Cargando…
Arthroscopic Repair of Rotator Cuff Tears by Human Dermal Allograft Reconstruction vs Maximal Repair
OBJECTIVES: To determine healing rate of rotator cuff reconstruction with an acellular human dermal allograft compared with the gold standard arthroscopic maximal rotator cuff repair of large, chronic tears of the rotator cuff. METHODS: Thirty patients with a two-tendon chronic retracted rotator cuf...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7401164/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120S00331 |
_version_ | 1783566506739630080 |
---|---|
author | Xu, Jian Ravipati, Anjaneyulu Purnachandra Tejasw King, John-Paul Coady, Catherine Wong, Ivan |
author_facet | Xu, Jian Ravipati, Anjaneyulu Purnachandra Tejasw King, John-Paul Coady, Catherine Wong, Ivan |
author_sort | Xu, Jian |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To determine healing rate of rotator cuff reconstruction with an acellular human dermal allograft compared with the gold standard arthroscopic maximal rotator cuff repair of large, chronic tears of the rotator cuff. METHODS: Thirty patients with a two-tendon chronic retracted rotator cuff tear were enrolled in the study and were randomly allocated (15) to each group. All the patients were evaluated for structural integrity of repair using a 1.5T MRI at an average of 15 months after surgery. Rotator cuff arthropathy (RCA) and acromio-humeral distance (AHD) were graded using X-rays. Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH), Marx Activity Rating Scale (MARX) scores, range of motion (ROM) of shoulder were analyzed. RESULTS: The re-tear rate in the reconstruction group was 13% (2 of 15 patients) compared to 73% (11/15) in the repair group (p=0.008). Progression of RCA was seen in 7% (1/15) and 35.71% (5/15) of patients in the reconstruction and repair group, respectively (p=0.006). The change in AHD (preop-postop) was significantly higher in the repair (reduced by 2.27 mm) than the reconstruction group (increased by 0.1 mm) (P=0.006). Both groups had significant improvements in patient reported outcome scores. The reconstruction group had statistically significant better forward flexion (p= 0.01) and scapular plane abduction (p=0.03) compared to the repair group. CONCLUSIONS: Rotator cuff reconstruction with a dermal allograft demonstrated favorable structural healing rates and improved range of motion compared to maximal repair in the short term. Moreover, the maximal repair group were more likely to develop RCA than reconstruction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7401164 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74011642020-08-10 Arthroscopic Repair of Rotator Cuff Tears by Human Dermal Allograft Reconstruction vs Maximal Repair Xu, Jian Ravipati, Anjaneyulu Purnachandra Tejasw King, John-Paul Coady, Catherine Wong, Ivan Orthop J Sports Med Article OBJECTIVES: To determine healing rate of rotator cuff reconstruction with an acellular human dermal allograft compared with the gold standard arthroscopic maximal rotator cuff repair of large, chronic tears of the rotator cuff. METHODS: Thirty patients with a two-tendon chronic retracted rotator cuff tear were enrolled in the study and were randomly allocated (15) to each group. All the patients were evaluated for structural integrity of repair using a 1.5T MRI at an average of 15 months after surgery. Rotator cuff arthropathy (RCA) and acromio-humeral distance (AHD) were graded using X-rays. Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH), Marx Activity Rating Scale (MARX) scores, range of motion (ROM) of shoulder were analyzed. RESULTS: The re-tear rate in the reconstruction group was 13% (2 of 15 patients) compared to 73% (11/15) in the repair group (p=0.008). Progression of RCA was seen in 7% (1/15) and 35.71% (5/15) of patients in the reconstruction and repair group, respectively (p=0.006). The change in AHD (preop-postop) was significantly higher in the repair (reduced by 2.27 mm) than the reconstruction group (increased by 0.1 mm) (P=0.006). Both groups had significant improvements in patient reported outcome scores. The reconstruction group had statistically significant better forward flexion (p= 0.01) and scapular plane abduction (p=0.03) compared to the repair group. CONCLUSIONS: Rotator cuff reconstruction with a dermal allograft demonstrated favorable structural healing rates and improved range of motion compared to maximal repair in the short term. Moreover, the maximal repair group were more likely to develop RCA than reconstruction. SAGE Publications 2020-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7401164/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120S00331 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This open-access article is published and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - No Derivatives License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits the noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction of the article in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this article without the permission of the Author(s). For article reuse guidelines, please visit SAGE’s website at http://www.sagepub.com/journals-permissions. |
spellingShingle | Article Xu, Jian Ravipati, Anjaneyulu Purnachandra Tejasw King, John-Paul Coady, Catherine Wong, Ivan Arthroscopic Repair of Rotator Cuff Tears by Human Dermal Allograft Reconstruction vs Maximal Repair |
title | Arthroscopic Repair of Rotator Cuff Tears by Human Dermal Allograft Reconstruction vs Maximal Repair |
title_full | Arthroscopic Repair of Rotator Cuff Tears by Human Dermal Allograft Reconstruction vs Maximal Repair |
title_fullStr | Arthroscopic Repair of Rotator Cuff Tears by Human Dermal Allograft Reconstruction vs Maximal Repair |
title_full_unstemmed | Arthroscopic Repair of Rotator Cuff Tears by Human Dermal Allograft Reconstruction vs Maximal Repair |
title_short | Arthroscopic Repair of Rotator Cuff Tears by Human Dermal Allograft Reconstruction vs Maximal Repair |
title_sort | arthroscopic repair of rotator cuff tears by human dermal allograft reconstruction vs maximal repair |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7401164/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120S00331 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xujian arthroscopicrepairofrotatorcufftearsbyhumandermalallograftreconstructionvsmaximalrepair AT ravipatianjaneyulupurnachandratejasw arthroscopicrepairofrotatorcufftearsbyhumandermalallograftreconstructionvsmaximalrepair AT kingjohnpaul arthroscopicrepairofrotatorcufftearsbyhumandermalallograftreconstructionvsmaximalrepair AT coadycatherine arthroscopicrepairofrotatorcufftearsbyhumandermalallograftreconstructionvsmaximalrepair AT wongivan arthroscopicrepairofrotatorcufftearsbyhumandermalallograftreconstructionvsmaximalrepair |