Cargando…
“Good Epidemiology Practice” Guidelines for Pesticide Exposure Assessment
Both toxicology and epidemiology are used to inform hazard and risk assessment in regulatory settings, particularly for pesticides. While toxicology studies involve controlled, quantifiable exposures that are often administered according to standardized protocols, estimating exposure in observationa...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7400458/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32679916 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17145114 |
_version_ | 1783566368279363584 |
---|---|
author | Goodman, Julie E. Prueitt, Robyn L. Boffetta, Paolo Halsall, Crispin Sweetman, Andrew |
author_facet | Goodman, Julie E. Prueitt, Robyn L. Boffetta, Paolo Halsall, Crispin Sweetman, Andrew |
author_sort | Goodman, Julie E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Both toxicology and epidemiology are used to inform hazard and risk assessment in regulatory settings, particularly for pesticides. While toxicology studies involve controlled, quantifiable exposures that are often administered according to standardized protocols, estimating exposure in observational epidemiology studies is challenging, and there is no established guidance for doing so. However, there are several frameworks for evaluating the quality of published epidemiology studies. We previously developed a preliminary list of methodology and reporting standards for epidemiology studies, called Good Epidemiology Practice (GEP) guidelines, based on a critical review of standardized toxicology protocols and available frameworks for evaluating epidemiology study quality. We determined that exposure characterization is one of the most critical areas for which standards are needed. Here, we propose GEP guidelines for pesticide exposure assessment based on the source of exposure data (i.e., biomonitoring and environmental samples, questionnaire/interview/expert record review, and dietary exposures based on measurements of residues in food and food consumption). It is expected that these GEP guidelines will facilitate the conduct of higher-quality epidemiology studies that can be used as a basis for more scientifically sound regulatory risk assessment and policy making. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7400458 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74004582020-08-07 “Good Epidemiology Practice” Guidelines for Pesticide Exposure Assessment Goodman, Julie E. Prueitt, Robyn L. Boffetta, Paolo Halsall, Crispin Sweetman, Andrew Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Both toxicology and epidemiology are used to inform hazard and risk assessment in regulatory settings, particularly for pesticides. While toxicology studies involve controlled, quantifiable exposures that are often administered according to standardized protocols, estimating exposure in observational epidemiology studies is challenging, and there is no established guidance for doing so. However, there are several frameworks for evaluating the quality of published epidemiology studies. We previously developed a preliminary list of methodology and reporting standards for epidemiology studies, called Good Epidemiology Practice (GEP) guidelines, based on a critical review of standardized toxicology protocols and available frameworks for evaluating epidemiology study quality. We determined that exposure characterization is one of the most critical areas for which standards are needed. Here, we propose GEP guidelines for pesticide exposure assessment based on the source of exposure data (i.e., biomonitoring and environmental samples, questionnaire/interview/expert record review, and dietary exposures based on measurements of residues in food and food consumption). It is expected that these GEP guidelines will facilitate the conduct of higher-quality epidemiology studies that can be used as a basis for more scientifically sound regulatory risk assessment and policy making. MDPI 2020-07-15 2020-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7400458/ /pubmed/32679916 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17145114 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Goodman, Julie E. Prueitt, Robyn L. Boffetta, Paolo Halsall, Crispin Sweetman, Andrew “Good Epidemiology Practice” Guidelines for Pesticide Exposure Assessment |
title | “Good Epidemiology Practice” Guidelines for Pesticide Exposure Assessment |
title_full | “Good Epidemiology Practice” Guidelines for Pesticide Exposure Assessment |
title_fullStr | “Good Epidemiology Practice” Guidelines for Pesticide Exposure Assessment |
title_full_unstemmed | “Good Epidemiology Practice” Guidelines for Pesticide Exposure Assessment |
title_short | “Good Epidemiology Practice” Guidelines for Pesticide Exposure Assessment |
title_sort | “good epidemiology practice” guidelines for pesticide exposure assessment |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7400458/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32679916 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17145114 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT goodmanjuliee goodepidemiologypracticeguidelinesforpesticideexposureassessment AT prueittrobynl goodepidemiologypracticeguidelinesforpesticideexposureassessment AT boffettapaolo goodepidemiologypracticeguidelinesforpesticideexposureassessment AT halsallcrispin goodepidemiologypracticeguidelinesforpesticideexposureassessment AT sweetmanandrew goodepidemiologypracticeguidelinesforpesticideexposureassessment |