Cargando…

A comparative study of sagittal dental relationship using digital method of bite mark evaluation

INTRODUCTION: Intercuspation of teeth depends on position of teeth and jaws. Bite mark is the resultant of the intercuspation of teeth produced by an individual. AIMS AND OBJECTIVE: Comparative evaluation of bite marks in Angle's Class I, II, and III sagittal occlusion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Raina, Pallavi, Kulkarni, Narayan, Shah, Romil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7398363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32801583
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfo.jfds_80_19
_version_ 1783565950313824256
author Raina, Pallavi
Kulkarni, Narayan
Shah, Romil
author_facet Raina, Pallavi
Kulkarni, Narayan
Shah, Romil
author_sort Raina, Pallavi
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Intercuspation of teeth depends on position of teeth and jaws. Bite mark is the resultant of the intercuspation of teeth produced by an individual. AIMS AND OBJECTIVE: Comparative evaluation of bite marks in Angle's Class I, II, and III sagittal occlusion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three groups as per Angle's classification-Class I, Class II, and Class III relation were taken. Each group comprised 30 samples each. The dental casts were scanned to create digital images. “IC Measure” software was used to determine the angular and linear measurements on scanned images of study model after calibration. Internal angles of odontometric triangle, intercanine width, shape of the arch, size, and shape of the individual teeth was recorded and subjected to the statistical analysis. RESULTS: All incisors had rectangular and canine had triangular shape. Bilateral maxillary lateral incisors and mandibular left central incisor were significantly small in size for Class III. Square arch form was found more commonly in Class III and ovoid arch form in Class I and Class II occlusion. Intercanine width was insignificant among all occlusions. All the angles of the odontometric triangle in the maxillary and mandibular arches were significant for Class III. CONCLUSION: Class III occlusion individuals were distinct for shape of the arch and angles of maxillary and mandibular odontometric triangle. The quantified values of odontometric triangle can be utilized for the identification of Class III individuals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7398363
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73983632020-08-13 A comparative study of sagittal dental relationship using digital method of bite mark evaluation Raina, Pallavi Kulkarni, Narayan Shah, Romil J Forensic Dent Sci Original Article INTRODUCTION: Intercuspation of teeth depends on position of teeth and jaws. Bite mark is the resultant of the intercuspation of teeth produced by an individual. AIMS AND OBJECTIVE: Comparative evaluation of bite marks in Angle's Class I, II, and III sagittal occlusion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three groups as per Angle's classification-Class I, Class II, and Class III relation were taken. Each group comprised 30 samples each. The dental casts were scanned to create digital images. “IC Measure” software was used to determine the angular and linear measurements on scanned images of study model after calibration. Internal angles of odontometric triangle, intercanine width, shape of the arch, size, and shape of the individual teeth was recorded and subjected to the statistical analysis. RESULTS: All incisors had rectangular and canine had triangular shape. Bilateral maxillary lateral incisors and mandibular left central incisor were significantly small in size for Class III. Square arch form was found more commonly in Class III and ovoid arch form in Class I and Class II occlusion. Intercanine width was insignificant among all occlusions. All the angles of the odontometric triangle in the maxillary and mandibular arches were significant for Class III. CONCLUSION: Class III occlusion individuals were distinct for shape of the arch and angles of maxillary and mandibular odontometric triangle. The quantified values of odontometric triangle can be utilized for the identification of Class III individuals. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019 2020-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7398363/ /pubmed/32801583 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfo.jfds_80_19 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Raina, Pallavi
Kulkarni, Narayan
Shah, Romil
A comparative study of sagittal dental relationship using digital method of bite mark evaluation
title A comparative study of sagittal dental relationship using digital method of bite mark evaluation
title_full A comparative study of sagittal dental relationship using digital method of bite mark evaluation
title_fullStr A comparative study of sagittal dental relationship using digital method of bite mark evaluation
title_full_unstemmed A comparative study of sagittal dental relationship using digital method of bite mark evaluation
title_short A comparative study of sagittal dental relationship using digital method of bite mark evaluation
title_sort comparative study of sagittal dental relationship using digital method of bite mark evaluation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7398363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32801583
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfo.jfds_80_19
work_keys_str_mv AT rainapallavi acomparativestudyofsagittaldentalrelationshipusingdigitalmethodofbitemarkevaluation
AT kulkarninarayan acomparativestudyofsagittaldentalrelationshipusingdigitalmethodofbitemarkevaluation
AT shahromil acomparativestudyofsagittaldentalrelationshipusingdigitalmethodofbitemarkevaluation
AT rainapallavi comparativestudyofsagittaldentalrelationshipusingdigitalmethodofbitemarkevaluation
AT kulkarninarayan comparativestudyofsagittaldentalrelationshipusingdigitalmethodofbitemarkevaluation
AT shahromil comparativestudyofsagittaldentalrelationshipusingdigitalmethodofbitemarkevaluation