Cargando…

Impact of Insurance and Practice Type on Access to Orthopaedic Sports Medicine

BACKGROUND: The Patient Protection Affordable Care Act has expanded Medicaid eligibility in recent years. However, the provisions of the act have not translated to improved Medicaid payments for specialists such as orthopaedic surgeons. The number of health care practitioners who accept Medicaid is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shi, Weilong, Anastasio, Albert, Guisse, Ndeye F., Faraj, Razan, Fakunle, Omolola P., Easley, Kirk, Hammond, Kyle E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7401157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32782900
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120933696
_version_ 1783566505074491392
author Shi, Weilong
Anastasio, Albert
Guisse, Ndeye F.
Faraj, Razan
Fakunle, Omolola P.
Easley, Kirk
Hammond, Kyle E.
author_facet Shi, Weilong
Anastasio, Albert
Guisse, Ndeye F.
Faraj, Razan
Fakunle, Omolola P.
Easley, Kirk
Hammond, Kyle E.
author_sort Shi, Weilong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Patient Protection Affordable Care Act has expanded Medicaid eligibility in recent years. However, the provisions of the act have not translated to improved Medicaid payments for specialists such as orthopaedic surgeons. The number of health care practitioners who accept Medicaid is already decreasing, with low reimbursement rates being cited as the primary reason for the trend. HYPOTHESIS: Private practice orthopaedic groups will see patients with Medicaid or Medicare at lower rates than academic orthopaedic practices, and business days until appointment availability will be higher for patients with Medicaid and Medicare than those with private insurance. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: Researchers made calls to 2 regular-sized orthopaedic practices, 1 small orthopaedic practice, and 1 academic orthopaedic practice in each of the 50 states in the United States. Callers described a scenario of a recent injury resulting in a bucket-handle meniscal tear and an anterior cruciate ligament tear seen on magnetic resonance imaging at an outside emergency department. For a total of 194 practices, 3 separate telephone calls were made, each with a different insurance type. Data regarding insurance acceptance and business days until appointment were tabulated. Student t tests or analysis of variance for continuous data and χ(2) or Fisher exact tests for categorical data were utilized. RESULTS: After completing 582 telephone calls, it was determined that 31.4% (n = 59) did not accept Medicaid, compared with 2.2% (n = 4) not accepting Medicare and 1% (n = 1) not accepting private insurance (P < .001). There was no significant association between type of practice and Medicaid refusal (P = 0.12). Mean business days until appointment for Medicaid, Medicare, and private insurance were 5.3, 4.1, and 2.9, respectively (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Access to care remains a significant burden for the Medicaid population, given a rate of Medicaid refusal of 32.2% across regular-sized orthopaedic practices. If Medicaid is accepted, time until appointment was significantly longer when compared with private insurance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7401157
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74011572020-08-10 Impact of Insurance and Practice Type on Access to Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Shi, Weilong Anastasio, Albert Guisse, Ndeye F. Faraj, Razan Fakunle, Omolola P. Easley, Kirk Hammond, Kyle E. Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: The Patient Protection Affordable Care Act has expanded Medicaid eligibility in recent years. However, the provisions of the act have not translated to improved Medicaid payments for specialists such as orthopaedic surgeons. The number of health care practitioners who accept Medicaid is already decreasing, with low reimbursement rates being cited as the primary reason for the trend. HYPOTHESIS: Private practice orthopaedic groups will see patients with Medicaid or Medicare at lower rates than academic orthopaedic practices, and business days until appointment availability will be higher for patients with Medicaid and Medicare than those with private insurance. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: Researchers made calls to 2 regular-sized orthopaedic practices, 1 small orthopaedic practice, and 1 academic orthopaedic practice in each of the 50 states in the United States. Callers described a scenario of a recent injury resulting in a bucket-handle meniscal tear and an anterior cruciate ligament tear seen on magnetic resonance imaging at an outside emergency department. For a total of 194 practices, 3 separate telephone calls were made, each with a different insurance type. Data regarding insurance acceptance and business days until appointment were tabulated. Student t tests or analysis of variance for continuous data and χ(2) or Fisher exact tests for categorical data were utilized. RESULTS: After completing 582 telephone calls, it was determined that 31.4% (n = 59) did not accept Medicaid, compared with 2.2% (n = 4) not accepting Medicare and 1% (n = 1) not accepting private insurance (P < .001). There was no significant association between type of practice and Medicaid refusal (P = 0.12). Mean business days until appointment for Medicaid, Medicare, and private insurance were 5.3, 4.1, and 2.9, respectively (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Access to care remains a significant burden for the Medicaid population, given a rate of Medicaid refusal of 32.2% across regular-sized orthopaedic practices. If Medicaid is accepted, time until appointment was significantly longer when compared with private insurance. SAGE Publications 2020-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7401157/ /pubmed/32782900 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120933696 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Shi, Weilong
Anastasio, Albert
Guisse, Ndeye F.
Faraj, Razan
Fakunle, Omolola P.
Easley, Kirk
Hammond, Kyle E.
Impact of Insurance and Practice Type on Access to Orthopaedic Sports Medicine
title Impact of Insurance and Practice Type on Access to Orthopaedic Sports Medicine
title_full Impact of Insurance and Practice Type on Access to Orthopaedic Sports Medicine
title_fullStr Impact of Insurance and Practice Type on Access to Orthopaedic Sports Medicine
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Insurance and Practice Type on Access to Orthopaedic Sports Medicine
title_short Impact of Insurance and Practice Type on Access to Orthopaedic Sports Medicine
title_sort impact of insurance and practice type on access to orthopaedic sports medicine
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7401157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32782900
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120933696
work_keys_str_mv AT shiweilong impactofinsuranceandpracticetypeonaccesstoorthopaedicsportsmedicine
AT anastasioalbert impactofinsuranceandpracticetypeonaccesstoorthopaedicsportsmedicine
AT guissendeyef impactofinsuranceandpracticetypeonaccesstoorthopaedicsportsmedicine
AT farajrazan impactofinsuranceandpracticetypeonaccesstoorthopaedicsportsmedicine
AT fakunleomololap impactofinsuranceandpracticetypeonaccesstoorthopaedicsportsmedicine
AT easleykirk impactofinsuranceandpracticetypeonaccesstoorthopaedicsportsmedicine
AT hammondkylee impactofinsuranceandpracticetypeonaccesstoorthopaedicsportsmedicine