Helen Buckley
Mazzone, Paolo
Measuring quality of life in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a systematic review of the content and structural validity of commonly used instruments
title Measuring quality of life in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a systematic review of the content and structural validity of commonly used instruments
title_full Measuring quality of life in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a systematic review of the content and structural validity of commonly used instruments
title_fullStr Measuring quality of life in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a systematic review of the content and structural validity of commonly used instruments
title_full_unstemmed Measuring quality of life in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a systematic review of the content and structural validity of commonly used instruments
title_short Measuring quality of life in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a systematic review of the content and structural validity of commonly used instruments
title_sort measuring quality of life in duchenne muscular dystrophy: a systematic review of the content and structural validity of commonly used instruments
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7397669/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32746836
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01511-z
work_keys_str_mv AT powellphilipa measuringqualityoflifeinduchennemusculardystrophyasystematicreviewofthecontentandstructuralvalidityofcommonlyusedinstruments
AT carltonjill measuringqualityoflifeinduchennemusculardystrophyasystematicreviewofthecontentandstructuralvalidityofcommonlyusedinstruments
AT woodshelenbuckley measuringqualityoflifeinduchennemusculardystrophyasystematicreviewofthecontentandstructuralvalidityofcommonlyusedinstruments
AT mazzonepaolo measuringqualityoflifeinduchennemusculardystrophyasystematicreviewofthecontentandstructuralvalidityofcommonlyusedinstruments