Cargando…

Multidetector Computed Tomography with Dedicated Protocol for Breast Cancer Locoregional Staging: Feasibility Study

Background: The aim of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility of performing multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) with a dedicated protocol for locoregional staging in breast cancer patients. Methods: This prospective single-center study included newly diagnosed breast cancer patients subm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Felipe, Vinicius C., Graziano, Luciana, Barbosa, Paula N. V. P., Calsavara, Vinicius F., Bitencourt, Almir G. V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7400518/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32674511
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10070479
_version_ 1783566382395293696
author Felipe, Vinicius C.
Graziano, Luciana
Barbosa, Paula N. V. P.
Calsavara, Vinicius F.
Bitencourt, Almir G. V.
author_facet Felipe, Vinicius C.
Graziano, Luciana
Barbosa, Paula N. V. P.
Calsavara, Vinicius F.
Bitencourt, Almir G. V.
author_sort Felipe, Vinicius C.
collection PubMed
description Background: The aim of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility of performing multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) with a dedicated protocol for locoregional staging in breast cancer patients. Methods: This prospective single-center study included newly diagnosed breast cancer patients submitted to contrast-enhanced chest MDCT and breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MDCT was performed in prone position and using subtraction techniques. Fleiss’ Kappa coefficient (K) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were used to assess agreement between MRI, MDCT, and pathology, when available. Results: Thirty-three patients were included (mean age: 47 years). Breast MRI and MDCT showed at least substantial agreement for evaluation of tumor extension (k = 0.674), presence of multifocality (k = 0.669), multicentricity (k = 0.857), nipple invasion (k = 1.000), skin invasion (k = 0.872), and suspicious level I axillary lymph nodes (k = 0.613). MDCT showed higher number of suspicious axillary lymph nodes than MRI, especially on levels II and III. Both methods had similar correlation with tumor size (MRI ICC: 0.807; p = 0.008 vs. MDCT ICC: 0.750; p = 0.020) and T staging (k = 0.699) on pathology. Conclusions: MDCT with dedicated breast protocol is feasible and showed substantial agreement with MRI features in stage II or III breast cancer patients. This method could potentially allow one-step locoregional and systemic staging, reducing costs and improving logistics for these patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7400518
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74005182020-08-07 Multidetector Computed Tomography with Dedicated Protocol for Breast Cancer Locoregional Staging: Feasibility Study Felipe, Vinicius C. Graziano, Luciana Barbosa, Paula N. V. P. Calsavara, Vinicius F. Bitencourt, Almir G. V. Diagnostics (Basel) Article Background: The aim of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility of performing multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) with a dedicated protocol for locoregional staging in breast cancer patients. Methods: This prospective single-center study included newly diagnosed breast cancer patients submitted to contrast-enhanced chest MDCT and breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MDCT was performed in prone position and using subtraction techniques. Fleiss’ Kappa coefficient (K) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were used to assess agreement between MRI, MDCT, and pathology, when available. Results: Thirty-three patients were included (mean age: 47 years). Breast MRI and MDCT showed at least substantial agreement for evaluation of tumor extension (k = 0.674), presence of multifocality (k = 0.669), multicentricity (k = 0.857), nipple invasion (k = 1.000), skin invasion (k = 0.872), and suspicious level I axillary lymph nodes (k = 0.613). MDCT showed higher number of suspicious axillary lymph nodes than MRI, especially on levels II and III. Both methods had similar correlation with tumor size (MRI ICC: 0.807; p = 0.008 vs. MDCT ICC: 0.750; p = 0.020) and T staging (k = 0.699) on pathology. Conclusions: MDCT with dedicated breast protocol is feasible and showed substantial agreement with MRI features in stage II or III breast cancer patients. This method could potentially allow one-step locoregional and systemic staging, reducing costs and improving logistics for these patients. MDPI 2020-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7400518/ /pubmed/32674511 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10070479 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Felipe, Vinicius C.
Graziano, Luciana
Barbosa, Paula N. V. P.
Calsavara, Vinicius F.
Bitencourt, Almir G. V.
Multidetector Computed Tomography with Dedicated Protocol for Breast Cancer Locoregional Staging: Feasibility Study
title Multidetector Computed Tomography with Dedicated Protocol for Breast Cancer Locoregional Staging: Feasibility Study
title_full Multidetector Computed Tomography with Dedicated Protocol for Breast Cancer Locoregional Staging: Feasibility Study
title_fullStr Multidetector Computed Tomography with Dedicated Protocol for Breast Cancer Locoregional Staging: Feasibility Study
title_full_unstemmed Multidetector Computed Tomography with Dedicated Protocol for Breast Cancer Locoregional Staging: Feasibility Study
title_short Multidetector Computed Tomography with Dedicated Protocol for Breast Cancer Locoregional Staging: Feasibility Study
title_sort multidetector computed tomography with dedicated protocol for breast cancer locoregional staging: feasibility study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7400518/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32674511
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10070479
work_keys_str_mv AT felipeviniciusc multidetectorcomputedtomographywithdedicatedprotocolforbreastcancerlocoregionalstagingfeasibilitystudy
AT grazianoluciana multidetectorcomputedtomographywithdedicatedprotocolforbreastcancerlocoregionalstagingfeasibilitystudy
AT barbosapaulanvp multidetectorcomputedtomographywithdedicatedprotocolforbreastcancerlocoregionalstagingfeasibilitystudy
AT calsavaraviniciusf multidetectorcomputedtomographywithdedicatedprotocolforbreastcancerlocoregionalstagingfeasibilitystudy
AT bitencourtalmirgv multidetectorcomputedtomographywithdedicatedprotocolforbreastcancerlocoregionalstagingfeasibilitystudy