Cargando…

Arthroscopic Repair of Rotator Cuff Tears by Human Dermal Allograft Reconstruction vs Maximal Repair

OBJECTIVES: To determine healing rate of rotator cuff reconstruction with an acellular human dermal allograft compared with the gold standard arthroscopic maximal rotator cuff repair of large, chronic tears of the rotator cuff. METHODS: Thirty patients with a two-tendon chronic retracted rotator cuf...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Jian, Ravipati, Anjaneyulu Purnachandra Tejasw, King, John-Paul, Coady, Catherine, Wong, Ivan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7401164/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120S00331
_version_ 1783566506739630080
author Xu, Jian
Ravipati, Anjaneyulu Purnachandra Tejasw
King, John-Paul
Coady, Catherine
Wong, Ivan
author_facet Xu, Jian
Ravipati, Anjaneyulu Purnachandra Tejasw
King, John-Paul
Coady, Catherine
Wong, Ivan
author_sort Xu, Jian
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To determine healing rate of rotator cuff reconstruction with an acellular human dermal allograft compared with the gold standard arthroscopic maximal rotator cuff repair of large, chronic tears of the rotator cuff. METHODS: Thirty patients with a two-tendon chronic retracted rotator cuff tear were enrolled in the study and were randomly allocated (15) to each group. All the patients were evaluated for structural integrity of repair using a 1.5T MRI at an average of 15 months after surgery. Rotator cuff arthropathy (RCA) and acromio-humeral distance (AHD) were graded using X-rays. Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH), Marx Activity Rating Scale (MARX) scores, range of motion (ROM) of shoulder were analyzed. RESULTS: The re-tear rate in the reconstruction group was 13% (2 of 15 patients) compared to 73% (11/15) in the repair group (p=0.008). Progression of RCA was seen in 7% (1/15) and 35.71% (5/15) of patients in the reconstruction and repair group, respectively (p=0.006). The change in AHD (preop-postop) was significantly higher in the repair (reduced by 2.27 mm) than the reconstruction group (increased by 0.1 mm) (P=0.006). Both groups had significant improvements in patient reported outcome scores. The reconstruction group had statistically significant better forward flexion (p= 0.01) and scapular plane abduction (p=0.03) compared to the repair group. CONCLUSIONS: Rotator cuff reconstruction with a dermal allograft demonstrated favorable structural healing rates and improved range of motion compared to maximal repair in the short term. Moreover, the maximal repair group were more likely to develop RCA than reconstruction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7401164
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74011642020-08-10 Arthroscopic Repair of Rotator Cuff Tears by Human Dermal Allograft Reconstruction vs Maximal Repair Xu, Jian Ravipati, Anjaneyulu Purnachandra Tejasw King, John-Paul Coady, Catherine Wong, Ivan Orthop J Sports Med Article OBJECTIVES: To determine healing rate of rotator cuff reconstruction with an acellular human dermal allograft compared with the gold standard arthroscopic maximal rotator cuff repair of large, chronic tears of the rotator cuff. METHODS: Thirty patients with a two-tendon chronic retracted rotator cuff tear were enrolled in the study and were randomly allocated (15) to each group. All the patients were evaluated for structural integrity of repair using a 1.5T MRI at an average of 15 months after surgery. Rotator cuff arthropathy (RCA) and acromio-humeral distance (AHD) were graded using X-rays. Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH), Marx Activity Rating Scale (MARX) scores, range of motion (ROM) of shoulder were analyzed. RESULTS: The re-tear rate in the reconstruction group was 13% (2 of 15 patients) compared to 73% (11/15) in the repair group (p=0.008). Progression of RCA was seen in 7% (1/15) and 35.71% (5/15) of patients in the reconstruction and repair group, respectively (p=0.006). The change in AHD (preop-postop) was significantly higher in the repair (reduced by 2.27 mm) than the reconstruction group (increased by 0.1 mm) (P=0.006). Both groups had significant improvements in patient reported outcome scores. The reconstruction group had statistically significant better forward flexion (p= 0.01) and scapular plane abduction (p=0.03) compared to the repair group. CONCLUSIONS: Rotator cuff reconstruction with a dermal allograft demonstrated favorable structural healing rates and improved range of motion compared to maximal repair in the short term. Moreover, the maximal repair group were more likely to develop RCA than reconstruction. SAGE Publications 2020-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7401164/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120S00331 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This open-access article is published and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - No Derivatives License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits the noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction of the article in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this article without the permission of the Author(s). For article reuse guidelines, please visit SAGE’s website at http://www.sagepub.com/journals-permissions.
spellingShingle Article
Xu, Jian
Ravipati, Anjaneyulu Purnachandra Tejasw
King, John-Paul
Coady, Catherine
Wong, Ivan
Arthroscopic Repair of Rotator Cuff Tears by Human Dermal Allograft Reconstruction vs Maximal Repair
title Arthroscopic Repair of Rotator Cuff Tears by Human Dermal Allograft Reconstruction vs Maximal Repair
title_full Arthroscopic Repair of Rotator Cuff Tears by Human Dermal Allograft Reconstruction vs Maximal Repair
title_fullStr Arthroscopic Repair of Rotator Cuff Tears by Human Dermal Allograft Reconstruction vs Maximal Repair
title_full_unstemmed Arthroscopic Repair of Rotator Cuff Tears by Human Dermal Allograft Reconstruction vs Maximal Repair
title_short Arthroscopic Repair of Rotator Cuff Tears by Human Dermal Allograft Reconstruction vs Maximal Repair
title_sort arthroscopic repair of rotator cuff tears by human dermal allograft reconstruction vs maximal repair
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7401164/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120S00331
work_keys_str_mv AT xujian arthroscopicrepairofrotatorcufftearsbyhumandermalallograftreconstructionvsmaximalrepair
AT ravipatianjaneyulupurnachandratejasw arthroscopicrepairofrotatorcufftearsbyhumandermalallograftreconstructionvsmaximalrepair
AT kingjohnpaul arthroscopicrepairofrotatorcufftearsbyhumandermalallograftreconstructionvsmaximalrepair
AT coadycatherine arthroscopicrepairofrotatorcufftearsbyhumandermalallograftreconstructionvsmaximalrepair
AT wongivan arthroscopicrepairofrotatorcufftearsbyhumandermalallograftreconstructionvsmaximalrepair