Cargando…
Salivary neoplasia in dogs and cats: 1996–2017
OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to report the contemporary demographical information, provide the incidence of and to assess sex and breed predisposition of salivary gland neoplasia in dogs and cats. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Information was collected from cats or dogs with salivary neopla...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7397883/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31849188 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/vms3.228 |
_version_ | 1783565849384189952 |
---|---|
author | Cray, Megan Selmic, Laura E. Ruple, Audrey |
author_facet | Cray, Megan Selmic, Laura E. Ruple, Audrey |
author_sort | Cray, Megan |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to report the contemporary demographical information, provide the incidence of and to assess sex and breed predisposition of salivary gland neoplasia in dogs and cats. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Information was collected from cats or dogs with salivary neoplasia (cases) and controls from the 26 university veterinary teaching hospitals within the Veterinary Medical Data Base. A total of 56 dogs and 24 cats were identified as having been diagnosed with salivary neoplasia. RESULTS: The incidence of salivary neoplasia in this population was calculated to be 15.3 per 100,000 dogs and 26.3 per 100,000 cats. The specific anatomic location of the salivary neoplasia was unable to be determined in 90.8% of cases in both dogs and cats. Results of the univariable conditional logistic regression models revealed no increased risk of salivary neoplasia in dogs or cats of any sex or neuter status (dogs: p = .26; cats: p = .45). There was no breed disposition within the feline species for salivary neoplasia. However, in the conditional logistic regression for dogs, poodles (toy and standard) trended towards significance (p = .075) with an odds ratio of 6.83 (95% CI: 1.16–40.10) compared to mixed breeds. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The present study's results differ from previous conclusions made in regards to predisposed breeds and tumour location. Additional epidemiological studies should be performed to help in determining risk factors for salivary gland neoplasia. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7397883 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73978832020-08-06 Salivary neoplasia in dogs and cats: 1996–2017 Cray, Megan Selmic, Laura E. Ruple, Audrey Vet Med Sci Original Articles OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to report the contemporary demographical information, provide the incidence of and to assess sex and breed predisposition of salivary gland neoplasia in dogs and cats. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Information was collected from cats or dogs with salivary neoplasia (cases) and controls from the 26 university veterinary teaching hospitals within the Veterinary Medical Data Base. A total of 56 dogs and 24 cats were identified as having been diagnosed with salivary neoplasia. RESULTS: The incidence of salivary neoplasia in this population was calculated to be 15.3 per 100,000 dogs and 26.3 per 100,000 cats. The specific anatomic location of the salivary neoplasia was unable to be determined in 90.8% of cases in both dogs and cats. Results of the univariable conditional logistic regression models revealed no increased risk of salivary neoplasia in dogs or cats of any sex or neuter status (dogs: p = .26; cats: p = .45). There was no breed disposition within the feline species for salivary neoplasia. However, in the conditional logistic regression for dogs, poodles (toy and standard) trended towards significance (p = .075) with an odds ratio of 6.83 (95% CI: 1.16–40.10) compared to mixed breeds. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The present study's results differ from previous conclusions made in regards to predisposed breeds and tumour location. Additional epidemiological studies should be performed to help in determining risk factors for salivary gland neoplasia. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7397883/ /pubmed/31849188 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/vms3.228 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Veterinary Medicine and Science Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Cray, Megan Selmic, Laura E. Ruple, Audrey Salivary neoplasia in dogs and cats: 1996–2017 |
title | Salivary neoplasia in dogs and cats: 1996–2017 |
title_full | Salivary neoplasia in dogs and cats: 1996–2017 |
title_fullStr | Salivary neoplasia in dogs and cats: 1996–2017 |
title_full_unstemmed | Salivary neoplasia in dogs and cats: 1996–2017 |
title_short | Salivary neoplasia in dogs and cats: 1996–2017 |
title_sort | salivary neoplasia in dogs and cats: 1996–2017 |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7397883/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31849188 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/vms3.228 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT craymegan salivaryneoplasiaindogsandcats19962017 AT selmiclaurae salivaryneoplasiaindogsandcats19962017 AT rupleaudrey salivaryneoplasiaindogsandcats19962017 |