Cargando…

How should we define clinically significant improvement on Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) for patients undergoing Knee Meniscal Surgery?

OBJECTIVES: The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) attempts to optimize patient reported outcome (PRO) instruments by utilizing item response theory (IRT) and computer adaptive testing (CAT). Relatively little is known about clinically significant outcome (CSO) improve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lu, Yining, Nwachukwu, Benedict, Beletsky, Alexander, Patel, Bhavik, Yanke, Adam, Verma, Nikhil, Cole, Brian, Bush-Joseph, Charles, Bach, Bernard, Forsythe, Kelechi Okoroha Brian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7399714/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120S00459
_version_ 1783566196106330112
author Lu, Yining
Nwachukwu, Benedict
Beletsky, Alexander
Patel, Bhavik
Yanke, Adam
Verma, Nikhil
Cole, Brian
Bush-Joseph, Charles
Bach, Bernard
Forsythe, Kelechi Okoroha Brian
author_facet Lu, Yining
Nwachukwu, Benedict
Beletsky, Alexander
Patel, Bhavik
Yanke, Adam
Verma, Nikhil
Cole, Brian
Bush-Joseph, Charles
Bach, Bernard
Forsythe, Kelechi Okoroha Brian
author_sort Lu, Yining
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) attempts to optimize patient reported outcome (PRO) instruments by utilizing item response theory (IRT) and computer adaptive testing (CAT). Relatively little is known about clinically significant outcome (CSO) improvements on the PROMIS Physical Function (PF) CAT. The objective of this study is to define the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB) and patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) of the PROMIS PF CAT in arthroscopic meniscal surgery. METHODS: The PROMIS PF CAT, Short Form-12 Health Survey (SF-12 physical health [PCS] and mental health [MCS]), Veterans Rand-12 Health Survey (VR-12 physical health [PH] and mental health [MH]), and the Marx Activities Ratings Scale were administered pre- and post- operatively to patients undergoing arthroscopic meniscal surgery. Six months postoperatively, patients graded their knee function based on a domain-specific anchor question. Answers to the anchor questions were dichotomized to indicate achievement of SCB and MCID. A satisfaction anchor question was used to indicate achievement of PASS. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis determined the relevant psychometric values. Cutoff analysis was performed to find preoperative PRO scores predicting CSO achievement. RESULTS: Sixty patients (N = 27, 45% female) were included, with mean age of 45.0 ± 14.0 years and average follow up of 24.0 + 1.2 weeks. The most common indication for knee arthroscopy was partial meniscectomy (N = 53; 88.3%) followed by meniscal repair (N = 7; 11.7%). MCID on PROMIS PF was calculated to be 2.08 (AUC: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.57 - 0.94). Net score improvement equivalent to achievement of SCB was found to be 7.41 (AUC: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.55 – 0.99). PASS was found to be 45.47 (AUC: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.79-0.99). Preoperative score below 37.6 on the PROMIS PF CAT predicted achievement of MCID (AUC: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.64-0.88), while scores above 41.7 predicted achievement of PASS (AUC: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.63-0.89). Absence of pre-existing arthritis and higher baseline functional status were also found to be statistically significant predictors of achieving CSOs. CONCLUSION: Our study defined MCID, SCB, and PASS, for the PROMIS PF CAT. We found that a pre-operative score below 37.6 was predictive for achieving a meaningful clinical change with surgery, while a pre-operative score above 41.7 was predictive of achievement of an acceptable post-operative health state.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7399714
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73997142020-08-10 How should we define clinically significant improvement on Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) for patients undergoing Knee Meniscal Surgery? Lu, Yining Nwachukwu, Benedict Beletsky, Alexander Patel, Bhavik Yanke, Adam Verma, Nikhil Cole, Brian Bush-Joseph, Charles Bach, Bernard Forsythe, Kelechi Okoroha Brian Orthop J Sports Med Article OBJECTIVES: The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) attempts to optimize patient reported outcome (PRO) instruments by utilizing item response theory (IRT) and computer adaptive testing (CAT). Relatively little is known about clinically significant outcome (CSO) improvements on the PROMIS Physical Function (PF) CAT. The objective of this study is to define the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB) and patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) of the PROMIS PF CAT in arthroscopic meniscal surgery. METHODS: The PROMIS PF CAT, Short Form-12 Health Survey (SF-12 physical health [PCS] and mental health [MCS]), Veterans Rand-12 Health Survey (VR-12 physical health [PH] and mental health [MH]), and the Marx Activities Ratings Scale were administered pre- and post- operatively to patients undergoing arthroscopic meniscal surgery. Six months postoperatively, patients graded their knee function based on a domain-specific anchor question. Answers to the anchor questions were dichotomized to indicate achievement of SCB and MCID. A satisfaction anchor question was used to indicate achievement of PASS. