Cargando…

Implementation Strategies for Web-Based Apps for Screening: Scoping Review

BACKGROUND: Screening is an effective primary prevention strategy in health care, as it enables the early detection of diseases. However, the uptake of such screening remains low. Different delivery methods for screening have been developed and found to be effective in increasing the uptake of scree...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ooi, Chor Yau, Ng, Chirk Jenn, Sales, Anne E, Lim, Hooi Min
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7400029/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32706655
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/15591
_version_ 1783566269269671936
author Ooi, Chor Yau
Ng, Chirk Jenn
Sales, Anne E
Lim, Hooi Min
author_facet Ooi, Chor Yau
Ng, Chirk Jenn
Sales, Anne E
Lim, Hooi Min
author_sort Ooi, Chor Yau
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Screening is an effective primary prevention strategy in health care, as it enables the early detection of diseases. However, the uptake of such screening remains low. Different delivery methods for screening have been developed and found to be effective in increasing the uptake of screening, including the use of web-based apps. Studies have shown that web-based apps for screening are effective in increasing the uptake of health screening among the general population. However, not much is known about the effective implementation of such web-based apps in the real-world setting. Implementation strategies are theory-based methods or techniques used to enhance the adoption, implementation, and sustainability of evidence-based interventions. Implementation strategies are important, as they allow us to understand how to implement an evidence-based intervention. Therefore, a scoping review to identify the various implementation strategies for web-based apps for screening is warranted. OBJECTIVE: This scoping review aims to identify (1) strategies used to implement web-based apps for health screening, (2) frameworks used for implementing web-based apps for health screening, (3) outcome measures of implementation strategies, and (4) effective implementation strategies. METHODS: This scoping review was conducted based on Arksey and O’Malley’s framework. After identifying the review question, two researchers independently screened and selected relevant literature from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO, International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number Registry, OpenGrey, ClinicalTrials.gov, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and Web of Science. This was followed by charting the data using a standardized form. Finally, we collated, summarized, and reported the results quantitatively and qualitatively based on the review objectives. RESULTS: A total of 16,476 studies were retrieved, of which 5669 were duplicates. From a total of 10,807 studies, 10,784 studies were excluded based on their titles and abstracts. There were 23 full-text articles reviewed, and 4 articles were included in the final analysis. Many studies were excluded because they focused on the effectiveness and not on the implementation of web-based apps. Facilitation was the most cited implementation strategy used, followed by reminders, clinical champions, and educational meetings and materials. Only 2 studies used implementation frameworks to guide the evaluation of their studies. Common outcome measures for implementation strategies were feasibility, fidelity, and penetration. Implementation strategies reported to be effective were quality improvement meetings, facilitation, educational meetings, and clinical champions. CONCLUSIONS: There is a dearth of literature on the implementation of web-based apps for health screening. Implementation strategies were developed without any reported use of implementation theories or frameworks in most studies. More research on the development and evaluation of web-based screening app implementations is needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7400029
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74000292020-08-17 Implementation Strategies for Web-Based Apps for Screening: Scoping Review Ooi, Chor Yau Ng, Chirk Jenn Sales, Anne E Lim, Hooi Min J Med Internet Res Review BACKGROUND: Screening is an effective primary prevention strategy in health care, as it enables the early detection of diseases. However, the uptake of such screening remains low. Different delivery methods for screening have been developed and found to be effective in increasing the uptake of screening, including the use of web-based apps. Studies have shown that web-based apps for screening are effective in increasing the uptake of health screening among the general population. However, not much is known about the effective implementation of such web-based apps in the real-world setting. Implementation strategies are theory-based methods or techniques used to enhance the adoption, implementation, and sustainability of evidence-based interventions. Implementation strategies are important, as they allow us to understand how to implement an evidence-based intervention. Therefore, a scoping review to identify the various implementation strategies for web-based apps for screening is warranted. OBJECTIVE: This scoping review aims to identify (1) strategies used to implement web-based apps for health screening, (2) frameworks used for implementing web-based apps for health screening, (3) outcome measures of implementation strategies, and (4) effective implementation strategies. METHODS: This scoping review was conducted based on Arksey and O’Malley’s framework. After identifying the review question, two researchers independently screened and selected relevant literature from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO, International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number Registry, OpenGrey, ClinicalTrials.gov, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and Web of Science. This was followed by charting the data using a standardized form. Finally, we collated, summarized, and reported the results quantitatively and qualitatively based on the review objectives. RESULTS: A total of 16,476 studies were retrieved, of which 5669 were duplicates. From a total of 10,807 studies, 10,784 studies were excluded based on their titles and abstracts. There were 23 full-text articles reviewed, and 4 articles were included in the final analysis. Many studies were excluded because they focused on the effectiveness and not on the implementation of web-based apps. Facilitation was the most cited implementation strategy used, followed by reminders, clinical champions, and educational meetings and materials. Only 2 studies used implementation frameworks to guide the evaluation of their studies. Common outcome measures for implementation strategies were feasibility, fidelity, and penetration. Implementation strategies reported to be effective were quality improvement meetings, facilitation, educational meetings, and clinical champions. CONCLUSIONS: There is a dearth of literature on the implementation of web-based apps for health screening. Implementation strategies were developed without any reported use of implementation theories or frameworks in most studies. More research on the development and evaluation of web-based screening app implementations is needed. JMIR Publications 2020-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7400029/ /pubmed/32706655 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/15591 Text en ©Chor Yau Ooi, Chirk Jenn Ng, Anne E Sales, Hooi Min Lim. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 20.07.2020. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Review
Ooi, Chor Yau
Ng, Chirk Jenn
Sales, Anne E
Lim, Hooi Min
Implementation Strategies for Web-Based Apps for Screening: Scoping Review
title Implementation Strategies for Web-Based Apps for Screening: Scoping Review
title_full Implementation Strategies for Web-Based Apps for Screening: Scoping Review
title_fullStr Implementation Strategies for Web-Based Apps for Screening: Scoping Review
title_full_unstemmed Implementation Strategies for Web-Based Apps for Screening: Scoping Review
title_short Implementation Strategies for Web-Based Apps for Screening: Scoping Review
title_sort implementation strategies for web-based apps for screening: scoping review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7400029/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32706655
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/15591
work_keys_str_mv AT ooichoryau implementationstrategiesforwebbasedappsforscreeningscopingreview
AT ngchirkjenn implementationstrategiesforwebbasedappsforscreeningscopingreview
AT salesannee implementationstrategiesforwebbasedappsforscreeningscopingreview
AT limhooimin implementationstrategiesforwebbasedappsforscreeningscopingreview