Cargando…

“Good Epidemiology Practice” Guidelines for Pesticide Exposure Assessment

Both toxicology and epidemiology are used to inform hazard and risk assessment in regulatory settings, particularly for pesticides. While toxicology studies involve controlled, quantifiable exposures that are often administered according to standardized protocols, estimating exposure in observationa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goodman, Julie E., Prueitt, Robyn L., Boffetta, Paolo, Halsall, Crispin, Sweetman, Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7400458/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32679916
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17145114
_version_ 1783566368279363584
author Goodman, Julie E.
Prueitt, Robyn L.
Boffetta, Paolo
Halsall, Crispin
Sweetman, Andrew
author_facet Goodman, Julie E.
Prueitt, Robyn L.
Boffetta, Paolo
Halsall, Crispin
Sweetman, Andrew
author_sort Goodman, Julie E.
collection PubMed
description Both toxicology and epidemiology are used to inform hazard and risk assessment in regulatory settings, particularly for pesticides. While toxicology studies involve controlled, quantifiable exposures that are often administered according to standardized protocols, estimating exposure in observational epidemiology studies is challenging, and there is no established guidance for doing so. However, there are several frameworks for evaluating the quality of published epidemiology studies. We previously developed a preliminary list of methodology and reporting standards for epidemiology studies, called Good Epidemiology Practice (GEP) guidelines, based on a critical review of standardized toxicology protocols and available frameworks for evaluating epidemiology study quality. We determined that exposure characterization is one of the most critical areas for which standards are needed. Here, we propose GEP guidelines for pesticide exposure assessment based on the source of exposure data (i.e., biomonitoring and environmental samples, questionnaire/interview/expert record review, and dietary exposures based on measurements of residues in food and food consumption). It is expected that these GEP guidelines will facilitate the conduct of higher-quality epidemiology studies that can be used as a basis for more scientifically sound regulatory risk assessment and policy making.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7400458
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74004582020-08-07 “Good Epidemiology Practice” Guidelines for Pesticide Exposure Assessment Goodman, Julie E. Prueitt, Robyn L. Boffetta, Paolo Halsall, Crispin Sweetman, Andrew Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Both toxicology and epidemiology are used to inform hazard and risk assessment in regulatory settings, particularly for pesticides. While toxicology studies involve controlled, quantifiable exposures that are often administered according to standardized protocols, estimating exposure in observational epidemiology studies is challenging, and there is no established guidance for doing so. However, there are several frameworks for evaluating the quality of published epidemiology studies. We previously developed a preliminary list of methodology and reporting standards for epidemiology studies, called Good Epidemiology Practice (GEP) guidelines, based on a critical review of standardized toxicology protocols and available frameworks for evaluating epidemiology study quality. We determined that exposure characterization is one of the most critical areas for which standards are needed. Here, we propose GEP guidelines for pesticide exposure assessment based on the source of exposure data (i.e., biomonitoring and environmental samples, questionnaire/interview/expert record review, and dietary exposures based on measurements of residues in food and food consumption). It is expected that these GEP guidelines will facilitate the conduct of higher-quality epidemiology studies that can be used as a basis for more scientifically sound regulatory risk assessment and policy making. MDPI 2020-07-15 2020-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7400458/ /pubmed/32679916 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17145114 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Goodman, Julie E.
Prueitt, Robyn L.
Boffetta, Paolo
Halsall, Crispin
Sweetman, Andrew
“Good Epidemiology Practice” Guidelines for Pesticide Exposure Assessment
title “Good Epidemiology Practice” Guidelines for Pesticide Exposure Assessment
title_full “Good Epidemiology Practice” Guidelines for Pesticide Exposure Assessment
title_fullStr “Good Epidemiology Practice” Guidelines for Pesticide Exposure Assessment
title_full_unstemmed “Good Epidemiology Practice” Guidelines for Pesticide Exposure Assessment
title_short “Good Epidemiology Practice” Guidelines for Pesticide Exposure Assessment
title_sort “good epidemiology practice” guidelines for pesticide exposure assessment
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7400458/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32679916
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17145114
work_keys_str_mv AT goodmanjuliee goodepidemiologypracticeguidelinesforpesticideexposureassessment
AT prueittrobynl goodepidemiologypracticeguidelinesforpesticideexposureassessment
AT boffettapaolo goodepidemiologypracticeguidelinesforpesticideexposureassessment
AT halsallcrispin goodepidemiologypracticeguidelinesforpesticideexposureassessment
AT sweetmanandrew goodepidemiologypracticeguidelinesforpesticideexposureassessment