Cargando…

How to predict early clinical outcomes and evaluate the quality of primary total knee arthroplasty: a new scoring system based on lower-extremity angles of alignment

BACKGROUND: A method that can accurately predict the outcome of surgery can give patients timely feedback. In addition, to some extent, an objective evaluation method can help the surgeon quickly summarize the patient’s surgical experience and lessen dependence on the long wait for follow-up results...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Ziming, Deng, Zhantao, Li, Qingtian, Chen, Junfeng, Ma, Yuanchen, Zheng, Qiujian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7397679/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32746812
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03528-3
_version_ 1783565818551861248
author Chen, Ziming
Deng, Zhantao
Li, Qingtian
Chen, Junfeng
Ma, Yuanchen
Zheng, Qiujian
author_facet Chen, Ziming
Deng, Zhantao
Li, Qingtian
Chen, Junfeng
Ma, Yuanchen
Zheng, Qiujian
author_sort Chen, Ziming
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A method that can accurately predict the outcome of surgery can give patients timely feedback. In addition, to some extent, an objective evaluation method can help the surgeon quickly summarize the patient’s surgical experience and lessen dependence on the long wait for follow-up results. However, there was still no precise tool to predict clinical outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study aimed to develop a scoring system to predict clinical results of TKA and then grade the quality of TKA. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 98 primary TKAs performed between April 2013 and March 2017 to determine predictors of clinical outcomes among lower-extremity angles of alignment. Applying multivariable linear-regression analysis, we built Models (i) and (ii) to predict detailed clinical outcomes which were evaluated using the Knee Society Score (KSS). Multivariable logistic-regression analysis was used to establish Model (iii) to predict probability of getting a good clinical outcome (PGGCO) which was evaluated by Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) score. Finally, we designed a new scoring system consisting of 3 prediction models and presented a method of grading TKA quality. Thirty primary TKAs between April and December 2017 were enrolled for external validation. RESULTS: We set up a scoring system consisting of 3 models. The interpretations of Model (i) and (ii) were good (R(2) = 0.756 and 0.764, respectively). Model (iii) displayed good discrimination, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.936, and good calibration according to the calibration curve. Quality of surgery was stratified as follows: “A” = PGGCO ≥0.8, “B” = PGGCO ≤0.6 but < 0.8, and “C” = PGGCO < 0.6. The scoring system performed well in external validation. CONCLUSIONS: This study first developed a validated, evidence-based scoring system based on lower-extremity angles of alignment to predict early clinical outcomes and to objectively evaluate the quality of TKA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7397679
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73976792020-08-06 How to predict early clinical outcomes and evaluate the quality of primary total knee arthroplasty: a new scoring system based on lower-extremity angles of alignment Chen, Ziming Deng, Zhantao Li, Qingtian Chen, Junfeng Ma, Yuanchen Zheng, Qiujian BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: A method that can accurately predict the outcome of surgery can give patients timely feedback. In addition, to some extent, an objective evaluation method can help the surgeon quickly summarize the patient’s surgical experience and lessen dependence on the long wait for follow-up results. However, there was still no precise tool to predict clinical outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study aimed to develop a scoring system to predict clinical results of TKA and then grade the quality of TKA. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 98 primary TKAs performed between April 2013 and March 2017 to determine predictors of clinical outcomes among lower-extremity angles of alignment. Applying multivariable linear-regression analysis, we built Models (i) and (ii) to predict detailed clinical outcomes which were evaluated using the Knee Society Score (KSS). Multivariable logistic-regression analysis was used to establish Model (iii) to predict probability of getting a good clinical outcome (PGGCO) which was evaluated by Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) score. Finally, we designed a new scoring system consisting of 3 prediction models and presented a method of grading TKA quality. Thirty primary TKAs between April and December 2017 were enrolled for external validation. RESULTS: We set up a scoring system consisting of 3 models. The interpretations of Model (i) and (ii) were good (R(2) = 0.756 and 0.764, respectively). Model (iii) displayed good discrimination, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.936, and good calibration according to the calibration curve. Quality of surgery was stratified as follows: “A” = PGGCO ≥0.8, “B” = PGGCO ≤0.6 but < 0.8, and “C” = PGGCO < 0.6. The scoring system performed well in external validation. CONCLUSIONS: This study first developed a validated, evidence-based scoring system based on lower-extremity angles of alignment to predict early clinical outcomes and to objectively evaluate the quality of TKA. BioMed Central 2020-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7397679/ /pubmed/32746812 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03528-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chen, Ziming
Deng, Zhantao
Li, Qingtian
Chen, Junfeng
Ma, Yuanchen
Zheng, Qiujian
How to predict early clinical outcomes and evaluate the quality of primary total knee arthroplasty: a new scoring system based on lower-extremity angles of alignment
title How to predict early clinical outcomes and evaluate the quality of primary total knee arthroplasty: a new scoring system based on lower-extremity angles of alignment
title_full How to predict early clinical outcomes and evaluate the quality of primary total knee arthroplasty: a new scoring system based on lower-extremity angles of alignment
title_fullStr How to predict early clinical outcomes and evaluate the quality of primary total knee arthroplasty: a new scoring system based on lower-extremity angles of alignment
title_full_unstemmed How to predict early clinical outcomes and evaluate the quality of primary total knee arthroplasty: a new scoring system based on lower-extremity angles of alignment
title_short How to predict early clinical outcomes and evaluate the quality of primary total knee arthroplasty: a new scoring system based on lower-extremity angles of alignment
title_sort how to predict early clinical outcomes and evaluate the quality of primary total knee arthroplasty: a new scoring system based on lower-extremity angles of alignment
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7397679/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32746812
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03528-3
work_keys_str_mv AT chenziming howtopredictearlyclinicaloutcomesandevaluatethequalityofprimarytotalkneearthroplastyanewscoringsystembasedonlowerextremityanglesofalignment
AT dengzhantao howtopredictearlyclinicaloutcomesandevaluatethequalityofprimarytotalkneearthroplastyanewscoringsystembasedonlowerextremityanglesofalignment
AT liqingtian howtopredictearlyclinicaloutcomesandevaluatethequalityofprimarytotalkneearthroplastyanewscoringsystembasedonlowerextremityanglesofalignment
AT chenjunfeng howtopredictearlyclinicaloutcomesandevaluatethequalityofprimarytotalkneearthroplastyanewscoringsystembasedonlowerextremityanglesofalignment
AT mayuanchen howtopredictearlyclinicaloutcomesandevaluatethequalityofprimarytotalkneearthroplastyanewscoringsystembasedonlowerextremityanglesofalignment
AT zhengqiujian howtopredictearlyclinicaloutcomesandevaluatethequalityofprimarytotalkneearthroplastyanewscoringsystembasedonlowerextremityanglesofalignment