Cargando…

Future role for adoptive T-cell therapy in checkpoint inhibitor-resistant metastatic melanoma

Personalized cell therapy targeting tumor antigens with expanded tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) has shown great promise in metastatic melanoma (MM) since the 90s. However, MM was first-in line to benefit from the wave of checkpoint inhibitors (CPI), which shifted the focus of immunotherapy al...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Borch, Troels Holz, Andersen, Rikke, Ellebaek, Eva, Met, Özcan, Donia, Marco, Marie Svane, Inge
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7398110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32747469
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2020-000668
_version_ 1783565899350933504
author Borch, Troels Holz
Andersen, Rikke
Ellebaek, Eva
Met, Özcan
Donia, Marco
Marie Svane, Inge
author_facet Borch, Troels Holz
Andersen, Rikke
Ellebaek, Eva
Met, Özcan
Donia, Marco
Marie Svane, Inge
author_sort Borch, Troels Holz
collection PubMed
description Personalized cell therapy targeting tumor antigens with expanded tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) has shown great promise in metastatic melanoma (MM) since the 90s. However, MM was first-in line to benefit from the wave of checkpoint inhibitors (CPI), which shifted the focus of immunotherapy almost fully to immune CPI. Still, the majority of patients fail to benefit from CPI treatment, raising the intriguing question on how TIL therapy may fit into the changing landscape of melanoma treatment. We took advantage of data from a unique cohort of patients with MM treated with T-cell therapy in consecutive clinical trials at our institution across the last 10 years. Based on detailed data on patient characteristics, pre-TIL and post-TIL treatments and long-term follow-up, we were able to address the important issue of how TIL therapy can be positioned in the current CPI era. We found that previous progression on anticytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 do not seem to harm neither rate nor duration of response to TIL therapy. Importantly, even in the hard-to-treat population of patients who progressed on antiprogrammed cell death protein 1 (anti-PD-1), an objective response rate of 32% was achieved, including durable responses. Yet, median progression-free survival was reduced in this anti-PD-1 refractory population. Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT00937625, NCT02379195 and NCT02354690.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7398110
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73981102020-08-17 Future role for adoptive T-cell therapy in checkpoint inhibitor-resistant metastatic melanoma Borch, Troels Holz Andersen, Rikke Ellebaek, Eva Met, Özcan Donia, Marco Marie Svane, Inge J Immunother Cancer Immune Cell Therapies and Immune Cell Engineering Personalized cell therapy targeting tumor antigens with expanded tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) has shown great promise in metastatic melanoma (MM) since the 90s. However, MM was first-in line to benefit from the wave of checkpoint inhibitors (CPI), which shifted the focus of immunotherapy almost fully to immune CPI. Still, the majority of patients fail to benefit from CPI treatment, raising the intriguing question on how TIL therapy may fit into the changing landscape of melanoma treatment. We took advantage of data from a unique cohort of patients with MM treated with T-cell therapy in consecutive clinical trials at our institution across the last 10 years. Based on detailed data on patient characteristics, pre-TIL and post-TIL treatments and long-term follow-up, we were able to address the important issue of how TIL therapy can be positioned in the current CPI era. We found that previous progression on anticytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 do not seem to harm neither rate nor duration of response to TIL therapy. Importantly, even in the hard-to-treat population of patients who progressed on antiprogrammed cell death protein 1 (anti-PD-1), an objective response rate of 32% was achieved, including durable responses. Yet, median progression-free survival was reduced in this anti-PD-1 refractory population. Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT00937625, NCT02379195 and NCT02354690. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7398110/ /pubmed/32747469 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2020-000668 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Immune Cell Therapies and Immune Cell Engineering
Borch, Troels Holz
Andersen, Rikke
Ellebaek, Eva
Met, Özcan
Donia, Marco
Marie Svane, Inge
Future role for adoptive T-cell therapy in checkpoint inhibitor-resistant metastatic melanoma
title Future role for adoptive T-cell therapy in checkpoint inhibitor-resistant metastatic melanoma
title_full Future role for adoptive T-cell therapy in checkpoint inhibitor-resistant metastatic melanoma
title_fullStr Future role for adoptive T-cell therapy in checkpoint inhibitor-resistant metastatic melanoma
title_full_unstemmed Future role for adoptive T-cell therapy in checkpoint inhibitor-resistant metastatic melanoma
title_short Future role for adoptive T-cell therapy in checkpoint inhibitor-resistant metastatic melanoma
title_sort future role for adoptive t-cell therapy in checkpoint inhibitor-resistant metastatic melanoma
topic Immune Cell Therapies and Immune Cell Engineering
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7398110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32747469
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2020-000668
work_keys_str_mv AT borchtroelsholz futureroleforadoptivetcelltherapyincheckpointinhibitorresistantmetastaticmelanoma
AT andersenrikke futureroleforadoptivetcelltherapyincheckpointinhibitorresistantmetastaticmelanoma
AT ellebaekeva futureroleforadoptivetcelltherapyincheckpointinhibitorresistantmetastaticmelanoma
AT metozcan futureroleforadoptivetcelltherapyincheckpointinhibitorresistantmetastaticmelanoma
AT doniamarco futureroleforadoptivetcelltherapyincheckpointinhibitorresistantmetastaticmelanoma
AT mariesvaneinge futureroleforadoptivetcelltherapyincheckpointinhibitorresistantmetastaticmelanoma