Cargando…

Audiovisual and lexical cues do not additively enhance perceptual adaptation

When listeners experience difficulty in understanding a speaker, lexical and audiovisual (or lipreading) information can be a helpful source of guidance. These two types of information embedded in speech can also guide perceptual adjustment, also known as recalibration or perceptual retuning. With r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ullas, Shruti, Formisano, Elia, Eisner, Frank, Cutler, Anne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7398951/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32319002
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01728-5
_version_ 1783566049516453888
author Ullas, Shruti
Formisano, Elia
Eisner, Frank
Cutler, Anne
author_facet Ullas, Shruti
Formisano, Elia
Eisner, Frank
Cutler, Anne
author_sort Ullas, Shruti
collection PubMed
description When listeners experience difficulty in understanding a speaker, lexical and audiovisual (or lipreading) information can be a helpful source of guidance. These two types of information embedded in speech can also guide perceptual adjustment, also known as recalibration or perceptual retuning. With retuning or recalibration, listeners can use these contextual cues to temporarily or permanently reconfigure internal representations of phoneme categories to adjust to and understand novel interlocutors more easily. These two types of perceptual learning, previously investigated in large part separately, are highly similar in allowing listeners to use speech-external information to make phoneme boundary adjustments. This study explored whether the two sources may work in conjunction to induce adaptation, thus emulating real life, in which listeners are indeed likely to encounter both types of cue together. Listeners who received combined audiovisual and lexical cues showed perceptual learning effects similar to listeners who only received audiovisual cues, while listeners who received only lexical cues showed weaker effects compared with the two other groups. The combination of cues did not lead to additive retuning or recalibration effects, suggesting that lexical and audiovisual cues operate differently with regard to how listeners use them for reshaping perceptual categories. Reaction times did not significantly differ across the three conditions, so none of the forms of adjustment were either aided or hindered by processing time differences. Mechanisms underlying these forms of perceptual learning may diverge in numerous ways despite similarities in experimental applications. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.3758/s13423-020-01728-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7398951
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73989512020-08-13 Audiovisual and lexical cues do not additively enhance perceptual adaptation Ullas, Shruti Formisano, Elia Eisner, Frank Cutler, Anne Psychon Bull Rev Article When listeners experience difficulty in understanding a speaker, lexical and audiovisual (or lipreading) information can be a helpful source of guidance. These two types of information embedded in speech can also guide perceptual adjustment, also known as recalibration or perceptual retuning. With retuning or recalibration, listeners can use these contextual cues to temporarily or permanently reconfigure internal representations of phoneme categories to adjust to and understand novel interlocutors more easily. These two types of perceptual learning, previously investigated in large part separately, are highly similar in allowing listeners to use speech-external information to make phoneme boundary adjustments. This study explored whether the two sources may work in conjunction to induce adaptation, thus emulating real life, in which listeners are indeed likely to encounter both types of cue together. Listeners who received combined audiovisual and lexical cues showed perceptual learning effects similar to listeners who only received audiovisual cues, while listeners who received only lexical cues showed weaker effects compared with the two other groups. The combination of cues did not lead to additive retuning or recalibration effects, suggesting that lexical and audiovisual cues operate differently with regard to how listeners use them for reshaping perceptual categories. Reaction times did not significantly differ across the three conditions, so none of the forms of adjustment were either aided or hindered by processing time differences. Mechanisms underlying these forms of perceptual learning may diverge in numerous ways despite similarities in experimental applications. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.3758/s13423-020-01728-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2020-04-21 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7398951/ /pubmed/32319002 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01728-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Ullas, Shruti
Formisano, Elia
Eisner, Frank
Cutler, Anne
Audiovisual and lexical cues do not additively enhance perceptual adaptation
title Audiovisual and lexical cues do not additively enhance perceptual adaptation
title_full Audiovisual and lexical cues do not additively enhance perceptual adaptation
title_fullStr Audiovisual and lexical cues do not additively enhance perceptual adaptation
title_full_unstemmed Audiovisual and lexical cues do not additively enhance perceptual adaptation
title_short Audiovisual and lexical cues do not additively enhance perceptual adaptation
title_sort audiovisual and lexical cues do not additively enhance perceptual adaptation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7398951/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32319002
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01728-5
work_keys_str_mv AT ullasshruti audiovisualandlexicalcuesdonotadditivelyenhanceperceptualadaptation
AT formisanoelia audiovisualandlexicalcuesdonotadditivelyenhanceperceptualadaptation
AT eisnerfrank audiovisualandlexicalcuesdonotadditivelyenhanceperceptualadaptation
AT cutleranne audiovisualandlexicalcuesdonotadditivelyenhanceperceptualadaptation