Cargando…

Developing laboratory capacity for Good Laboratory Practice certification: lessons from a Tanzanian insecticide testing facility

Background: With increasing insecticide resistance in malaria-endemic countries there is an urgent need for safe and effective novel vector control products. To improve the capacity of facilities that test insecticides in sub-Saharan Africa, a programme is supporting seven facilities towards Good La...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Begg, Sara, Wright, Alexandra, Small, Graham, Mosha, Franklin, Kirby, Matthew, Snetselaar, Janneke, Aziz, Salum, Bharmal, Jameel, Dacombe, Russell, Bates, Imelda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: F1000 Research Limited 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7399503/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32789289
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/gatesopenres.13133.1
_version_ 1783566161440407552
author Begg, Sara
Wright, Alexandra
Small, Graham
Mosha, Franklin
Kirby, Matthew
Snetselaar, Janneke
Aziz, Salum
Bharmal, Jameel
Dacombe, Russell
Bates, Imelda
author_facet Begg, Sara
Wright, Alexandra
Small, Graham
Mosha, Franklin
Kirby, Matthew
Snetselaar, Janneke
Aziz, Salum
Bharmal, Jameel
Dacombe, Russell
Bates, Imelda
author_sort Begg, Sara
collection PubMed
description Background: With increasing insecticide resistance in malaria-endemic countries there is an urgent need for safe and effective novel vector control products. To improve the capacity of facilities that test insecticides in sub-Saharan Africa, a programme is supporting seven facilities towards Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) certification, the globally recognized standard for quality management system (QMS) for the conduct of non-clinical and environmental studies. The World Health Organization (WHO) GLP Handbook provides guidance on a stepwise approach to implement a GLP compliant QMS. This study assesses auditor GLP checklists and timings outlined in the WHO GLP Handbook in the real-life context of a Tanzanian insecticide-testing facility, evaluating their implementation in this context. Methods and Principle Findings: We conducted document review and semi-structured interviews with staff at all levels of the test facility to explore factors that influenced progress towards GLP certification. We found that while auditor GLP checklists underemphasised computer systems, they were otherwise broadly applicable. Factors that delayed time to completion of GLP certification included the need for extensive infrastructure improvements, the availability of regional expertise related to GLP, the capacity of national and regional external systems and services to meet GLP compliance requirements, and training development required for Standard Operating Procedure implementation. Conclusion: The standards required for full GLP compliance are rigorous, with an expected completion timeline to implementation of 24 months. This study shows that in low and middle-income countries this timeline may be unrealistic due to challenges related to infrastructure development and lack of regional capacity and expertise. We recommend a comprehensive gap analysis when starting a project, including these areas which are beyond those recommended by the WHO GLP Handbook. These challenges can be successfully overcome and the experience in Tanzania provides key lessons for other facilities seeking GLP certification or the development of similar QMS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7399503
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher F1000 Research Limited
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73995032020-08-11 Developing laboratory capacity for Good Laboratory Practice certification: lessons from a Tanzanian insecticide testing facility Begg, Sara Wright, Alexandra Small, Graham Mosha, Franklin Kirby, Matthew Snetselaar, Janneke Aziz, Salum Bharmal, Jameel Dacombe, Russell Bates, Imelda Gates Open Res Research Article Background: With increasing insecticide resistance in malaria-endemic countries there is an urgent need for safe and effective novel vector control products. To improve the capacity of facilities that test insecticides in sub-Saharan Africa, a programme is supporting seven facilities towards Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) certification, the globally recognized standard for quality management system (QMS) for the conduct of non-clinical and environmental studies. The World Health Organization (WHO) GLP Handbook provides guidance on a stepwise approach to implement a GLP compliant QMS. This study assesses auditor GLP checklists and timings outlined in the WHO GLP Handbook in the real-life context of a Tanzanian insecticide-testing facility, evaluating their implementation in this context. Methods and Principle Findings: We conducted document review and semi-structured interviews with staff at all levels of the test facility to explore factors that influenced progress towards GLP certification. We found that while auditor GLP checklists underemphasised computer systems, they were otherwise broadly applicable. Factors that delayed time to completion of GLP certification included the need for extensive infrastructure improvements, the availability of regional expertise related to GLP, the capacity of national and regional external systems and services to meet GLP compliance requirements, and training development required for Standard Operating Procedure implementation. Conclusion: The standards required for full GLP compliance are rigorous, with an expected completion timeline to implementation of 24 months. This study shows that in low and middle-income countries this timeline may be unrealistic due to challenges related to infrastructure development and lack of regional capacity and expertise. We recommend a comprehensive gap analysis when starting a project, including these areas which are beyond those recommended by the WHO GLP Handbook. These challenges can be successfully overcome and the experience in Tanzania provides key lessons for other facilities seeking GLP certification or the development of similar QMS. F1000 Research Limited 2020-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7399503/ /pubmed/32789289 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/gatesopenres.13133.1 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Begg S et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Begg, Sara
Wright, Alexandra
Small, Graham
Mosha, Franklin
Kirby, Matthew
Snetselaar, Janneke
Aziz, Salum
Bharmal, Jameel
Dacombe, Russell
Bates, Imelda
Developing laboratory capacity for Good Laboratory Practice certification: lessons from a Tanzanian insecticide testing facility
title Developing laboratory capacity for Good Laboratory Practice certification: lessons from a Tanzanian insecticide testing facility
title_full Developing laboratory capacity for Good Laboratory Practice certification: lessons from a Tanzanian insecticide testing facility
title_fullStr Developing laboratory capacity for Good Laboratory Practice certification: lessons from a Tanzanian insecticide testing facility
title_full_unstemmed Developing laboratory capacity for Good Laboratory Practice certification: lessons from a Tanzanian insecticide testing facility
title_short Developing laboratory capacity for Good Laboratory Practice certification: lessons from a Tanzanian insecticide testing facility
title_sort developing laboratory capacity for good laboratory practice certification: lessons from a tanzanian insecticide testing facility
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7399503/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32789289
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/gatesopenres.13133.1
work_keys_str_mv AT beggsara developinglaboratorycapacityforgoodlaboratorypracticecertificationlessonsfromatanzanianinsecticidetestingfacility
AT wrightalexandra developinglaboratorycapacityforgoodlaboratorypracticecertificationlessonsfromatanzanianinsecticidetestingfacility
AT smallgraham developinglaboratorycapacityforgoodlaboratorypracticecertificationlessonsfromatanzanianinsecticidetestingfacility
AT moshafranklin developinglaboratorycapacityforgoodlaboratorypracticecertificationlessonsfromatanzanianinsecticidetestingfacility
AT kirbymatthew developinglaboratorycapacityforgoodlaboratorypracticecertificationlessonsfromatanzanianinsecticidetestingfacility
AT snetselaarjanneke developinglaboratorycapacityforgoodlaboratorypracticecertificationlessonsfromatanzanianinsecticidetestingfacility
AT azizsalum developinglaboratorycapacityforgoodlaboratorypracticecertificationlessonsfromatanzanianinsecticidetestingfacility
AT bharmaljameel developinglaboratorycapacityforgoodlaboratorypracticecertificationlessonsfromatanzanianinsecticidetestingfacility
AT dacomberussell developinglaboratorycapacityforgoodlaboratorypracticecertificationlessonsfromatanzanianinsecticidetestingfacility
AT batesimelda developinglaboratorycapacityforgoodlaboratorypracticecertificationlessonsfromatanzanianinsecticidetestingfacility