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis determined the relevant psychometric values. Cutoff analysis was performed to find preoperative PRO scores predicting CSO achievement. RESULTS: Sixty patients (N = 27, 45% female) were included, with mean age of 45.0 ± 14.0 years and average follow up of 24.0 + 1.2 weeks. The most common indication for knee arthroscopy was partial meniscectomy (N = 53; 88.3%) followed by meniscal repair (N = 7; 11.7%). MCID on PROMIS PF was calculated to be 2.08 (AUC: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.57 - 0.94). Net score improvement equivalent to achievement of SCB was found to be 7.41 (AUC: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.55 – 0.99). PASS was found to be 45.47 (AUC: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.79-0.99). Preoperative score below 37.6 on the PROMIS PF CAT predicted achievement of MCID (AUC: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.64-0.88), while scores above 41.7 predicted achievement of PASS (AUC: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.63-0.89). Absence of pre-existing arthritis and higher baseline functional status were also found to be statistically significant predictors of achieving CSOs. CONCLUSION: Our study defined MCID, SCB, and PASS, for the PROMIS PF CAT. We found that a pre-operative score below 37.6 was predictive for achieving a meaningful clinical change with surgery, while a pre-operative score above 41.7 was predictive of achievement of an acceptable post-operative health state. SAGE Publications 2020-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7399714/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120S00459 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This open-access article is published and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - No Derivatives License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits the noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction of the article in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this article without the permission of the Author(s). For article reuse guidelines, please visit SAGE’s website at http://www.sagepub.com/journals-permissions.
spellingShingle Article
Lu, Yining
Nwachukwu, Benedict
Beletsky, Alexander
Patel, Bhavik
Yanke, Adam
Verma, Nikhil
Cole, Brian
Bush-Joseph, Charles
Bach, Bernard
Forsythe, Kelechi Okoroha Brian
How should we define clinically significant improvement on Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) for patients undergoing Knee Meniscal Surgery?
title How should we define clinically significant improvement on Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) for patients undergoing Knee Meniscal Surgery?
title_full How should we define clinically significant improvement on Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) for patients undergoing Knee Meniscal Surgery?
title_fullStr How should we define clinically significant improvement on Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) for patients undergoing Knee Meniscal Surgery?
title_full_unstemmed How should we define clinically significant improvement on Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) for patients undergoing Knee Meniscal Surgery?
title_short How should we define clinically significant improvement on Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) for patients undergoing Knee Meniscal Surgery?
title_sort how should we define clinically significant improvement on patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (promis) for patients undergoing knee meniscal surgery?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7399714/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120S00459
work_keys_str_mv AT luyining howshouldwedefineclinicallysignificantimprovementonpatientreportedoutcomesmeasurementinformationsystempromisforpatientsundergoingkneemeniscalsurgery
AT nwachukwubenedict howshouldwedefineclinicallysignificantimprovementonpatientreportedoutcomesmeasurementinformationsystempromisforpatientsundergoingkneemeniscalsurgery
AT beletskyalexander howshouldwedefineclinicallysignificantimprovementonpatientreportedoutcomesmeasurementinformationsystempromisforpatientsundergoingkneemeniscalsurgery
AT patelbhavik howshouldwedefineclinicallysignificantimprovementonpatientreportedoutcomesmeasurementinformationsystempromisforpatientsundergoingkneemeniscalsurgery
AT yankeadam howshouldwedefineclinicallysignificantimprovementonpatientreportedoutcomesmeasurementinformationsystempromisforpatientsundergoingkneemeniscalsurgery
AT vermanikhil howshouldwedefineclinicallysignificantimprovementonpatientreportedoutcomesmeasurementinformationsystempromisforpatientsundergoingkneemeniscalsurgery
AT colebrian howshouldwedefineclinicallysignificantimprovementonpatientreportedoutcomesmeasurementinformationsystempromisforpatientsundergoingkneemeniscalsurgery
AT bushjosephcharles howshouldwedefineclinicallysignificantimprovementonpatientreportedoutcomesmeasurementinformationsystempromisforpatientsundergoingkneemeniscalsurgery
AT bachbernard howshouldwedefineclinicallysignificantimprovementonpatientreportedoutcomesmeasurementinformationsystempromisforpatientsundergoingkneemeniscalsurgery
AT forsythekelechiokorohabrian howshouldwedefineclinicallysignificantimprovementonpatientreportedoutcomesmeasurementinformationsystempromisforpatientsundergoingkneemeniscalsurgery