Cargando…

Chest CT findings of COVID-19-infected patients, are there differences between pediatric and adult patients? A systematic review

BACKGROUND: Purpose of this study was to deliver a report of chest CT findings of COVID-19-infected pediatric and adult patients and to make an age-based comparison. A systematic search was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines to identify relevant studies in the electronic databases of Pub...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Azadbakht, Javid, Haghi-Aminjan, Hamed, Farhood, Bagher
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7400749/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43055-020-00261-8
_version_ 1783566429710188544
author Azadbakht, Javid
Haghi-Aminjan, Hamed
Farhood, Bagher
author_facet Azadbakht, Javid
Haghi-Aminjan, Hamed
Farhood, Bagher
author_sort Azadbakht, Javid
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Purpose of this study was to deliver a report of chest CT findings of COVID-19-infected pediatric and adult patients and to make an age-based comparison. A systematic search was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines to identify relevant studies in the electronic databases of PubMed, Scopus, ProQuest, ScienceDirect, and Web of Sciences from January 1, 2020 to March 27, 2020 using search terms in the titles and abstracts. Based on our inclusion and exclusion criteria, 762 articles were screened. Finally, 15 eligible articles which had adequate data on chest CT findings of COVID-19-infected patients were enrolled in this systematic review. RESULTS: In pediatric patients (15 years old or younger), peripheral distribution was found in 100% of cases, ground glass opacities (GGO) in 55.2%, bilateral involvement in 50%, halo sign in 50%, unilateral involvement in 30%, consolidation in 22.2%, crazy paving pattern in 20%, nodular opacities in 15%, pleural effusion in 4.2%, lymphadenopathy in none, and normal imaging in 20.8% of cases. On the other hand, in adult patients, bilateral involvement was reported in 76.8%, GGO in 68.4%, peripheral distribution in 62.2%, mixed GGO and consolidation in 48.7%, consolidation in 33.7%, crazy paving pattern in 27.7%, mixed central and peripheral distribution in 25.0%, unilateral involvement in 15.2%, nodular opacities in 9.2%, pleural effusion in 5.5%, central distribution of lesions in 5.4%, lymphadenopathy in 2.4%, and normal imaging in 9.8% of cases. CONCLUSION: According to the findings of this systematic review, children infected with COVID-19 can present with normal or atypical findings (nodular opacities/unilateral involvement) in chest imaging more frequently than adult patients. Therefore, more caution should be taken to avoid misdiagnosis or missed diagnosis in infected children. Besides, clinical and laboratory findings need to be considered more decision-making for pediatric patients with normal or atypical chest CT scan but high suspicion of COVID-19.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7400749
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74007492020-08-04 Chest CT findings of COVID-19-infected patients, are there differences between pediatric and adult patients? A systematic review Azadbakht, Javid Haghi-Aminjan, Hamed Farhood, Bagher Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med Review BACKGROUND: Purpose of this study was to deliver a report of chest CT findings of COVID-19-infected pediatric and adult patients and to make an age-based comparison. A systematic search was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines to identify relevant studies in the electronic databases of PubMed, Scopus, ProQuest, ScienceDirect, and Web of Sciences from January 1, 2020 to March 27, 2020 using search terms in the titles and abstracts. Based on our inclusion and exclusion criteria, 762 articles were screened. Finally, 15 eligible articles which had adequate data on chest CT findings of COVID-19-infected patients were enrolled in this systematic review. RESULTS: In pediatric patients (15 years old or younger), peripheral distribution was found in 100% of cases, ground glass opacities (GGO) in 55.2%, bilateral involvement in 50%, halo sign in 50%, unilateral involvement in 30%, consolidation in 22.2%, crazy paving pattern in 20%, nodular opacities in 15%, pleural effusion in 4.2%, lymphadenopathy in none, and normal imaging in 20.8% of cases. On the other hand, in adult patients, bilateral involvement was reported in 76.8%, GGO in 68.4%, peripheral distribution in 62.2%, mixed GGO and consolidation in 48.7%, consolidation in 33.7%, crazy paving pattern in 27.7%, mixed central and peripheral distribution in 25.0%, unilateral involvement in 15.2%, nodular opacities in 9.2%, pleural effusion in 5.5%, central distribution of lesions in 5.4%, lymphadenopathy in 2.4%, and normal imaging in 9.8% of cases. CONCLUSION: According to the findings of this systematic review, children infected with COVID-19 can present with normal or atypical findings (nodular opacities/unilateral involvement) in chest imaging more frequently than adult patients. Therefore, more caution should be taken to avoid misdiagnosis or missed diagnosis in infected children. Besides, clinical and laboratory findings need to be considered more decision-making for pediatric patients with normal or atypical chest CT scan but high suspicion of COVID-19. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-08-04 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7400749/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43055-020-00261-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Review
Azadbakht, Javid
Haghi-Aminjan, Hamed
Farhood, Bagher
Chest CT findings of COVID-19-infected patients, are there differences between pediatric and adult patients? A systematic review
title Chest CT findings of COVID-19-infected patients, are there differences between pediatric and adult patients? A systematic review
title_full Chest CT findings of COVID-19-infected patients, are there differences between pediatric and adult patients? A systematic review
title_fullStr Chest CT findings of COVID-19-infected patients, are there differences between pediatric and adult patients? A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Chest CT findings of COVID-19-infected patients, are there differences between pediatric and adult patients? A systematic review
title_short Chest CT findings of COVID-19-infected patients, are there differences between pediatric and adult patients? A systematic review
title_sort chest ct findings of covid-19-infected patients, are there differences between pediatric and adult patients? a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7400749/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43055-020-00261-8
work_keys_str_mv AT azadbakhtjavid chestctfindingsofcovid19infectedpatientsaretheredifferencesbetweenpediatricandadultpatientsasystematicreview
AT haghiaminjanhamed chestctfindingsofcovid19infectedpatientsaretheredifferencesbetweenpediatricandadultpatientsasystematicreview
AT farhoodbagher chestctfindingsofcovid19infectedpatientsaretheredifferencesbetweenpediatricandadultpatientsasystematicreview