Cargando…

Psychological Impacts of the New Ways of Working (NWW): A Systematic Review

Digitalization of knowledge work is essential for today’s organizations, responding to diversified employee needs. Many organizations are already implementing some form of flexibility to help workers perform work and non-work duties, while maintaining high productivity. While these changes in workpl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kotera, Yasuhiro, Correa Vione, Katia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7400310/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32674518
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17145080
_version_ 1783566334256218112
author Kotera, Yasuhiro
Correa Vione, Katia
author_facet Kotera, Yasuhiro
Correa Vione, Katia
author_sort Kotera, Yasuhiro
collection PubMed
description Digitalization of knowledge work is essential for today’s organizations, responding to diversified employee needs. Many organizations are already implementing some form of flexibility to help workers perform work and non-work duties, while maintaining high productivity. While these changes in workplaces, “New Ways of Working (NWW)”, have been discussed in the literature, a systematic appraisal of evidence of NWW has not been conducted. Relating to poor work-related mental health worldwide, this systematic review analyzed the psychological impacts of NWW, and the quality and quantity of NWW research. Following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, NWW studies targeting psychological outcomes were evaluated. Initial literature search on ProQuest, PsycINFO, Science Direct, and Google Scholar retrieved 308 titles, from which seven articles fulfilled all inclusion criteria. Our appraisal revealed that NWW research evaluated diverse psychological outcomes. While NWW can help workers’ engagement, work-related flow, and connectivity among staff, NWW can also increase blurred work-home boundary, fatigue, and mental demands. The quality of NWW research was overall medium, needing more rigorous studies. Our findings can inform decision-makers in the workplace to effectively implement NWW, and researchers to improve the quality and the usefulness of future NWW studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7400310
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74003102020-08-23 Psychological Impacts of the New Ways of Working (NWW): A Systematic Review Kotera, Yasuhiro Correa Vione, Katia Int J Environ Res Public Health Review Digitalization of knowledge work is essential for today’s organizations, responding to diversified employee needs. Many organizations are already implementing some form of flexibility to help workers perform work and non-work duties, while maintaining high productivity. While these changes in workplaces, “New Ways of Working (NWW)”, have been discussed in the literature, a systematic appraisal of evidence of NWW has not been conducted. Relating to poor work-related mental health worldwide, this systematic review analyzed the psychological impacts of NWW, and the quality and quantity of NWW research. Following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, NWW studies targeting psychological outcomes were evaluated. Initial literature search on ProQuest, PsycINFO, Science Direct, and Google Scholar retrieved 308 titles, from which seven articles fulfilled all inclusion criteria. Our appraisal revealed that NWW research evaluated diverse psychological outcomes. While NWW can help workers’ engagement, work-related flow, and connectivity among staff, NWW can also increase blurred work-home boundary, fatigue, and mental demands. The quality of NWW research was overall medium, needing more rigorous studies. Our findings can inform decision-makers in the workplace to effectively implement NWW, and researchers to improve the quality and the usefulness of future NWW studies. MDPI 2020-07-14 2020-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7400310/ /pubmed/32674518 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17145080 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Kotera, Yasuhiro
Correa Vione, Katia
Psychological Impacts of the New Ways of Working (NWW): A Systematic Review
title Psychological Impacts of the New Ways of Working (NWW): A Systematic Review
title_full Psychological Impacts of the New Ways of Working (NWW): A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Psychological Impacts of the New Ways of Working (NWW): A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Psychological Impacts of the New Ways of Working (NWW): A Systematic Review
title_short Psychological Impacts of the New Ways of Working (NWW): A Systematic Review
title_sort psychological impacts of the new ways of working (nww): a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7400310/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32674518
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17145080
work_keys_str_mv AT koterayasuhiro psychologicalimpactsofthenewwaysofworkingnwwasystematicreview
AT correavionekatia psychologicalimpactsofthenewwaysofworkingnwwasystematicreview