Cargando…
Efficacy and safety of erenumab in women with a history of menstrual migraine
BACKGROUND: We performed a post hoc, subgroup analysis of a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of erenumab for prevention of episodic migraine (STRIVE) to determine the efficacy and safety of erenumab in women with self-reported menstrual migraine. METHODS: Patients received...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Milan
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7398400/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32746775 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-020-01167-6 |
_version_ | 1783565958622740480 |
---|---|
author | Pavlovic, Jelena M. Paemeleire, Koen Göbel, Hartmut Bonner, Jo Rapoport, Alan Kagan, Risa Zhang, Feng Picard, Hernan Mikol, Daniel D. |
author_facet | Pavlovic, Jelena M. Paemeleire, Koen Göbel, Hartmut Bonner, Jo Rapoport, Alan Kagan, Risa Zhang, Feng Picard, Hernan Mikol, Daniel D. |
author_sort | Pavlovic, Jelena M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: We performed a post hoc, subgroup analysis of a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of erenumab for prevention of episodic migraine (STRIVE) to determine the efficacy and safety of erenumab in women with self-reported menstrual migraine. METHODS: Patients received placebo, erenumab 70 mg, or erenumab 140 mg subcutaneously once monthly during the 6-month double-blind treatment phase of STRIVE. Women who reported history of menstrual migraine and who were ≤ 50 years old were included in the analysis. Endpoints were change from baseline in monthly migraine days (MMD) and monthly acute migraine-specific medication days (MSMD; among patients who took acute migraine-specific medications at baseline), proportion of patients achieving ≥ 50% reduction from baseline in MMD, and incidence of adverse events. RESULTS: Among 814 women enrolled in STRIVE, 232 (28.5%) reported a history of menstrual migraine and were ≤ 50 years old. Of the 232 patients, 214 (92%) had a baseline MMD > 5, suggesting a high proportion of women with attacks outside of the 5-day perimenstrual window (2 days before and 3 days after the start of menstruation). Information on “migraine days” includes (and does not discriminate between) perimenstrual and intermenstrual migraine attacks. Between-group differences from placebo over months 4–6 for erenumab 70 mg and 140 mg were − 1.8 (P = 0.001) and − 2.1 (P < 0.001) days for MMD and − 1.6 (P = 0.002) and − 2.4 (P < 0.001) days for acute MSMD, respectively. The odds of having a ≥ 50% reduction from baseline in MMD over months 4–6 were 2.2 (P = 0.024) and 2.8 (P = 0.002) times greater for erenumab 70 mg and 140 mg, respectively, than for placebo. Erenumab had an overall safety profile comparable to placebo. CONCLUSION: Data from this subgroup analysis of women with menstrual migraine are consistent with data from the overall STRIVE episodic migraine population, supporting the efficacy and safety of erenumab in women who experience menstrual migraine. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02456740. Registered 28 May 2015. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7398400 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Milan |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73984002020-08-06 Efficacy and safety of erenumab in women with a history of menstrual migraine Pavlovic, Jelena M. Paemeleire, Koen Göbel, Hartmut Bonner, Jo Rapoport, Alan Kagan, Risa Zhang, Feng Picard, Hernan Mikol, Daniel D. J Headache Pain Research Article BACKGROUND: We performed a post hoc, subgroup analysis of a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of erenumab for prevention of episodic migraine (STRIVE) to determine the efficacy and safety of erenumab in women with self-reported menstrual migraine. METHODS: Patients received placebo, erenumab 70 mg, or erenumab 140 mg subcutaneously once monthly during the 6-month double-blind treatment phase of STRIVE. Women who reported history of menstrual migraine and who were ≤ 50 years old were included in the analysis. Endpoints were change from baseline in monthly migraine days (MMD) and monthly acute migraine-specific medication days (MSMD; among patients who took acute migraine-specific medications at baseline), proportion of patients achieving ≥ 50% reduction from baseline in MMD, and incidence of adverse events. RESULTS: Among 814 women enrolled in STRIVE, 232 (28.5%) reported a history of menstrual migraine and were ≤ 50 years old. Of the 232 patients, 214 (92%) had a baseline MMD > 5, suggesting a high proportion of women with attacks outside of the 5-day perimenstrual window (2 days before and 3 days after the start of menstruation). Information on “migraine days” includes (and does not discriminate between) perimenstrual and intermenstrual migraine attacks. Between-group differences from placebo over months 4–6 for erenumab 70 mg and 140 mg were − 1.8 (P = 0.001) and − 2.1 (P < 0.001) days for MMD and − 1.6 (P = 0.002) and − 2.4 (P < 0.001) days for acute MSMD, respectively. The odds of having a ≥ 50% reduction from baseline in MMD over months 4–6 were 2.2 (P = 0.024) and 2.8 (P = 0.002) times greater for erenumab 70 mg and 140 mg, respectively, than for placebo. Erenumab had an overall safety profile comparable to placebo. CONCLUSION: Data from this subgroup analysis of women with menstrual migraine are consistent with data from the overall STRIVE episodic migraine population, supporting the efficacy and safety of erenumab in women who experience menstrual migraine. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02456740. Registered 28 May 2015. Springer Milan 2020-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7398400/ /pubmed/32746775 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-020-01167-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Pavlovic, Jelena M. Paemeleire, Koen Göbel, Hartmut Bonner, Jo Rapoport, Alan Kagan, Risa Zhang, Feng Picard, Hernan Mikol, Daniel D. Efficacy and safety of erenumab in women with a history of menstrual migraine |
title | Efficacy and safety of erenumab in women with a history of menstrual migraine |
title_full | Efficacy and safety of erenumab in women with a history of menstrual migraine |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and safety of erenumab in women with a history of menstrual migraine |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and safety of erenumab in women with a history of menstrual migraine |
title_short | Efficacy and safety of erenumab in women with a history of menstrual migraine |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of erenumab in women with a history of menstrual migraine |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7398400/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32746775 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-020-01167-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pavlovicjelenam efficacyandsafetyoferenumabinwomenwithahistoryofmenstrualmigraine AT paemeleirekoen efficacyandsafetyoferenumabinwomenwithahistoryofmenstrualmigraine AT gobelhartmut efficacyandsafetyoferenumabinwomenwithahistoryofmenstrualmigraine AT bonnerjo efficacyandsafetyoferenumabinwomenwithahistoryofmenstrualmigraine AT rapoportalan efficacyandsafetyoferenumabinwomenwithahistoryofmenstrualmigraine AT kaganrisa efficacyandsafetyoferenumabinwomenwithahistoryofmenstrualmigraine AT zhangfeng efficacyandsafetyoferenumabinwomenwithahistoryofmenstrualmigraine AT picardhernan efficacyandsafetyoferenumabinwomenwithahistoryofmenstrualmigraine AT mikoldanield efficacyandsafetyoferenumabinwomenwithahistoryofmenstrualmigraine |