Cargando…

Post-surgery and recovery experiences following one- and two-stage revision for prosthetic joint infection—A qualitative study of patients’ experiences

Deep prosthetic hip infection is a devastating complication of hip replacement surgery, and treatment often involves multiple revision surgeries with antibiotic chemotherapy to control the infection. The aim of this study was to explore patients’ experiences of early and longer-term recovery after o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Palmer, Cecily K., Gooberman-Hill, Rachael, Blom, Ashley W., Whitehouse, Michael R., Moore, Andrew J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7398523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32745086
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237047
_version_ 1783565975645323264
author Palmer, Cecily K.
Gooberman-Hill, Rachael
Blom, Ashley W.
Whitehouse, Michael R.
Moore, Andrew J.
author_facet Palmer, Cecily K.
Gooberman-Hill, Rachael
Blom, Ashley W.
Whitehouse, Michael R.
Moore, Andrew J.
author_sort Palmer, Cecily K.
collection PubMed
description Deep prosthetic hip infection is a devastating complication of hip replacement surgery, and treatment often involves multiple revision surgeries with antibiotic chemotherapy to control the infection. The aim of this study was to explore patients’ experiences of early and longer-term recovery after one-stage or two-stage revision with an excised hip, a temporary cement spacer or a custom-made articulating spacer. We interviewed 32 participants taking part in a surgical trial at two time points (2–4 months and 18 months) following one- or two-stage revision surgery. The analytic approach was inductive using the constant comparative method to generate themes from the data. Participants’ early recovery after revision was characterised by a long hospital stay with burdensome antibiotics and limited physiotherapy provision. Participants undergoing two-stage revision with an excised hip or a cement spacer described severe mobility restrictions which affected all aspects of their lives, while those undergoing one-stage revision, or two-stage revision with an articulating spacer were more mobile and independent, with some limitations. Participants with a cement spacer also reported more pain than other treatment groups, while those with an articulating spacer appeared to perceive that their recovery was slow. At 18 months, participants in all groups described both improvements and losses in mobility and functional ability. Participants in all treatment groups expressed considerable emotional resilience during recovery from revision, which may be linked to opportunities to talk with the trial personnel. Participants identified the need for better information and psychological and physical support. Experience of recovery differs after one- and two-stage revision, and further in relation to the use of spacers. Mobility, function, independence and pain are important aspects of recovery which affect all aspects of day-to-day life. Increased information and more opportunities to talk and share experiences may provide psychological support during recovery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7398523
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73985232020-08-14 Post-surgery and recovery experiences following one- and two-stage revision for prosthetic joint infection—A qualitative study of patients’ experiences Palmer, Cecily K. Gooberman-Hill, Rachael Blom, Ashley W. Whitehouse, Michael R. Moore, Andrew J. PLoS One Research Article Deep prosthetic hip infection is a devastating complication of hip replacement surgery, and treatment often involves multiple revision surgeries with antibiotic chemotherapy to control the infection. The aim of this study was to explore patients’ experiences of early and longer-term recovery after one-stage or two-stage revision with an excised hip, a temporary cement spacer or a custom-made articulating spacer. We interviewed 32 participants taking part in a surgical trial at two time points (2–4 months and 18 months) following one- or two-stage revision surgery. The analytic approach was inductive using the constant comparative method to generate themes from the data. Participants’ early recovery after revision was characterised by a long hospital stay with burdensome antibiotics and limited physiotherapy provision. Participants undergoing two-stage revision with an excised hip or a cement spacer described severe mobility restrictions which affected all aspects of their lives, while those undergoing one-stage revision, or two-stage revision with an articulating spacer were more mobile and independent, with some limitations. Participants with a cement spacer also reported more pain than other treatment groups, while those with an articulating spacer appeared to perceive that their recovery was slow. At 18 months, participants in all groups described both improvements and losses in mobility and functional ability. Participants in all treatment groups expressed considerable emotional resilience during recovery from revision, which may be linked to opportunities to talk with the trial personnel. Participants identified the need for better information and psychological and physical support. Experience of recovery differs after one- and two-stage revision, and further in relation to the use of spacers. Mobility, function, independence and pain are important aspects of recovery which affect all aspects of day-to-day life. Increased information and more opportunities to talk and share experiences may provide psychological support during recovery. Public Library of Science 2020-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7398523/ /pubmed/32745086 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237047 Text en © 2020 Palmer et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Palmer, Cecily K.
Gooberman-Hill, Rachael
Blom, Ashley W.
Whitehouse, Michael R.
Moore, Andrew J.
Post-surgery and recovery experiences following one- and two-stage revision for prosthetic joint infection—A qualitative study of patients’ experiences
title Post-surgery and recovery experiences following one- and two-stage revision for prosthetic joint infection—A qualitative study of patients’ experiences
title_full Post-surgery and recovery experiences following one- and two-stage revision for prosthetic joint infection—A qualitative study of patients’ experiences
title_fullStr Post-surgery and recovery experiences following one- and two-stage revision for prosthetic joint infection—A qualitative study of patients’ experiences
title_full_unstemmed Post-surgery and recovery experiences following one- and two-stage revision for prosthetic joint infection—A qualitative study of patients’ experiences
title_short Post-surgery and recovery experiences following one- and two-stage revision for prosthetic joint infection—A qualitative study of patients’ experiences
title_sort post-surgery and recovery experiences following one- and two-stage revision for prosthetic joint infection—a qualitative study of patients’ experiences
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7398523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32745086
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237047
work_keys_str_mv AT palmercecilyk postsurgeryandrecoveryexperiencesfollowingoneandtwostagerevisionforprostheticjointinfectionaqualitativestudyofpatientsexperiences
AT goobermanhillrachael postsurgeryandrecoveryexperiencesfollowingoneandtwostagerevisionforprostheticjointinfectionaqualitativestudyofpatientsexperiences
AT blomashleyw postsurgeryandrecoveryexperiencesfollowingoneandtwostagerevisionforprostheticjointinfectionaqualitativestudyofpatientsexperiences
AT whitehousemichaelr postsurgeryandrecoveryexperiencesfollowingoneandtwostagerevisionforprostheticjointinfectionaqualitativestudyofpatientsexperiences
AT mooreandrewj postsurgeryandrecoveryexperiencesfollowingoneandtwostagerevisionforprostheticjointinfectionaqualitativestudyofpatientsexperiences