Cargando…

DBT-galactography: a promising tool for improving the diagnostic workup of nipple discharge

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to compare the diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT)-galactography with that of full-field digital (FFD)-galactography for detecting intraductal breast lesions using an intra-individual design. METHODS: Forty-nine consecutive patients with spontaneous,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moschetta, Marco, De Ruvo, Vincenzo, Drago, Angelica, Troiano, Nicoletta, Paolicelli, Simona, Rubini, Giuseppe, Stabile Ianora, Amato Antonio, Telegrafo, Michele
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7399007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32748294
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41747-020-00170-5
_version_ 1783566062196883456
author Moschetta, Marco
De Ruvo, Vincenzo
Drago, Angelica
Troiano, Nicoletta
Paolicelli, Simona
Rubini, Giuseppe
Stabile Ianora, Amato Antonio
Telegrafo, Michele
author_facet Moschetta, Marco
De Ruvo, Vincenzo
Drago, Angelica
Troiano, Nicoletta
Paolicelli, Simona
Rubini, Giuseppe
Stabile Ianora, Amato Antonio
Telegrafo, Michele
author_sort Moschetta, Marco
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Our aim was to compare the diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT)-galactography with that of full-field digital (FFD)-galactography for detecting intraductal breast lesions using an intra-individual design. METHODS: Forty-nine consecutive patients with spontaneous, unilateral, single-pore nipple discharge and inconclusive FFD mammography and ultrasonography underwent galactography with a “COMBO” technique combining FFD- and DBT-galactography acquisitions. Examinations were independently analysed by two breast radiologists with 10-year experience. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for both FFD- and DBT-galactography were calculated having histological examinations of surgical specimens as a reference standard. Data were presented as percentages with their 95% confidence intervals (CI). McNemar test was used. Interobserver agreement was assessed by using Cohen κ test for both techniques. RESULTS: Sensitivity was 41/43 (95%, 95% CI 84.2–99.4) for DBT-galactography and 33/43 (77%, 95% CI 61.4–88.2) for FFD-galactography (p = 0.008), specificity 6/6 (100%, 95% CI 54.1–100.0) for both imaging tools, accuracy 47/49 (96%, 95% CI 86.0–99.5) and 39/49 (80%, 95% CI 65.7–89.8) (p = 0.038), respectively. The inter-observer agreement was 0.86 for DBT-galactography and 0.78 for FFD-galactography. The AGD resulted to 1.94 ± 0.64 for the combined technique. CONCLUSION: DBT-galactography showed a significantly higher sensitivity and accuracy than FFD-galactography for the identification of the intraductal findings, improving the possibility of a reliable diagnosis in patients with pathologic nipple-discharge.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7399007
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73990072020-08-13 DBT-galactography: a promising tool for improving the diagnostic workup of nipple discharge Moschetta, Marco De Ruvo, Vincenzo Drago, Angelica Troiano, Nicoletta Paolicelli, Simona Rubini, Giuseppe Stabile Ianora, Amato Antonio Telegrafo, Michele Eur Radiol Exp Original Article BACKGROUND: Our aim was to compare the diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT)-galactography with that of full-field digital (FFD)-galactography for detecting intraductal breast lesions using an intra-individual design. METHODS: Forty-nine consecutive patients with spontaneous, unilateral, single-pore nipple discharge and inconclusive FFD mammography and ultrasonography underwent galactography with a “COMBO” technique combining FFD- and DBT-galactography acquisitions. Examinations were independently analysed by two breast radiologists with 10-year experience. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for both FFD- and DBT-galactography were calculated having histological examinations of surgical specimens as a reference standard. Data were presented as percentages with their 95% confidence intervals (CI). McNemar test was used. Interobserver agreement was assessed by using Cohen κ test for both techniques. RESULTS: Sensitivity was 41/43 (95%, 95% CI 84.2–99.4) for DBT-galactography and 33/43 (77%, 95% CI 61.4–88.2) for FFD-galactography (p = 0.008), specificity 6/6 (100%, 95% CI 54.1–100.0) for both imaging tools, accuracy 47/49 (96%, 95% CI 86.0–99.5) and 39/49 (80%, 95% CI 65.7–89.8) (p = 0.038), respectively. The inter-observer agreement was 0.86 for DBT-galactography and 0.78 for FFD-galactography. The AGD resulted to 1.94 ± 0.64 for the combined technique. CONCLUSION: DBT-galactography showed a significantly higher sensitivity and accuracy than FFD-galactography for the identification of the intraductal findings, improving the possibility of a reliable diagnosis in patients with pathologic nipple-discharge. Springer International Publishing 2020-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7399007/ /pubmed/32748294 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41747-020-00170-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Moschetta, Marco
De Ruvo, Vincenzo
Drago, Angelica
Troiano, Nicoletta
Paolicelli, Simona
Rubini, Giuseppe
Stabile Ianora, Amato Antonio
Telegrafo, Michele
DBT-galactography: a promising tool for improving the diagnostic workup of nipple discharge
title DBT-galactography: a promising tool for improving the diagnostic workup of nipple discharge
title_full DBT-galactography: a promising tool for improving the diagnostic workup of nipple discharge
title_fullStr DBT-galactography: a promising tool for improving the diagnostic workup of nipple discharge
title_full_unstemmed DBT-galactography: a promising tool for improving the diagnostic workup of nipple discharge
title_short DBT-galactography: a promising tool for improving the diagnostic workup of nipple discharge
title_sort dbt-galactography: a promising tool for improving the diagnostic workup of nipple discharge
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7399007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32748294
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41747-020-00170-5
work_keys_str_mv AT moschettamarco dbtgalactographyapromisingtoolforimprovingthediagnosticworkupofnippledischarge
AT deruvovincenzo dbtgalactographyapromisingtoolforimprovingthediagnosticworkupofnippledischarge
AT dragoangelica dbtgalactographyapromisingtoolforimprovingthediagnosticworkupofnippledischarge
AT troianonicoletta dbtgalactographyapromisingtoolforimprovingthediagnosticworkupofnippledischarge
AT paolicellisimona dbtgalactographyapromisingtoolforimprovingthediagnosticworkupofnippledischarge
AT rubinigiuseppe dbtgalactographyapromisingtoolforimprovingthediagnosticworkupofnippledischarge
AT stabileianoraamatoantonio dbtgalactographyapromisingtoolforimprovingthediagnosticworkupofnippledischarge
AT telegrafomichele dbtgalactographyapromisingtoolforimprovingthediagnosticworkupofnippledischarge