Cargando…

Comparison of minimally invasive surgery for non-flail chest rib fractures: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: To evaluate therapeutic efficacy of minimally invasive and small incision surgery [minimally invasive surgery (MIS)] in patients with non-flail chest rib fractures through a prospective cohort study. METHODS: This study included 98 patients with non-flail chest rib fractures (≥3 displace...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Yang, Gao, Erji, Yang, Yi, Gao, Zongli, He, Weiwei, Zhao, Yonghong, Wu, Weiming, Zhao, Tiancheng, Guo, Xiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7399395/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32802450
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-19-2586
_version_ 1783566139009269760
author Li, Yang
Gao, Erji
Yang, Yi
Gao, Zongli
He, Weiwei
Zhao, Yonghong
Wu, Weiming
Zhao, Tiancheng
Guo, Xiang
author_facet Li, Yang
Gao, Erji
Yang, Yi
Gao, Zongli
He, Weiwei
Zhao, Yonghong
Wu, Weiming
Zhao, Tiancheng
Guo, Xiang
author_sort Li, Yang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To evaluate therapeutic efficacy of minimally invasive and small incision surgery [minimally invasive surgery (MIS)] in patients with non-flail chest rib fractures through a prospective cohort study. METHODS: This study included 98 patients with non-flail chest rib fractures (≥3 displaced fractures) and 66 patients undergoing MIS served as the experimental group and 32 patients receiving conservative treatment served as the matched control group. Pain index and indicators of pulmonary function [vital capacity (VC); forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1); peak expiratory flow (PEF)] for the two groups were assessed and compared at the time of admission and before discharge. In addition, duration of pain, time required for the patient to regain the ability to perform daily self-care, mental labor, and moderate-to-severe physical labor, and duration of chest discomfort were measured during long-term follow-up and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: There were also no significant differences (P>0.05) in pain index (8 vs. 8) or indicators of pulmonary function (VC: 31.0% vs. 26.5%; FEV1: 29.9% vs. 26.7%; PEF: 15.2% vs. 12.0%) were found between the MIS and conservative treatment groups at the time of admission; while pain index (3 vs. 6), VC (42.1% vs. 35.3%), and FEV1 (44.2% vs. 35.9%) were significantly different between the two groups (P<0.05) but not in PEF (21.2% vs. 19.6%) before discharge. Long-term follow-up showed that duration of pain, time required for the patient to regain the ability to engage in daily self-care, mental labor, and moderate-to-severe physical labor, and duration of chest discomfort in the MIS group were significantly more improved than in the conservative treatment group (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: MIS was a simple and safe treatment that significantly relieved chest pain and rapidly restored pulmonary function and improved the long-term quality of life of patients with non-flail chest rib fractures of ≥3 ribs with displacement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7399395
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73993952020-08-13 Comparison of minimally invasive surgery for non-flail chest rib fractures: a prospective cohort study Li, Yang Gao, Erji Yang, Yi Gao, Zongli He, Weiwei Zhao, Yonghong Wu, Weiming Zhao, Tiancheng Guo, Xiang J Thorac Dis Original Article BACKGROUND: To evaluate therapeutic efficacy of minimally invasive and small incision surgery [minimally invasive surgery (MIS)] in patients with non-flail chest rib fractures through a prospective cohort study. METHODS: This study included 98 patients with non-flail chest rib fractures (≥3 displaced fractures) and 66 patients undergoing MIS served as the experimental group and 32 patients receiving conservative treatment served as the matched control group. Pain index and indicators of pulmonary function [vital capacity (VC); forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1); peak expiratory flow (PEF)] for the two groups were assessed and compared at the time of admission and before discharge. In addition, duration of pain, time required for the patient to regain the ability to perform daily self-care, mental labor, and moderate-to-severe physical labor, and duration of chest discomfort were measured during long-term follow-up and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: There were also no significant differences (P>0.05) in pain index (8 vs. 8) or indicators of pulmonary function (VC: 31.0% vs. 26.5%; FEV1: 29.9% vs. 26.7%; PEF: 15.2% vs. 12.0%) were found between the MIS and conservative treatment groups at the time of admission; while pain index (3 vs. 6), VC (42.1% vs. 35.3%), and FEV1 (44.2% vs. 35.9%) were significantly different between the two groups (P<0.05) but not in PEF (21.2% vs. 19.6%) before discharge. Long-term follow-up showed that duration of pain, time required for the patient to regain the ability to engage in daily self-care, mental labor, and moderate-to-severe physical labor, and duration of chest discomfort in the MIS group were significantly more improved than in the conservative treatment group (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: MIS was a simple and safe treatment that significantly relieved chest pain and rapidly restored pulmonary function and improved the long-term quality of life of patients with non-flail chest rib fractures of ≥3 ribs with displacement. AME Publishing Company 2020-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7399395/ /pubmed/32802450 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-19-2586 Text en 2020 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Li, Yang
Gao, Erji
Yang, Yi
Gao, Zongli
He, Weiwei
Zhao, Yonghong
Wu, Weiming
Zhao, Tiancheng
Guo, Xiang
Comparison of minimally invasive surgery for non-flail chest rib fractures: a prospective cohort study
title Comparison of minimally invasive surgery for non-flail chest rib fractures: a prospective cohort study
title_full Comparison of minimally invasive surgery for non-flail chest rib fractures: a prospective cohort study
title_fullStr Comparison of minimally invasive surgery for non-flail chest rib fractures: a prospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of minimally invasive surgery for non-flail chest rib fractures: a prospective cohort study
title_short Comparison of minimally invasive surgery for non-flail chest rib fractures: a prospective cohort study
title_sort comparison of minimally invasive surgery for non-flail chest rib fractures: a prospective cohort study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7399395/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32802450
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-19-2586
work_keys_str_mv AT liyang comparisonofminimallyinvasivesurgeryfornonflailchestribfracturesaprospectivecohortstudy
AT gaoerji comparisonofminimallyinvasivesurgeryfornonflailchestribfracturesaprospectivecohortstudy
AT yangyi comparisonofminimallyinvasivesurgeryfornonflailchestribfracturesaprospectivecohortstudy
AT gaozongli comparisonofminimallyinvasivesurgeryfornonflailchestribfracturesaprospectivecohortstudy
AT heweiwei comparisonofminimallyinvasivesurgeryfornonflailchestribfracturesaprospectivecohortstudy
AT zhaoyonghong comparisonofminimallyinvasivesurgeryfornonflailchestribfracturesaprospectivecohortstudy
AT wuweiming comparisonofminimallyinvasivesurgeryfornonflailchestribfracturesaprospectivecohortstudy
AT zhaotiancheng comparisonofminimallyinvasivesurgeryfornonflailchestribfracturesaprospectivecohortstudy
AT guoxiang comparisonofminimallyinvasivesurgeryfornonflailchestribfracturesaprospectivecohortstudy