Cargando…

Salivary neoplasia in dogs and cats: 1996–2017

OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to report the contemporary demographical information, provide the incidence of and to assess sex and breed predisposition of salivary gland neoplasia in dogs and cats. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Information was collected from cats or dogs with salivary neopla...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cray, Megan, Selmic, Laura E., Ruple, Audrey
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7397883/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31849188
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/vms3.228
_version_ 1783565849384189952
author Cray, Megan
Selmic, Laura E.
Ruple, Audrey
author_facet Cray, Megan
Selmic, Laura E.
Ruple, Audrey
author_sort Cray, Megan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to report the contemporary demographical information, provide the incidence of and to assess sex and breed predisposition of salivary gland neoplasia in dogs and cats. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Information was collected from cats or dogs with salivary neoplasia (cases) and controls from the 26 university veterinary teaching hospitals within the Veterinary Medical Data Base. A total of 56 dogs and 24 cats were identified as having been diagnosed with salivary neoplasia. RESULTS: The incidence of salivary neoplasia in this population was calculated to be 15.3 per 100,000 dogs and 26.3 per 100,000 cats. The specific anatomic location of the salivary neoplasia was unable to be determined in 90.8% of cases in both dogs and cats. Results of the univariable conditional logistic regression models revealed no increased risk of salivary neoplasia in dogs or cats of any sex or neuter status (dogs: p = .26; cats: p = .45). There was no breed disposition within the feline species for salivary neoplasia. However, in the conditional logistic regression for dogs, poodles (toy and standard) trended towards significance (p = .075) with an odds ratio of 6.83 (95% CI: 1.16–40.10) compared to mixed breeds. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The present study's results differ from previous conclusions made in regards to predisposed breeds and tumour location. Additional epidemiological studies should be performed to help in determining risk factors for salivary gland neoplasia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7397883
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73978832020-08-06 Salivary neoplasia in dogs and cats: 1996–2017 Cray, Megan Selmic, Laura E. Ruple, Audrey Vet Med Sci Original Articles OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to report the contemporary demographical information, provide the incidence of and to assess sex and breed predisposition of salivary gland neoplasia in dogs and cats. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Information was collected from cats or dogs with salivary neoplasia (cases) and controls from the 26 university veterinary teaching hospitals within the Veterinary Medical Data Base. A total of 56 dogs and 24 cats were identified as having been diagnosed with salivary neoplasia. RESULTS: The incidence of salivary neoplasia in this population was calculated to be 15.3 per 100,000 dogs and 26.3 per 100,000 cats. The specific anatomic location of the salivary neoplasia was unable to be determined in 90.8% of cases in both dogs and cats. Results of the univariable conditional logistic regression models revealed no increased risk of salivary neoplasia in dogs or cats of any sex or neuter status (dogs: p = .26; cats: p = .45). There was no breed disposition within the feline species for salivary neoplasia. However, in the conditional logistic regression for dogs, poodles (toy and standard) trended towards significance (p = .075) with an odds ratio of 6.83 (95% CI: 1.16–40.10) compared to mixed breeds. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The present study's results differ from previous conclusions made in regards to predisposed breeds and tumour location. Additional epidemiological studies should be performed to help in determining risk factors for salivary gland neoplasia. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7397883/ /pubmed/31849188 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/vms3.228 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Veterinary Medicine and Science Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Cray, Megan
Selmic, Laura E.
Ruple, Audrey
Salivary neoplasia in dogs and cats: 1996–2017
title Salivary neoplasia in dogs and cats: 1996–2017
title_full Salivary neoplasia in dogs and cats: 1996–2017
title_fullStr Salivary neoplasia in dogs and cats: 1996–2017
title_full_unstemmed Salivary neoplasia in dogs and cats: 1996–2017
title_short Salivary neoplasia in dogs and cats: 1996–2017
title_sort salivary neoplasia in dogs and cats: 1996–2017
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7397883/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31849188
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/vms3.228
work_keys_str_mv AT craymegan salivaryneoplasiaindogsandcats19962017
AT selmiclaurae salivaryneoplasiaindogsandcats19962017
AT rupleaudrey salivaryneoplasiaindogsandcats19962017