Cargando…

The disintegration of event files over time: Decay or interference?

When facing particular combinations of stimuli and responses, people create temporary event files integrating the corresponding stimulus and response features. Repeating one or more of these features retrieves the entire event file, which impairs performance if not all features repeat (partial-repet...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hommel, Bernhard, Frings, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7399672/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32378119
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01738-3
_version_ 1783566188057460736
author Hommel, Bernhard
Frings, Christian
author_facet Hommel, Bernhard
Frings, Christian
author_sort Hommel, Bernhard
collection PubMed
description When facing particular combinations of stimuli and responses, people create temporary event files integrating the corresponding stimulus and response features. Repeating one or more of these features retrieves the entire event file, which impairs performance if not all features repeat (partial-repetition costs). We studied how durable event files are over time and how sensitive they are to intervening objects or stimulus-response events. After-effects of relevant and irrelevant stimulus-response bindings were assessed after intervals of 1 to 5 s between creation and retrieval of the binding that were either unfilled (Experiment 1A), filled with 0, 2, or 4 presentations of the same neutral stimulus (1B), or of changing stimuli (1C), or filled with 0, 2, or 4 task-unrelated stimulus-response combinations (2A) or the same number of repetitions of the binding-inducing stimulus-response combination (2B). Taken altogether, the findings show a strong impact on the duration of the interval but no systematic effect of the type and number of intervening events. This suggests that event files disintegrate over time, as a function of spontaneous decay, but not due to interference from other bindings. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.3758/s13423-020-01738-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7399672
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73996722020-08-13 The disintegration of event files over time: Decay or interference? Hommel, Bernhard Frings, Christian Psychon Bull Rev Brief Report When facing particular combinations of stimuli and responses, people create temporary event files integrating the corresponding stimulus and response features. Repeating one or more of these features retrieves the entire event file, which impairs performance if not all features repeat (partial-repetition costs). We studied how durable event files are over time and how sensitive they are to intervening objects or stimulus-response events. After-effects of relevant and irrelevant stimulus-response bindings were assessed after intervals of 1 to 5 s between creation and retrieval of the binding that were either unfilled (Experiment 1A), filled with 0, 2, or 4 presentations of the same neutral stimulus (1B), or of changing stimuli (1C), or filled with 0, 2, or 4 task-unrelated stimulus-response combinations (2A) or the same number of repetitions of the binding-inducing stimulus-response combination (2B). Taken altogether, the findings show a strong impact on the duration of the interval but no systematic effect of the type and number of intervening events. This suggests that event files disintegrate over time, as a function of spontaneous decay, but not due to interference from other bindings. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.3758/s13423-020-01738-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2020-05-06 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7399672/ /pubmed/32378119 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01738-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Brief Report
Hommel, Bernhard
Frings, Christian
The disintegration of event files over time: Decay or interference?
title The disintegration of event files over time: Decay or interference?
title_full The disintegration of event files over time: Decay or interference?
title_fullStr The disintegration of event files over time: Decay or interference?
title_full_unstemmed The disintegration of event files over time: Decay or interference?
title_short The disintegration of event files over time: Decay or interference?
title_sort disintegration of event files over time: decay or interference?
topic Brief Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7399672/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32378119
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01738-3
work_keys_str_mv AT hommelbernhard thedisintegrationofeventfilesovertimedecayorinterference
AT fringschristian thedisintegrationofeventfilesovertimedecayorinterference
AT hommelbernhard disintegrationofeventfilesovertimedecayorinterference
AT fringschristian disintegrationofeventfilesovertimedecayorinterference