Cargando…
Measuring quality of life in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a systematic review of the content and structural validity of commonly used instruments
Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is an inherited X-linked neuromuscular disorder. A number of questionnaires are available to assess quality of life in DMD, but there are concerns about their validity. This systematic review aimed to appraise critically the content and structural validity of qualit...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7397669/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32746836 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01511-z |
_version_ | 1783565816435834880 |
---|---|
author | Powell, Philip A. Carlton, Jill Woods, Helen Buckley Mazzone, Paolo |
author_facet | Powell, Philip A. Carlton, Jill Woods, Helen Buckley Mazzone, Paolo |
author_sort | Powell, Philip A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is an inherited X-linked neuromuscular disorder. A number of questionnaires are available to assess quality of life in DMD, but there are concerns about their validity. This systematic review aimed to appraise critically the content and structural validity of quality of life instruments for DMD. Five databases (EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Library) were searched, with supplementary searches in Google Scholar. We included articles with evidence on the content and/or structural validity of quality of life instruments in DMD, and/or instrument development. Evidence was evaluated against the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) criteria. Fifty five articles featured a questionnaire assessing quality of life in DMD. Forty instruments were extracted and 26 underwent assessment. Forty-one articles contained evidence on content or structural validity (including 37 development papers). Most instruments demonstrated low quality evidence and unsatisfactory or inconsistent validity in DMD, with the majority not featuring direct validation studies in this population. Only KIDSCREEN received an adequate rating for instrument design and a satisfactory result for content validity based on its development, yet, like the majority of PROMs, the measure has not been directly validated for use in DMD. Further research is needed on the validity of quality of life instruments in DMD, including content and structural validity studies in this population. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7397669 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73976692020-08-06 Measuring quality of life in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a systematic review of the content and structural validity of commonly used instruments Powell, Philip A. Carlton, Jill Woods, Helen Buckley Mazzone, Paolo Health Qual Life Outcomes Review Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is an inherited X-linked neuromuscular disorder. A number of questionnaires are available to assess quality of life in DMD, but there are concerns about their validity. This systematic review aimed to appraise critically the content and structural validity of quality of life instruments for DMD. Five databases (EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Library) were searched, with supplementary searches in Google Scholar. We included articles with evidence on the content and/or structural validity of quality of life instruments in DMD, and/or instrument development. Evidence was evaluated against the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) criteria. Fifty five articles featured a questionnaire assessing quality of life in DMD. Forty instruments were extracted and 26 underwent assessment. Forty-one articles contained evidence on content or structural validity (including 37 development papers). Most instruments demonstrated low quality evidence and unsatisfactory or inconsistent validity in DMD, with the majority not featuring direct validation studies in this population. Only KIDSCREEN received an adequate rating for instrument design and a satisfactory result for content validity based on its development, yet, like the majority of PROMs, the measure has not been directly validated for use in DMD. Further research is needed on the validity of quality of life instruments in DMD, including content and structural validity studies in this population. BioMed Central 2020-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7397669/ /pubmed/32746836 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01511-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Review Powell, Philip A. Carlton, Jill Woods, Helen Buckley Mazzone, Paolo Measuring quality of life in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a systematic review of the content and structural validity of commonly used instruments |
title | Measuring quality of life in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a systematic review of the content and structural validity of commonly used instruments |
title_full | Measuring quality of life in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a systematic review of the content and structural validity of commonly used instruments |
title_fullStr | Measuring quality of life in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a systematic review of the content and structural validity of commonly used instruments |
title_full_unstemmed | Measuring quality of life in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a systematic review of the content and structural validity of commonly used instruments |
title_short | Measuring quality of life in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a systematic review of the content and structural validity of commonly used instruments |
title_sort | measuring quality of life in duchenne muscular dystrophy: a systematic review of the content and structural validity of commonly used instruments |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7397669/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32746836 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01511-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT powellphilipa measuringqualityoflifeinduchennemusculardystrophyasystematicreviewofthecontentandstructuralvalidityofcommonlyusedinstruments AT carltonjill measuringqualityoflifeinduchennemusculardystrophyasystematicreviewofthecontentandstructuralvalidityofcommonlyusedinstruments AT woodshelenbuckley measuringqualityoflifeinduchennemusculardystrophyasystematicreviewofthecontentandstructuralvalidityofcommonlyusedinstruments AT mazzonepaolo measuringqualityoflifeinduchennemusculardystrophyasystematicreviewofthecontentandstructuralvalidityofcommonlyusedinstruments |