Cargando…

Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) in COPD Clinical Trials: Trends and Gaps

Key characteristics of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) that significantly affect health-related quality of life (HRQoL) include chest symptoms, dyspnea, cough, sputum production, and exacerbations. Additional areas of impact are sleep, fatigue, emotional well-being, social functioning,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Afroz, Nuzhat, Gutzwiller, Florian S, Mackay, Alex J, Naujoks, Christel, Patalano, Francesco, Kostikas, Konstantinos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7398869/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32801678
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S235845
_version_ 1783566030125137920
author Afroz, Nuzhat
Gutzwiller, Florian S
Mackay, Alex J
Naujoks, Christel
Patalano, Francesco
Kostikas, Konstantinos
author_facet Afroz, Nuzhat
Gutzwiller, Florian S
Mackay, Alex J
Naujoks, Christel
Patalano, Francesco
Kostikas, Konstantinos
author_sort Afroz, Nuzhat
collection PubMed
description Key characteristics of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) that significantly affect health-related quality of life (HRQoL) include chest symptoms, dyspnea, cough, sputum production, and exacerbations. Additional areas of impact are sleep, fatigue, emotional well-being, social functioning, and coping. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are essential to evaluate symptoms, impact of symptoms on activities of daily living, and treatment response. This review summarizes COPD-specific PRO endpoints from randomized controlled trials of approved and commonly used COPD drugs. A search conducted in “ClinicalTrials.gov” to identify COPD clinical trials (only completed Phase III and IV) incorporating PRO endpoints yielded a total of 104 clinical trials for inclusion in this analysis. Both symptom-based and HRQoL-specific PRO measures were reported. Several COPD-specific PRO measures are available; however, the St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) and the Baseline and Transition Dyspnea Indexes (BDI/TDI) were reported in the majority of the studies. Results reflected a gap in terms of full coverage of key impacted areas from a patient’s perspective. Methodological issues identified in this review related to scoring of instruments require careful consideration, as these challenges may limit the complete assessment of drug benefits. Selection of PRO measures aligned with the expected treatment benefit of a drug in a clinical trial should reflect patients’ perspective holistically.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7398869
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73988692020-08-14 Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) in COPD Clinical Trials: Trends and Gaps Afroz, Nuzhat Gutzwiller, Florian S Mackay, Alex J Naujoks, Christel Patalano, Francesco Kostikas, Konstantinos Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Review Key characteristics of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) that significantly affect health-related quality of life (HRQoL) include chest symptoms, dyspnea, cough, sputum production, and exacerbations. Additional areas of impact are sleep, fatigue, emotional well-being, social functioning, and coping. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are essential to evaluate symptoms, impact of symptoms on activities of daily living, and treatment response. This review summarizes COPD-specific PRO endpoints from randomized controlled trials of approved and commonly used COPD drugs. A search conducted in “ClinicalTrials.gov” to identify COPD clinical trials (only completed Phase III and IV) incorporating PRO endpoints yielded a total of 104 clinical trials for inclusion in this analysis. Both symptom-based and HRQoL-specific PRO measures were reported. Several COPD-specific PRO measures are available; however, the St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) and the Baseline and Transition Dyspnea Indexes (BDI/TDI) were reported in the majority of the studies. Results reflected a gap in terms of full coverage of key impacted areas from a patient’s perspective. Methodological issues identified in this review related to scoring of instruments require careful consideration, as these challenges may limit the complete assessment of drug benefits. Selection of PRO measures aligned with the expected treatment benefit of a drug in a clinical trial should reflect patients’ perspective holistically. Dove 2020-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7398869/ /pubmed/32801678 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S235845 Text en © 2020 Afroz et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Review
Afroz, Nuzhat
Gutzwiller, Florian S
Mackay, Alex J
Naujoks, Christel
Patalano, Francesco
Kostikas, Konstantinos
Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) in COPD Clinical Trials: Trends and Gaps
title Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) in COPD Clinical Trials: Trends and Gaps
title_full Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) in COPD Clinical Trials: Trends and Gaps
title_fullStr Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) in COPD Clinical Trials: Trends and Gaps
title_full_unstemmed Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) in COPD Clinical Trials: Trends and Gaps
title_short Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) in COPD Clinical Trials: Trends and Gaps
title_sort patient-reported outcomes (pros) in copd clinical trials: trends and gaps
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7398869/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32801678
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S235845
work_keys_str_mv AT afroznuzhat patientreportedoutcomesprosincopdclinicaltrialstrendsandgaps
AT gutzwillerflorians patientreportedoutcomesprosincopdclinicaltrialstrendsandgaps
AT mackayalexj patientreportedoutcomesprosincopdclinicaltrialstrendsandgaps
AT naujokschristel patientreportedoutcomesprosincopdclinicaltrialstrendsandgaps
AT patalanofrancesco patientreportedoutcomesprosincopdclinicaltrialstrendsandgaps
AT kostikaskonstantinos patientreportedoutcomesprosincopdclinicaltrialstrendsandgaps