Cargando…
61. EXPRESSION OF ANDROGEN RECEPTOR IN BREAST CANCER BRAIN METASTASIS
INTRODUCTION: Treatment options for women with breast cancer brain metastases (BrM) are generally limited to surgery and/or radiotherapy because most systemic therapies do not cross the blood-brain barrier. Androgen receptors (ARs) are frequently expressed in breast cancer and anti-androgenic therap...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7401346/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdaa073.049 |
Sumario: | INTRODUCTION: Treatment options for women with breast cancer brain metastases (BrM) are generally limited to surgery and/or radiotherapy because most systemic therapies do not cross the blood-brain barrier. Androgen receptors (ARs) are frequently expressed in breast cancer and anti-androgenic therapies have been shown to penetrate the central nervous system. In this study, we analyzed the expression of AR in breast cancer BrM to identify patients who may benefit from anti-androgenic therapies. METHODS: Consecutive BrM resected in our institution (July 1999-June 2013) were identified from the Anatomic Pathology departmental database. Cases that were signed out as breast origin given the available immunohistochemical profile and clinical history were included. A tissue microarray was constructed using 1 mm cores in triplicates and studied by immunohistochemistry for AR, ER, PR and HER2 (SP107, SP1, IE2, 4B5; Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson AZ, USA). HER2 gene amplification was determined by INFORM HER2 DNA and Chromosome 17 (both by Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson AZ, USA). Immunohistochemistry was used as a surrogate to determine intrinsic subtypes. RESULTS: Among 61 breast cancer BrM with available tissue blocks, AR was expressed in 38 (62%) cases. Among BrMs of luminal A subtype (ER+, PR+/-, HER2-, Ki67<16%), 50% expressed AR (n=1/2). Within the luminal B subtype (ER+, PR+/-), all 15 HER2+ BrM expressed AR (100%), while only 50% of HER2- BrM expressed AR (n=8/16). Among 14 BrM of HER2+ subtype (ER-, PR-), 71% expressed AR (n=10/14). Only 30% of triple negative BrM (ER-, PR-, HER2-) were AR+ (n=4/14). CONCLUSION: Almost two-thirds of breast cancer BrM expressed AR. HER2+ luminal B and HER2+ subtypes were most likely to be AR+, while only 30% of triple negative BrM were AR+. Our data suggests that certain subtypes of breast cancer BrM are more likely to be AR+ and could serve as a potential therapeutic target. |
---|